:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:權利耗盡不耗盡--簡析數位著作次級市場之建構
書刊名:智慧財產權月刊
作者:胡心蘭 引用關係
出版日期:2016
卷期:209
頁次:頁26-60
主題關鍵詞:權利耗盡原則第一次銷售原則數位著作次級市場著作權濫用原則二手拍賣SLAEULA
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:9
利耗盡原則」或稱「第一次銷售原則」,在著作權法制內被視為是對 著作財產權─尤其是「散布權」之限制。著作權人專有以移轉所有權之方式散布 其著作之權利,但為使著作重製物得以自由流通,讓使用者充分的利用,著作 權法亦限制著作權人對於已進入市場的特定著作重製物再握有控制能力,即耗 盡其對著作重製物再行散布的權利。然而,由於數位著作有容易被複製、網路 散布無須載體等特性,數位著作著作權人多以「軟體授權契約(Software License Agreement, SLA)」、或「最終使用者授權契約(End User License Agreement, EULA)」對於其數位著作之使用設有嚴格之限制,尤其禁止使用人再行轉讓。 本文係針對在該等SLA、EULA 的適用下,數位著作是否有次級市場(如再轉售、 交易、交換等)之發展空間?使用者暨消費者、或硬體競爭對手可否主張著作權 濫用予以抗衡?並對未來數位著作次級市場之建構提供想像空間。
期刊論文
1.蔡岳勳、胡心蘭(20070400)。論美國數位千禧年著作權法中反規避濫用原則之發展。科技法學評論,4(1),103-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.胡心蘭(20130215)。從美國第九巡迴上訴法院近期案例初探數位環境下著作權耗盡原則。臺灣法學雜誌,218,54-62。  延伸查詢new window
3.Liu, J. P.(2001)。Owning Digital Copies: Copyright Law and the Incidents of Copy Ownership。WM. & MARY L. REV.,42(4),1245-1366。  new window
4.Reese, R. A.(2003)。The First Sale Doctrine in the Era of Digital Networks。B. C. L. REV.,44(2),577+582-583。  new window
5.胡心蘭(20141200)。數位著作授權契約對第一次銷售原則之影響與濫用原則之適用。智慧財產評論,12(2),47-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Rothchild, John A.(2011)。Exhausting Extraterritoriality。SANTA. CLARA L. REV.,51(4),1187-1239。  new window
7.Perzanowski, A.、Schultz, J.(2011)。Dugutal Exhaustion。UCLAL. REV.,58。  new window
8.Van Houweling, M. S.(2008)。The New Servitudes。GEO. L. J.,96(3)。  new window
9.Rotstein, R. H.、Evitt, E. F.、Williams, M.(2010)。The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age。Intell. Prop. & Tech. L. J.,22(3),23-24。  new window
10.Liu, J. P.(2001)。Owning Digital Copies: Copyright Law and the Incidents of Copy Ownership。WM. & MARY L. REV.,42(4),1245-1366。  new window
11.Leber, J.(2012)。A Startup Asks: Why Can′t You Resell Old Digital Songs? - Technology Review。MIT Tech. Rev.。  new window
12.Lemley, M. A.(1990)。The Economic Irrationality of the Patent Misuse Doctrine。Cal. L. Rev.,78,1599-1608。  new window
13.Soma, J. T.、Kugler, M. K.(2014)。Why Rent when You can Own? How ReDigi, Apple, and Amazon will use the Cloud and the Digital First Sale Doctrine to Resell Music, E-Books, Games, and Movies。N. C. J. L. & Tech.,15,425-446。  new window
14.Kawabata, B. M.(2014)。Unresolved Textual Tension: Capital Records v. ReDigi A Digital First Sale Doctrine。UCLA Ent. L. Rev.,21,33-55。  new window
15.Clifford, R. D.(2000)。Simultaneous Copyright and Trade Secret Claims: Can the Copyright Misuse Defense Prevent Constitutional Doublethink?。Dick. L. Rev.,104,247-258。  new window
16.Calkins, R.(1988)。Patent Law: The Impact to the 1988 Patent Misuse reform Act and Noerr-Pennington Doctrine on Misuse defenses and Antitrust Counterclaims。Drake L. Rev.,38,175。  new window
17.Burk, Dan L.(2003)。Anticircumvention Misuse。UCLA Law Review,50(5),1095-1114。  new window
18.Frischmann, B.、Moylan, D.(2000)。The Evolving Common Law Doctrine of Copyright Misuse: A United Theory and Its Application to Software。Berkeley Tech. L. J.,15,865-867。  new window
19.Hartzog, N.(2004)。Gaining Momentum: A Review of Recent Developments Surrounding the Expansion of the Copyright Misuse Doctrine and Analysis of the Doctrine mits Current Form。Mich. Telecomm Tech. L. Rev.,10,373-401。  new window
20.Paredes, T.(1994)。Copyright Misuse And Tying: Will Courts Stop Misusing Misuse?。High Tech. L. J.,9,271-275。  new window
21.White, James A. D.(1997)。Misuse or Fair Use: That is The Software Copyright Question。Berkeley Tech. L. J.,12,251-276。  new window
22.Minow, M.(2013)。Selling Used Digital Files: A Setback, But Not the End of the Story。Library Journal。  new window
23.Pallarte, M. A.(2013)。The Next Great Copyright Act。Colum J. L. & Arts,30,315。  new window
學位論文
1.胡心蘭(2001)。論科技發展對合理使用與著作財產權限制之影響(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Lichtman, Douglas(2010)。First Sale, First Principles,http://www. mediainstitute.org/IPI/2010/042610—FirstSale.php。  new window
2.(2001)。US COPYRIGHT OFFICE, DMCA SECTION 104 REPORT,http://www.copyright.gov/reports/studies/dmea/sec-104-report-vol-1.pdf。  new window
3.Redigi Issues Statement on Amazon's Patent For The Resale of Used Digital Goods,http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/redigi-issues-statement-on-amazons-patent-for-the-resale-of-used-digital-goods-190036661.html。  new window
4.Artists Get Paid for Secondary Sales with the ReDigi Syndication Program,http://www.redigi.com/syndication/。  new window
5.Indvik, Lauren(2013)。Apple and Amazon Lay Foundations for Used Digital Goods Stores,http://masnable.com/2013/03/08apple-amazon-used-goods-marketplaces/。  new window
6.Dodd, J.,Williams, R.(2011)。Recent Cases Should Make Software Licensors Review Their Distribution Methodsv and License Terms (and They May Even Make Us Look at Open Source Licenses in a Different Way),http://www.andrewskurth.com/pressroom-publications-804.html。  new window
7.Hoffelder, N.(20130502)。ReDigi Plans to Launch a Used eBook Marketplace Soon, Still Resells Used Digital Music,http://the-digital-reader.com/2013/05/02redigi-plans-to-launch-a-used-ebook-marketplace-soon-still-sells-used-music-under-novel-legal-theory/。  new window
8.Brief of Amici Curiae American Library Association(2011)。Association of College and Research Libraries, Association of Research Libraries, Consumer Federation of America, Electronic Frontier Fondation,http://www.eff.org/files/Vernorfinal.pdf。  new window
9.Peckham, M.(2013)。Time Interview, ReDigi CEO Says the Court Just Snatched Away Your Right to Resell What You Legally Own,http://techland.time.com/2013/04/25redigi-ceo-says-the-court-just-snatched-away-your-right-to-resell-what-you-legally-own/。  new window
10.Sanders, R.(2012)。Music Industry V. ReDigi: Cute or Clever?,http://ipbreakdown.com/blog/music-industry-v-redigi-cute-or-clever。  new window
11.Picker, R. C.(2011)。Apple v. Psystar: Software Licensing, The First-Sale Coctrine, and Copyright Misuse, The Media,http://www.mediainstitute-org/IPI/2011/100311.php。  new window
12.Balasubramani, V.(2011)。Court Rejects Copyright Misuse Defense Against Apple and Affirms License Restrictions in OS X License Agreement--Apple v. Psystar,http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/10/apple_v_psystar.htm。  new window
13.(2014)。Written Testimony of John Ossenmacher, Before the House Subcommittee on Court, Intellectual Property, and the Internet Hearing on "First Sale Under Title 17",http://judiciary.house.gov/_cache/files/74d5d591-6c07-4fe8-a381-e025d9091a79/060214-first-sale-testimony-ossenmacher.pdf。  new window
14.Sweigart, R. L.(2012)。Could Software Imports from Europe Bypass U. S. First Sale and IP Exhaustion Laws?,http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/could-software-imports-from-europe-bypas-07612。  new window
15.Methods and apparatus for snoring, transferring and removing previously owned digital media,http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sectl=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&1=50&s1=9021608.PN.&OS=PN/9021608&RS=PN/9021608。  new window
16.Why do I need a Muitation to join?,http://www.redigi.com//site/index-invite.html。  new window
17.Downes, L.(2010)。The End of Software Ownership--And Why to Smile,http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-20016864-92.html。  new window
18.(20130307)。U.S. Patent Application, No. 20130060616, Managing Access to Digital Content Items,http:/ /appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sectl=PT02&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtni1%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=5&p=l&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&Sl=%2Sapple.AS.+AND+20130307.PD.%29&OS-an/apple+and+pd/3/7/2013&RS=%28AN/apple+AND+PD/20130307%29。  new window
19.United States Patent, No. 8,364,595, Secondary market for digital objects,http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sec1=PTOl&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtm1%2FPTO%2Fsrehnum.htm&r=l&f=G&l=50&sl=8,365,595.PN/8,364,595。  new window
圖書論文
1.胡心蘭(2014)。美國Wiley案對我國著作權耗盡原則之啟發。國際比較下我國著作權法之總檢討。中央研究院法律學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sweazey, P.(2012)。Introduction to Digital Personal Property, Originally published。Consumers in the Information Society: Access, Fairness and Pepresentation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE