:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論傳聞證據之同意
書刊名:臺北大學法學論叢
作者:張明偉 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Ming-woei
出版日期:2016
卷期:97
頁次:頁179-233
主題關鍵詞:傳聞同意傳聞例外對質權異議公正審判Hearsay consentHearsay exceptionRight to confrontObjectionFair trial
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:6
期刊論文
1.張明偉(20110100)。傳聞法則之比較研究--以美國法為基礎。檢察新論,9,144-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Blumenthal, Jeremy A.(2001)。Shedding Some Light on Calls for Hearsay Reform: Civil Law Hearsay Rules in Historical and Modem Perspective。Pace Int'L L. Rev.,13,93。  new window
3.Kessel, Gordon Van(1998)。A Summary of Mirjan R. Damaska's Evidence Law Adrift。HASTINGS L. J.,49,359。  new window
4.Lemer, Renee Lettow(2001)。The Intersection of Two Systems: An American on Trial for an American Murder in the French Cout D'assise。U. ILL. L. Rev.,2001,791。  new window
5.McCormick, Charles T.(1956)。Law and the Future: Evidence。Nw. U. L. Rev.,51,218。  new window
6.Park, Roger C.(1998)。An Outsider's View of Common Law Evidence。Mich. L. Rev.,96,1486。  new window
7.Davis, Kenneth Culp(1964)。An Approach to Rules of Evidence for Non Jury Cases。A. B. A. J.,50,723-725。  new window
8.張明偉(20130200)。試探傳聞例外之法理基礎--以刑事訴訟法第一百五十九條之一為中心。政大法學評論,131,249-332。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.何賴傑(20041100)。傳聞法則之同意。月旦法學,114,85-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Landsman, Stephan(1990)。The Rise of the Contentious Spirit: Adversary Procedure in Eighteenth Century England。Cornell Law Review,75(2),497-609。  new window
11.吳元曜(20070800)。刑事訴訟法第一五九條之五同意作為證據規定在適用上之檢討。律師雜誌,335,77-91。  延伸查詢new window
12.吳巡龍(2010)。同意傳聞作為證據後再爭執。台灣法學雜誌,161。  延伸查詢new window
13.顧立雄、許純琪(20031200)。從美國法檢討我國傳聞法則之規定。法官協會雜誌,5(2),93-123。  延伸查詢new window
14.Gallanis, Thomas P.(1999)。The Rise of Modern Evidence Law。IOWA L. REV.,84,499。  new window
15.Lederer, Fredric I.(2005)。Technology-Augmented Courtrooms: Progress Amid a Few Complications, or the Problematic Interrelationship Between Court and Counsel。N. Y. U. ANN. SURV. AM. L.,60,675。  new window
研究報告
1.陳昭筠(2008)。論我國刑事訴訟法傳聞證據之同意。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Park, Roger C.(1998)。Evidence Law: A Student's Guide to the Law of Evidence as Applied in American Trials。  new window
2.Damaska, Mirjan R.(1997)。Evidence Law Adrift。  new window
3.Landsman, Stephan(1988)。Adversarial Justice: The American Approach to Adjudication。  new window
4.Mueller, Christopher B.、Kirkpatrick, Laird C.(2000)。Evidence under the Rules。  new window
5.Waltz, Jon R.、Park, Roger C.(1999)。Evidence。Foundation Press。  new window
6.Best, Authur(2001)。Evidence。Aspen。  new window
7.林鈺雄(2007)。刑事訴訟法。林鈺雄。  延伸查詢new window
8.林俊益(2011)。刑事訴訟法概論。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
9.朱石炎(2011)。刑事訴訟法論。三民。  延伸查詢new window
10.林永謀(2007)。刑事訴訟法釋論。臺北:林永謀。  延伸查詢new window
11.張麗卿(2010)。刑事訴訟法理論與運用。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
12.林朝榮、林芸澧(2005)。傳聞法則之比較研究。文笙出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Fenner, G. Michael(2002)。The Hearsay Rule。Carolina Academic Press。  new window
14.Allen, R. J.、Kuhns, R. B.、Swift, E.(2003)。Evidence: Text, Cases, and Problems。Sandy, UT:Aspen。  new window
15.Imwinkelried, E. J.(1989)。Evidentiary Foundations。Charlottesville, VA:Michie Company。  new window
16.BLOND, NEIL C.(1995)。BLOND'S CRIMINAL PROCEDURE。  new window
17.STRONG, JOHN W.(1999)。MCCORMICK ON EVIDENCE。  new window
18.土本武司、董璠輿、宋英輝(1997)。日本刑事訴訟法要義。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
19.王兆鵬、張明偉、李榮耕(2012)。刑事訴訟法。承法。  延伸查詢new window
20.黃朝義(2014)。刑事訴訟法。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Federal Rules Of Evidence--2011 Amendment To Restyle The Federal Rules Of Evidence,http://federalevidence.com/node/1051。  new window
2.FRE 801(d)(1)(B) Legislative History Page,http://federalevidence.com/node/1977。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳運財(2004)。傳聞法則之理論與實踐。傳聞法則:理論與實踐。台北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.林俊益(2003)。傳聞法則之研究。司法研究年報。司法院。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃朝義(2012)。從比較法觀點論同意證據與擬制同意證據--兼論合意證據。刑事法學現代化動向--黃東熊教授八秩華誕祝壽論文集。新學林出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE