:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國際政治的特殊國家關係
書刊名:臺灣國際法季刊
作者:吳志中 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Chih-chung
出版日期:2013
卷期:10:3
頁次:頁85-111
主題關鍵詞:特殊關係國際法國際政治外交關係Special relationshipInternational lawInternational politicsForeign relationship
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:8
在人類所形成的國際社會裡,國家一直是最基本的成員與角色扮演者,而主權國家的數目也不斷發展與增加,特別是在二十世紀成長最快。如果不以加入聯合國與否,而單以1933年簽訂《蒙特維多國家權利義務公約》所規定的國家要件,即具備人民、領土、主權政府與他國交往之能力即算是國家來看,則國家的數目將超越200以上。然而,國家間的關係並非都是一成不變的,檢視世界各國與鄰國的關係,吾人可以發現因為歷史、政治、文化、地緣政治因素,從而擁有特殊關係(Special Relationship)的國家並不在少數。本文將介紹美國與英國、俄羅斯與白俄羅斯、澳洲與紐西蘭、芬蘭與蘇聯、法國與德國等十國的特殊關係實例,從國際政治的觀點來觀察國家間的關係,以建立可供參考之經驗。
Within the international society that formed by human activities, States by far are the basic members and play the most fundamental role. The number of States has also kept increasing especially in the 20th century. Regardless of United Nations' membership, if we only judge by the elements of State provided by 1933 Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, that is, population, territory, sovereign government and ability to establish foreign relation, there are more than 200 States in nowadays international society. However, relations among States will not stop changing. If we review the relations between State all over the world and their neighbor States, one can find out the number of States that have special relationship with other States by historical, political, cultural, geopolitical reasons are absolutely not few cases. This article will introduce several examples that states possessing special relationship with other like USA and UK, Russia and Belarus, Australia and New Zealand, Finland and Soviet Union, France and Germany, etc. from the perspective of international politics for readers' reference.
期刊論文
1.Drake, H.(2006)。France: an EU founder member cut down to Size?。Journal of European Integration,28(1),89-105。  new window
2.Bruner, M. L.(2005)。Rhetorical theory and the critique of national identity construction。National Identities,7(3),309-327。  new window
3.Arter, D.(1995)。The EU referendum in Finland on 16 October 1994: A vote for the West, notfor Maastricht。Journal of Common Market Studies,33(3),361-387。  new window
4.Hagen, J.(2003)。Redrawing the imagined map of Europe: The rise and fall of the center。Political Geography,22(3),489-517。  new window
5.Duke, S.(20008)。The Future of EU-NATO Relations: a Case of Mutual Irrelevance Through Competition?。Journal of European Integration,30(1),27-43。  new window
圖書
1.Grabar, V. E.、Butler, W. E.(1990)。The History of International Law in Russia, 1647-1917: A Bio-Bibliographical Study。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
2.Cohen, S.(1994)。La defaite des generaux。Paris:Fayard。  new window
3.Kissinger, Henry A.(1979)。The White House Year。Little, Brown and Company。  new window
4.Ingebritsen, C.(1998)。The Nordic states and European unity。Ithaca:Cornell University Press。  new window
5.Booth, Ken、Dunne, Tim(1999)。Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order。NY:Palgrave MacMillan。  new window
6.Butler, William E.(2002)。The Law of Treaties in Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States, Text and Commentary。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Ringmar, Erik(1996)。Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden's Intervention in the Third Years War。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Crawford, James(2006)。The Creation of States in International Law。Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Brubaker, Rogers(1996)。Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.Patman, Robert G.(20040723)。How NZ Mixed Idealism with Realism。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ahtisaari, M.(1994)。Suomi. President Ahtisaari's Speech 7.9.1994。Ulkopoliittisia lausunto jajaasiakirjoja。Helsinki:Ministry for Foreign Affairs。  new window
2.Higgins, Rosalyn(2008)。Self-Determination and Secession。Themes and Theories。Oxford。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE