:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以專利分析觀點探討臺韓造船產業領導廠商的技術發展
書刊名:產業與管理論壇
作者:徐龍和薛招治 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Lung-hoHsueh, Chao-chih
出版日期:2016
卷期:18:1
頁次:頁36-65
主題關鍵詞:臺灣國際造船公司專利分析現代重工造船產業CSBC corporationTaiwan(CSBC)Patent analysisHyundai heavy industriesShipbuilding industry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:22
造船產業是產業鏈整合發展的綜合性工業,主要工業國家均藉由發展造船產業以推動基礎工程科技,帶動相關產業發展及厚植國力。台灣造船產業雖有市場規模不大、土地及人工成本高等不利因素,但若能集中資源研發規劃,將有利於提升造船技術競爭力。因此,本研究藉由專利分析方法,比較台韓造船產業領導廠商─南韓現代重工及台灣國際造船公司之技術發展現況,探討具有全球造船領導地位的現代重工技術發展趨勢,以及專利技術布局現況,提供台灣造船產業技術發展之建議。專利資料至2013年8月為現代重工已核准及公開的769件南韓專利,以及台灣國際造船公司已核准之7 件中華民國專利。分析結果顯示,現代重工專利技術布局多元且聚焦,著重於製程技術、艤裝設備、船體結構、推進系統及LNG/LPG 運輸船等技術研發,以達成提升造船生產力、改善推進效能及提高結構性能等功效,全面性發展節能相關造船技術及提高生產力,藉以維持全球競爭優勢。反觀台灣國際造船公司在研發資源有限下,雖已研發商業化的節能相關推進技術,但未利用專利保護,無法形成公司的技術競爭力。最後,研究建議台灣造船產業應以節能推進技術為技術發展主軸。
Shipbuilding industry is a comprehensive industrial developed with the whole industry chain. Developed countries promoted the shipbuilding industry development policy to improve the infrastructure technology, to develop the related industries and upgrade the national defense competitiveness. The characteristics in Taiwan’s shipbuilding industry compared with the advanced industrial countries are that the market share is small, land and labor costs are high. However, we focus on the core technology development and resource planning to enhance the competitiveness of shipbuilding technology. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the status of technology development of leaders in Taiwanese and Korean shipbuilding industry- Hyundai Heavy Industries and CSBC Corporation, Taiwan by using patent analysis. The results could recommend for technology development of shipbuilding industry in Taiwan from analyzing the trend of technology development and the patent portfolio construction in the global shipbuilding company- Hyundai Heavy Industries. Hyundai Heavy Industries in South Korea had applied 769 patents from 1992 to 2013 and CSBC Corporation, Taiwan had applied 7 patents in Taiwan. Using the cross table analysis between technology efficacy and technical efficacy, the results showed that the patent portfolio in Hyundai Heavy Industries shipbuilding focused on manufacturing process, rigging equipment, shipbuilding structures, propulsion systems and LNG/LPG carriers. The technical efficacy focused on raising productivity, improving propulsion performance, and improving ship structure. On the other hand, based on the limited R&D resources, CSBC Corporation, Taiwan focus on green energy research of propulsion systems, but had not used patents to protect the invention. Finally, the study suggested Taiwan shipbuilding industry should promote the development of green energy technologies and strengthen the shipbuilding patent-related knowledge construction and patent personnel training.
期刊論文
1.莊景翔(2011)。IMO針對船舶節能減碳議題上的行動--EEDI、SEEMP and EEOI。台船月刊,423,23-27。  延伸查詢new window
2.魏蔚(2007)。韓國產業政策分析。亞非縱橫,6,42-46。  延伸查詢new window
3.Clarkson Research Services(20071213)。Orderbook by country/region。World Shipyard Monitor,14(12)。  new window
4.Clarkson Research Services(20081213)。Orderbook by country/region。World Shipyard Monitor,15(12)。  new window
5.Clarkson Research Services(20091213)。Orderbook by country/region。World Shipyard Monitor,16(12)。  new window
6.Clarkson Research Services(20101213)。Orderbook by country/region。World Shipyard Monitor,17(12)。  new window
7.Clarkson Research Services(20111213)。Orderbook by country/region。World Shipyard Monitor,15(12)。  new window
8.Clarkson Research Services(20121213)。Orderbook by country/region。World Shipyard Monitor,19(12)。  new window
9.Clarkson Research Services(20131213)。Orderbook by country/region。World Shipyard Monitor,20(12)。  new window
10.KORSHIP(20110805)。Highly sophisticated patented technology of Korean shipyards。KORSHIP,8,48-53。  new window
11.Sohn, E.、Chang, S. Y.、Song, J.(2009)。Technological catching-up and latecomer strategy: A case study of the Asian shipbuilding industry。Seoul Journal of Business,15(2),25-55。  new window
12.吳東明(1995)。我國造船產業市場研究與國際競爭策略分析。船舶科技,16,84-108。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Hyundai Heavy Industries(2013)。Hyundai Heavy Industries annual report 2012。  new window
學位論文
1.徐大成(2001)。我國中型造船廠之發展(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李駿翔(2003)。應用資料探勘分類技術於專利分析之研究(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳一平、王穆衡(2010)。船舶大型化趨勢對我國海運產業發展之影響分析。臺北:交通部運輸研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.李雅榮、鄭勝文(1986)。商船設計之基礎。台北:大中國圖書。  延伸查詢new window
3.Won, D. H.(2010)。A study of Korean shipbuilding strategy for sustainable growth。Cambridge, MA:Massachusetts Institute of Technology。  new window
4.陳政宏(2005)。造船風雲88年--從台船到中船的故事1916-2004。台北:行政院文化建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.日本国土交通省(2009)。船舶からのCO2削減技術開発支援事業の募集について,http://www.mlit.go.jp/maritime/senpaku/index.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.台灣國際造船公司(2013)。台灣國際造船公司101年年報,http://www.csbcnet.com.tw/csbc/07/data/101%E5%B9%B4%E5%A0%B1_1020529.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
3.財團法人船舶暨海洋產業研發中心(2013)。船舶中心2012年報,http://www.soic. org.tw/usddc3/chi/intro/intro_annuals.asp。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bae, Y. I.(2009)。Competitiveness of Korean shipbuilding industry and ways to strengthen its global leadership, industry report,file:///C:/Users/TOSHIBA/DownloadsAVI_20090209.pdf。  new window
5.International Maritime Organization(2011)。IMO and the environment,http://www.imo.org/ourwork/environment/documents/imo%20and%20the%20environment%202011.pdf。  new window
6.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2009)。Shipbuilding industry in Chinese Taipei,http://www.oecd.org/industry/ind/47500389.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top