Background: Aiming to maintain the sustainable development of the environment and to improve the standards of the national living environment, the Executive Yuan proposed in 2010 the "Intelligent Green Building Promotion Plan" to research and develop intelligent innovative technologies, products, and system services based on the foundation and advantages of building development to construct a quality living environment integrating "production", "life" and "eco-friendliness" and thereby develop and improve the competitiveness of emerging industries. Purposes: Through a literature review and analysis, this study analyzed the indicators for evaluating the impact of intelligent green residential buildings and developed the evaluation indicator system and criteria for intelligent green residential buildings. This study conducted an empirical study on the Optical Covent Garden community in Changhua City as the subject to examine the feasibility and reasonability of these indicators for the reference of designers. Methods: This study built the evaluation factor set and collected group opinion with system engineering and fuzzy Delphi methods and screened evaluation factors with fuzzy Delphi, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and the similarity aggregation method. Results: Among the 29 evaluation indicators obtained, the top ten indicators in order include: (1) fire alarm system (2) building structure safety (3) anti-theft and damage system (4) anti-seismic and wind-force resisting system (5) indoor ambient wind speed or airflow (6) indoor ambient temperature (7) escape and evacuation circulation (8) resident alarm system (9) CCTV system and (10) building evacuation facility. Conclusions/Implications for Practice: Although it is more objective and logical to solve the fuzzy evaluation problems among experts with the fuzzy theory, as the screening and weight of indicators were determined based on expert reviews, it is still necessary to select the appropriate expert group based on the research aim to enhance the reliability and validity of this study. This study thus recommends gathering and concluding expert opinions about evaluation indicators through expert meetings to make the coverage of the overall evaluation framework more accurate.