:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高爾夫桿頭合金材料機械性質之探討
書刊名:華人運動生物力學期刊
作者:郭癸賓 引用關係趙志燁何維華 引用關係
作者(外文):Kuo, Kuei-pinChao, Chih-yehHo, Wei-hua
出版日期:2014
卷期:11
頁次:頁34-40
主題關鍵詞:金屬材料彈簧效益特徵時間反彈係數Metal materialsSpring-Like effectCharacteristic timeCoefficient of restitution
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:8
高爾夫球桿自1980年代起有了突破性的革命,無論是桿身或桿頭皆從木質材料演進至碳纖維或金屬材料,以致擊球距離越來越遠,最低桿紀錄屢創新低,比賽熱烈的程度越來越高。本研究以近30年球桿頭使用材料的發展,從柿木、鐵系合金、不銹鋼、鈦或少數其它金屬的過程進行分析。從研究的結果發現,桿頭演進的趨勢循著追求遠距與操控性,因此在材質的要求是以機械性質強又具高延伸率為主,機械性質強是期能創造更高的彈簧效益達到距離遠的目標,高延伸率是希望擊球擁有最佳的操控打感。同時也發現金屬材料也以輕量化為趨勢,鈦合金具有質輕密度佳高強度的特性,適用於製造大型化桿頭,所以目前開球木桿90%以上都使用鈦合金為主流材料,但因不斷的創新與進步,近年在規則上就設置開球木桿彈簧效益(coefficient of restitution, COR、characteristic time, CT)的限制,避免距離不斷增加,以致球場設計改善因應不及。
Golf clubs have undergone revolutionary breakthroughs since the 1980s. With the materials used for club shafts or heads evolved from woods to carbon fibers or metals, driving distance became longer. The record for lowest strokes has been broken repeatedly and the competition level has become more intense. This study analyzed the development of club head materials from persimmon wood, iron alloy, stainless steel to titanium or other metals. The results indicate that the trend of golf club heads development is guided by longer flight distances and excellent control. Therefore, the requirements for material characteristics are superior mechanical properties and higher elongation rates. Superior mechanical property enhances the spring-like effect that can improve flight distance., Higher elongation rate provides optimal control. It was also found that metal materials tends to be lighter in weight. Titanium alloy is a light metal with low density and high strength. It is suitable for larger size of club heads. Currently, more than 90% of drivers adopt titanium alloy as the primary material. However, due to continuing innovations and advancements, golf rules has been trying to limit spring-like effects for drivers (COR and CT)in recent years to prevent constantly increasing driving distance that new golf course design may not be able to improve with the same pace.
期刊論文
1.毛樹仁、吳揚名(20110700)。探討臺灣高爾夫球頭產業之競爭優勢。亞太研究通訊. 南華大學亞太研究所,9,87-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.郭癸賓、趙志燁、何維華(20140600)。高爾夫球桿頭設計之發展趨勢。中華體育季刊,28(2)=109,163-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.莊民峯(2013)。鍛造鐵桿的魅力。高爾夫雜誌,115。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉宏裕(20040800)。大不列顛高爾夫球探源。大專高爾夫學刊,2,1-8。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭紹建(2007)。鐵-14鉻-7鎳-8鎢-4鉬合金特性分析(碩士論文)。屏東科技大學,屏東縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝昇宏(2005)。高爾夫球桿頭打擊面曲率變化之擊球效果分析(碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
3.夏生明(2002)。304不銹鋼與軟鋼之鍛造接合研究(碩士論文)。義守大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭家宏(2007)。鈦-4.5鋁-2.6鉬-1釩合金機械性質與相變化分析(碩士論文)。國立屏東科技大學,屏東縣。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡尚達(2006)。鈦-15釩-3鉻-3錫-3鋁相變化與性質分析(碩士論文)。屏東科技大學,屏東縣。  延伸查詢new window
6.謝文隆(2008)。複合材料高爾夫球桿頭之設計與擊球效果分析(碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.USGA、R & A、中華民國高爾夫協會(2012)。高爾夫規則及業餘身分規則2012-2015。臺北市:中華民國高爾夫協會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Ping(2013)。Choose your iron or compare models,Ping Golf Company。,http://www.ping.com/clubs/irons.aspx。  new window
2.USGA,R&A(2003)。Technical description of the pendulum test,http://www.jga.or.jp/jga/html/rules/image/info3_pendulum_tec200311_en.pdf。  new window
3.(2007)。鐵桿設計:刀背式與中空式的設計差異,高球達人,http://www.golfware.com/index.php/2007/12/04/12-01-2/。  延伸查詢new window
4.羅裕霖(2012)。從一百五十萬成長到二百三十萬人,http://tw.sports.yahoo.com/golf/blog/lookgolf_lo/437.html。  延伸查詢new window
5.Driver Head Technology,http://www.golfclub -technology.com/coefficient-of-restitution.html。  new window
6.Lo, K. N.,Chung, W. H.,Liao, H.(1997)。COMPOSITE-METAL GOLF CLUB HEAD(5,624,331)。,San Diego, Calif:Pro-Kennex, Inc.。  new window
7.Nike(2013)。NIKE VR_S COVERT 鐵桿,http://www.nike.com/tw/zh_tw/c/golf/stories/2013/clubs/irons/vrs-covert。  new window
8.One Golf(2012)。進階利器,尼克斯高爾夫行銷有限公司。,http://onegolf.appscomb.net/op/channel_2?id=400。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Universal Golf(2012)。日本高爾夫歷史回顧。全球高球用品綜合指南2012。香港:凱亞出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE