本研究目的為從運動倫理學角度，分析倫敦奧運羽球女子雙打的假球事件，以提供運動參與行為規範的理論基礎。筆者從Bernard Suits所提出的比賽要素和四種比賽行為類型，檢驗非投注性運動假球事件，本研究結論為倫敦奧運羽球女雙的消極比賽，不是一場真正的羽球比賽。首先，涉及這次消極比賽的選手，並沒有盡全力率先取得三局兩勝的比賽結果（前比賽目標），這些選手沒有嚴肅地對待羽球賽的目標；其次，採取比賽規則所不允許的棄賽行為（比賽方法）；最後，消極比賽的行為，雖然並沒有違反羽球比賽規則，但這些選手之所以接受比賽規則的限制，是為了執行教練命令或儲備戰力等外在於比賽的目的，完全喪失了該有的運動家精神（比賽態度）。因此，倫敦奧運羽球女雙的消極比賽行為，是一種不尊重比賽目標的表現，不是真正遊戲者所應展現出的行為，屬於Suits理論所指出的玩弄者行為。

The purpose of this study was from the perspective of sports ethics to analysis of the London Olympic women's doubles badminton match-fixing case, in order to provide a theoretical basis for sports participation behavior norms. From the game elements and the four type of game behavior in cording Bernard Suits, researcher examined thisnon-betting sports match-fixing, and found (1) London Olympic badminton doubles ＂match-throwing＂ case could not be qualified a real badminton game. (2)first of all, four pair female badminton players who involved in ＂trying to lose＂ event at the London Olympics were not using their best to attempting to being the best 2 out of 3 games( prelusory goal of game); secondly, all match-throwing behaviors is not allowed by the game rules(lusory mean); Finally, despite the match-throwing behaviors not being violated bythe rules of the games, but since the reason for they accepted therules wasextra-goals which is outside the game, Toexecutethe coach'command or to preserve energy for next game, therefore they already lost the spirit of sportsmanship (lusory attitude). This paper concluded that match-throwing at London Olympic badminton female doubles is the kind of triflers' behavior, and a real player would against it.