:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Qualification of Expert Witnesses in United States Patent Litigation: A Review of Federal Circuit Case Law Regarding Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence
書刊名:科技法學評論
作者:陳秉訓 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Ping-hsun
出版日期:2014
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁155-220
主題關鍵詞:非顯而易知性專利訴訟專家證人聯邦證據規則損害賠償計算NonobviousnessPatent litigationExpert witnessRules of evidenceDamages calculation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:50
期刊論文
1.Chatlynne, Etan S.(2013)。On Measuring the Expertise of Patent-Pilot Judges: Encouraging Enhancement of Claim-Construction Uniformity。J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L.,12,309。  new window
2.Eisenberg, Rebecca S.(2004)。Obvious to Whom? Evaluating Inventions from the Perspective of PHOSITA。Berkeley Tech. L. J.,19(3),885-897。  new window
3.Epstein, Roy J.、Malherbe, Paul(2011)。Reasonable Royalty Patent Infringement Damages After Uniloc。AIPLAQ.J.,39,3。  new window
4.Griebel, Kathleen Keough(1155)。Student Work, Fred Zain, the CSI Effect, and a Philosophical Idea of Justice: Using West Virginia as a Model for Change。W. Va. L. Rev.,114,1155。  new window
5.Hudis, Jonathan(2000)。Experts in Intellectual Property Cases: A New Paradigm。J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'Y,82,651。  new window
6.Huff, Marilyn L.(2012)。Developments in the Jurisprudence on the Use of Experts。WASH. J.L.Tech. & Arts,7,325。  new window
7.Hungar, Thomas G.、Mohan, Rajiv(2013)。A Case Study Regarding the Ongoing Dialogue Between the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court: The Federal Circuit s Implementation of KSR v. Teleflex。SMU L. Rev.,66,559。  new window
8.Jarosz, John C.、Chapman, Michael J.(2013)。The Hypothetical Negotiation and Reasonable Royalty Damages: The Tail Wagging the Dog。Stan. Tech. L. Rev.,16。  new window
9.Krause, Thomas W.、Auyang, Heather F.(2013)。What Close Cases and Reversals Reveal About Claim Construction at the Federal Circuit。Intell. Prop. L.,12,583。  new window
10.Mayo, Erika(2013)。Gatekeeping Post-Uniloc: Expert Testimony in Multi- Component Patent Litigation。HASTINGS Bus. L.J.,9,539。  new window
11.Moore, Kimberly A.(2012)。Judges, Juries, and Patent Cases--An Empirical Peek Inside the Black Box。Circuit B.J,209,209。  new window
12.Narechania, Tejas N.、Taylor Kirklin, Jackson(2012)。An Unsettling Development: The Use of Settlement-Related Evidence for Damages Determinations in Patent Litigation。U. III. J.L. Tech. & Pol’Y,1。  new window
13.Nicolas, Peter(2004)。De Novo Review in Deferential Robes?: A Deconstruction of the Standard of Review of Evidentiary Errors in the Federal System。SYRACUSE L. Rev.,54,531。  new window
14.Raucci, Anthony D.(2012)。Notes, A Case Against the Entire Market Value Rule。WASH. & Lee L. Rev.,69,2233。  new window
15.Reese, Alex(2013)。Employee and Inventor Witnesses in Patent Trials: The Blurry Line Between Expert and Lay Testimony。STAN. Tech. L. Rev.,16,423-426。  new window
16.Rogers, James F.、Shelson, James、Zeigler, Jessalyn H.(2013)。Changes in the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence。Def. COUNS. J.,80,287。  new window
17.Rollor, Claire R.(2013)。Note and Comment, Logic,Not Evidence, Supports a Change in Expert Testimony Standards: Why Evidentiary Standards Promulgated by the Supreme Court for Scientific Expert Testimony Are Inappropriate and Inefficient When Applied in Patent Infringement Su。J. Bus. & TECH. L.,8,313。  new window
18.Sganga, John B.,Jr.(1999)。Litigating Obviousness: A New Approach for Using Expert Witnesses。J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'Y,81,181。  new window
19.Simon, Brenda M.(2013)。The Implications of Technological Advancement for Obviousness。Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev.,19,331。  new window
20.Sung, Lawrence M.(1999)。Echoes of Scientific Truth in the Halls of Justice: The Standards of Review Applied by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Patent-Related Matters。Am. U. L. Rev.,48,1233-1237。  new window
21.Torous, Edward(2012)。Unknotting Uniloc。Berkeley Tech. L.J.,27,381。  new window
22.Ware, James(2007)。Patent Rules of Evidence。Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J.,23,749。  new window
圖書
1.Giannelli, Paul C.(2006)。Understanding Evidence。Newark, NJ:Lexis Nexis。  new window
2.Mueller, Christopher B.、Kirkpatrick, Laird C.(2009)。Evidence。Aspen Publishers。  new window
3.Shreve, Gene R.、Raven-Hansen, Peter(2002)。Understanding Civil Procedure。Lexis Nexis。  new window
4.Schechter, Roger E.、Thomas, John R.(2004)。Principles of Patent Law。St. Paul, MN:West, a Thomson Business。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE