一般認為丕平(Robert B. Pippin) 把黑格爾置於先驗哲學的傳純中，視黑格爾的哲學為一種擴展的先驗哲學。然而這似乎且不是丕平所提出的唯一一種黑格爾解釋。根據他的另一種解讀，黑格爾的哲學並不是一種由一系列的先驗論證所構成，而是一系列的敘事說明(narrative account)。本文的目的在於探究丕平之解讀本身的理論問題。首先我將說明丕平對黑格爾的先驗論證解讀，繼之根據丕平的著作，證明他對於黑格爾有另一種詮釋；最後，我將要討論使得丕平由前者轉向後者的理論因素，並且追問他的敘事說明解釋所留下的問題。

Generally, it is thought that Robert Pippin locates Hegel in the tradition of transcendental philosophy and conceives his philosophy as a kind of extended transcendental philosophy. However, this seems not to be the only way in which Pippin interprets Hegel. According to his another reading, Hegel’s philosophy does not consist of a series of transcendental arguments, but a series of narrative accounts. In this paper, I will at first explain Pippin’s transcendental reading of Hegel and, in the second step, demonstrate that Pippin indeed proposes another interpretation of Hegel. I will then explore the theoretical reasons that drive Pippin from his transcendental reading of Hegel to the latter, narrative account reading. I will also discuss questions remaining to be answered for the narrative account interpretation.