:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:官員問責:重“責” 還是重“問”?
書刊名:行政:澳門公共行政雜誌
作者:鄞益奮
作者(外文):Yin, Yifen
出版日期:2014
卷期:27:1=103
頁次:頁19-28+125-139+231
主題關鍵詞:官員問責制澳門行政制度
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:3
In Macao SAR, the officials accountability system can not really work though there are some relative law provisions for officials accountability. Frist, The public accountability, the mass-media accountability and the legislative council accountability can’t play a substantial role in the system. Secondly, the correspondence between power and responsibility is blurred, the system can’t distinguish individual accountability from collective accountability. Thirdly, The system has no specific regulations to the accountability content such as budget accountability and performance accountability. Finally, in the practice of the system, there is no such corresponding mechanism as the transparency of the government, which makes the public and society unsatisfied. Only when the above problems are solved, can the officials accountability system be enforced effectively.
期刊論文
1.Ma, J.(2009)。The Dilemma of Developing Financial Accountability without Election Australia。Journal of Public Administration,68,62-72。  new window
2.鄞益奮(2008)。官員問責制的基本構成。澳門月刊,5,18-19。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊君(2010)。從問責官員復出困局審視官員問責的制度重構。領導科學,4,4-7。  延伸查詢new window
4.梁棟、鄭曙村(2010)。當前我國官員問責復出機制的失範與完善。當代世界與社會主義,1,125-128。  延伸查詢new window
5.沈小平(2009)。頻繁復出凸顯制度設計缺陷。領導科學,6,9-11。  延伸查詢new window
6.婁勝華(2011)。授權與問責:澳門特區官員問責制審視。國家行政學院學報,2011(4),66-70。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE