:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:伯林論自由與責任
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:龔群
作者(外文):Gong, Qun
出版日期:2015
卷期:42:7=494
頁次:頁177-197
主題關鍵詞:決定論自由責任TeleologyFreedomResponsibility
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:15
決定論有著悠久的思想傳統,與目的論與因果論相關;然而,決定論與自由具有一定的不相容性,如果說決定論與自由相容,也是在人類理性存在者的自我實現追求意義上的,而不是在選擇自由的意義土。可是,後者恰恰是自由的核心含義。其次,決定論與人的責任是不相容的。承認決定論也就意味著不承認人可承擔責任。但我們的分析表明,決定論與責任是相容的。
Determinism associated with teleological and causation theory has a long intellectual tradition. However, Berlin believes that determinism and freedom has a certain incompatibility; and if determinism is compatible with freedom, in this cause which is that human being as an reason being pursues his self-realization, rather than on the meaning of freedom of choice. However, the latter is precisely the core meaning of freedom. Secondly, determinism and human responsibilities are incompatible. Admitted determinism means that people can not admit responsibility. However, our analysis indicates that determinism and responsibility are compatible when people have freedom voluntarily to choose and decide what they do.
期刊論文
1.Farah, M.(2005)。Neuroethics: the Practical and the Philosophical。Trends in Cognitive Science,91。  new window
2.Kocis, Robert A.(198003)。Reason, Development, and the Conflicts of Human Ends, Sir Isaiah Berlin's Vision of Politics。The American Political Science Review,74(1),38-52。  new window
3.Greene, Joshua、Cohen, Jonathan(2004)。For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything。Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,359(1451),1775-1785。  new window
4.McClain, Linda C.(1994)。Law Rights and Irresponsibility。Duke Law Journal,43(5),989-1088。  new window
5.Parekh, Bhikhu(1982)。The Political Thought of Sir Isaiah Berlin。British Journal of Political Science,12(2),201-226。  new window
6.Putterman, Theodore L.(200607)。Berlin's Two Concepts of Liberty: A Reassessment and Revision。Polity,38(3),416-446。  new window
7.Rowe, William L.(199101)。Responsibility, Agent-Causation, and Freedom: An Eighteenth-Century View。Ethics,101(2),243。  new window
8.Watson, Gary(19750424)。Free Agency。The Journal of Philosophy,72(8),220。  new window
9.Donnelley, S.(2000)。Nature, freedom and responsibility: Ernst Mayr and Isaiah Berlin。Social Research,67(4),1110-1135。  new window
10.Frankfurt, Harry G.(1971)。Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person。The Journal of Philosophy,68(1),5-20。  new window
圖書
1.Berlin, Isaiah、Hardy, Henry(1969)。Liberty。New York:Oxford University Press, Inc.。  new window
2.以賽亞.伯林胡、傳勝(2002)。自由論。南京:譯林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.以賽亞.伯林、潘榮華(2011)。現實感觀念及其歷史研究。南京:譯林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.格雷、馬俊峰(1999)。伯林。北京:昆侖出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Jahanbegloo, Ramin、楊禎欽(2002)。伯林談話錄。譯林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.馬克.里拉、羅納德.德沃金、羅伯特.西雅斯、劉擎、殷瑩(2009)。以賽亞.伯林的遺產。北京:新星出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Aristotle、Rackham, H.(1926)。Nicomachean Ethics。Harvard University Press。  new window
8.Locke, John、Nidditch, Peter H.(1975)。An Essay Concerning Human Understanding。Oxford University Press。  new window
9.以賽亞.伯林、馮克利(2011)。反潮流:觀念史論文集。譯林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.H. G.法蘭克福、應奇(2006)。意志的自由與人的概念。自由意志與道德責任。江蘇:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.莫裏茨.石裏克、譚安奎(2006)。人何時應該負責任。自由意志與道德責任。江蘇:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.洛伊.韋瑟福德、段素革(2006)。決定論及其道德含義。自由意志與道德責任。江蘇:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top