臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：霍布斯論自然法與政治義務
書刊名：政治與社會哲學評論
作者：周家瑜 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chou, Chia-yu
出版日期：2014
卷期：50
頁次：頁59-100
主題關鍵詞：霍布斯；政治義務；事實政治權力；同意；自然法；Thomas Hobbes；Political obligation；De facto political power；Consent；The laws of nature
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:18
本文處理的是霍布斯式自然法在其政治理論中的角色與作用，霍布斯自然法向來是其政治理論中較被忽略之處，因通常認為霍布斯為證成其絕對主權而弱化傳統自然法權威，但弔詭的是霍布斯式自然法卻又似乎具相當的規範效力，而因為兩種進路均有相當文本證據支持所以形成某種「詮釋的兩難」。為探討自然法在霍布斯政治理論中的角色與功能，本文將從霍布斯政治義務觀切入，探討自然法與其政治義務之關聯。本文主要論證兩點：首先，本文對當代主流事實權威論對於霍布斯之政治義務的詮釋提出質疑，此一主流論點認為霍布斯式自然法並無重要性，本文將論證若認真考量霍布斯的自然法論述，將對其政治義務觀有更完整的理解；具體而言，藉由探討自然法的角色，本文論證霍布斯的政治義務並非僅僅建立在「事實的強力」或「同意」之上，而必須考慮到自然法所給出的限制，因此可以說政治義務建立在「理性的同意」上。
In this essay I examine the role and function of Hobbes's account of the laws of nature in his political theory by reconsidering the basis of his concept of political obligation. This essay takes issue with common readings of Hobbes which either considers Hobbesian laws of nature is nothing but counsels from reason(which provides no obligations) or mere hypothetical imperatives(which at best justify prudential obligations). To argue against the common readings, this essay argues that Hobbesian laws of nature is essential to understanding Hobbes's concept of political obligation because they provide some kind of natural duty by which an effective ＂reasonable consent＂ can be defined. In addition, to argue against the view of de facto theory, I argue that both ＂Consent＂ and ＂Safety＂ are the necessary conditions of Hobbesian conception of political obligation.
期刊論文
1.Baumgold, Deborah(2013)。Trusf in Hobbes's Political Thought。Political Theory，41(6)，838-855。  new window
2.Burgess, Glenn(1990)。Contexts for the Writing and Publication of Hobbes's Leviathan。History of Political Thought，2(4)，675-702。  new window
3.Deigh, John(2003)。Reply to Mark Murphy。Journal of the History of Philosophy，4(1)，97-109。  new window
4.Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus(1955)。Are There Ant Natural Rights。Philosophical Review，64(2)，175-191。  new window
5.Harvey, Martin(1999)。Hobbes's Conception of Natural Law。The Southern Journal of Philosophy，37(3)，441-460。  new window
6.Hoekstra, Kinch(2003)。Hobbes on Law, Nature and Reason。Journal of History of Philosophy，41(1)，111-120。  new window
7.LeBuffe, Michael(2010)。Hobbes, on the Origin of Obligation。British Journal for the History of Philosophy，11(1)，15-39。  new window
8.Lloyd, Sharon A.(2001)。Hobbes's Self-Effacing Natural Law Theory。Pacific Philosophical Quarterly，82(3/4)，285-308。  new window
9.Peacock, Mark(2010)。Obligation and Advantage in Hobbes' Leviathan。Canadian Journal of Philosophy，40(3)，433-458。  new window
10.Murphy, Mark C.(1995)。Was Hobbes a Legal Positivist。Ethics，105(4)，846-873。  new window
11.Schedler, George(1977)。Hobbes on the Basis of Political Obligation。Journal of the History of Philosophy，15(2)，165-170。  new window
12.Skinner, Quentin(1964)。Hobbes's Leviathan。The Historical Journal，7(2)，321-333。  new window
13.Taylor, Alfred Edward(1938)。The Ethical Doctrine of Thomas Hobbes。Philosophy，13(52)，406-424。  new window
圖書
1.Schmitt, Carl、Schwab, George、Hilfstein, Erna(1996)。The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol。Greenwood Press。  new window
2.Boonin-Vail, David(1994)。Thomas Hobbes and the Science of Moral Virtue。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Hobbes, Thomas、Tonnies, Ferdinand(1990)。Behemoth or The Long Parliament。Chicago。  new window
4.Hood, Francis Campbell(1964)。The Divine Politics of Thomas Hobbes: An Interpretation of "Leviathan"。Oxford：Clarendon Press。  new window
5.Kavka, Gregory(1986)。Hobbesian Moral and Political Philosophy。Princeton, N. J.：Princeton University Press。  new window
6.Parkin, Jon(2007)。Taming the Leviathan。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Lloyd, Sharon A.(2009)。Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: Cases in the Law of Nature。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Sreedhar, Susanne(2010)。Hobbes on Resistance。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Zagorin, Perez(2009)。Hobbes and the Law of Nature。Princeton University Press。  new window
10.Tuck, Richard(1993)。Philosophy and Government。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Watkins, J. W. N.(1965)。Hobbes's System of Ideas。London：Hutchinson。  new window
12.陳思賢(2008)。西洋政治思想史：近代英國篇。台北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
13.Bobbio, Norberto、Gobetti, Daniela(1993)。Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition。Chicago。  new window
14.Gauthier, David P.(1969)。The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes。Oxford University Press。  new window
15.Hobbes, Thomas、Curley, Edwin(1994)。Leviathan。Hackett Publishing Company。  new window
16.Rawls, John(2007)。Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy。Belknap Press。  new window
17.Warrender, Howard(1957)。The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation。Oxford：Clarendon Press。  new window
18.Hampton, Jean(1986)。Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition。Cambridge University Press。  new window
19.Rawls, J.(1971)。A Theory of Justice。Stanford：Stanford Univ. Press。  new window
20.Martinich, Aloysius Patrick(1992)。The Two Gods of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Religion and Politics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
21.Hobbes, Thomas、Tuck, Richard、Silverthorne, Michael(1998)。On the Citizen。Cambridge University Press。  new window
22.Strauss, Leo(1953)。Natural Right and History。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
23.Rawls, John(1993)。Political Liberalism。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hoekstra, Kinch(2004)。The De Facto Turn in Hobbes's Political Philosophy。Leviathan After 350 Years。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Skinner, Quentin(2002)。The Context of Hobbes's Theory of Political Obligation。Visions of Politics。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Skinner, Quentin(1972)。Conquest and Consent: Thomas Hobbes and the Engagement Controversy。The Interregnum: The Quest for Settlement 1646-1660。London：Macmillan。  new window
4.Goldsmith, M.M.(1996)。Hobbes on Law。The Cambridge Campanion to Hobbes。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1192（臺灣：1177，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2241491 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68046524
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上