:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:澳門刑事特別程序改革之路徑分析--以大陸法系發展趨勢為基礎
書刊名:澳門研究
作者:李哲
作者(外文):Li, Zhe
出版日期:2013
卷期:2013:1=68
頁次:頁44-58+196
主題關鍵詞:程序分流特別訴訟程序認罪協商Procedural diversionSpecial procedurePlea negotiation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
澳門刑事特別程序的設置未能有效發揮程序分流的功能,本次澳門刑事訴訟法典修改草案大幅借鑒葡萄牙刑事訴訟法典的有關規定,以期解決目前刑事案件的積壓問題。但是,1998年葡萄牙刑事訴訟法典所確立的包括“簡捷訴訟程序”在內的特別訴訟程序已不能代表大陸法系國家的普遍做法和發展趨勢。因此,有必要審慎思考本次澳門刑事訴訟法修改的路徑,考慮引入目前大陸法系國家普遍適用的認罪協商程序。
The diversion function of criminal special procedure has not been fully displayed in Macau. The current undergoing reform suggestion tries to transplant the regulations in the Criminal Procedure Code of Portugal to solve the problem of the heavy caseload in Macau. However, the abbreviated procedure as well as the system of special criminal procedure set up by the Portugal CPC in 1998 cannot represent the trend and common practices of civil law countries any more. Thus, it is necessary to consider possible ways for Macau to revise the criminal procedure, especially to consider the special procedure when a confession is already made by the defendant with or without negotiation.
期刊論文
1.Freccero, Stephen P.(1994)。An Introduction to the New Italian Criminal Procedure。American Journal of Criminal Law,21,345-359。  new window
2.Thomas Weigend(2003)。Is the Criminal Process About Truth?: A German Perspective。Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy,26,167-168+172-173。  new window
3.Herzog, Sergio(2003)。The Relationship Between Public Perceptions of Crime Seriousness and Support for Plea Bargaining Practice in Israel: A Factorial-Survey Approach。Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology,94,124。  new window
4.史衛忠(2003)。〈關於適用普通程序審理“被告人認罪案件”的若干意見(試行)〉、〈關於適用簡易程序審理公訴案件的若干意見〉的理解與適用。人民檢察,2003(6)。  延伸查詢new window
5.施鵬鵬(2008)。法國庭前認罪答辯程序評析。現代法學,2008(5)。  延伸查詢new window
6.Pizzi, William T.、Marafioti, Luca(1992)。The New Italian Code of Criminal Procedure: The Difficulties of Building an Adversarial Trial System on a Civil Law Foundation。Yale Journal of International Law,17,15。  new window
7.施鵬鵬(2006)。法國刑事和解程序及其借鑒意義。社會科學輯刊,2006(6)。  延伸查詢new window
8.施鵬鵬(2008)。在正當與效率之間:法國刑事調解程序述評。環球法律評論,2008(2)。  延伸查詢new window
9.張曉玲(2003)。刑事訴訟中的“程序分流”。政法論壇,2003(2)。  延伸查詢new window
10.Grande, Elisabetta(2000)。Italian Criminal Justice: Borrowing and Resistance。American Journal of Comparative Law,48(2),227-260。  new window
11.Amodio, Ennio、Selvaggi, Eugenio(1989)。An Accusatorial System in a Civil Law Country: The 1988 Italian Code of Criminal Procedure。Temple Law Review,62,1211。  new window
12.Langer, Maximo(2004)。From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure。Harvard International Law Journal,45,1-64。  new window
13.約阿希姆.赫爾曼、王世洲(2001)。德國刑事訴訟程序中的協商。環球法律評論,2001(冬)。  延伸查詢new window
14.Damaska, Mirjan(1975)。Structures of Authority and Comparative Criminal Procedure。Yale Law Journal,84,480-544。  new window
研究報告
1.澳門初級法院。初級法院2011年年度案件統計表。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.姜濤(2004)。刑事程序分流研究(博士論文)。中國政法大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張麗卿(200108)。刑事訴訟法理論與運用。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋英輝、孫長永、朴宗根(2011)。外國刑事訴訟法。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.克勞思‧羅科信、吳麗琪(2004)。刑事訴訟法。北京:法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉高龍、趙國強、駱偉建、范劍虹(2011)。澳門法律新論。北京:社會科學文獻出版社:澳門基金會。  延伸查詢new window
5.羅結珍(2006)。法國刑事訴訟法典。北京:中國法制出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.拖馬斯.魏根特、岳禮玲、溫小潔(2004)。德國刑事訴訟程序。北京:中國政法大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.簡查源(20111019)。修訂〈刑事訴訟法典〉的幾項建議。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳文戈,蔡小姍(20121018)。何超明:修訂刑法需審慎。  延伸查詢new window
3.澳門特別行政區政府行政長官辦公室。法案最初文本,http://www.al.gov.mo/proposta/pro-penal/cn.htm, 2012/11/13。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE