:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中學數學實習教師之學生參與概念心像探究
書刊名:臺灣數學教育期刊
作者:謝佳叡 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh, Chia-jui
出版日期:2014
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁1-24
主題關鍵詞:學生參與數學教學概念心像數學實習教師Student engagementConcept image for mathematics teachingMathematics intern teacher
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:11
本研究試圖從數學教學概念心像的角度,探討中學數學實習教師在面對數學教學問題時,所展現出的教學決策與其背後認知結構。在各個不同的教學面向中,本文從學生參與面向出發,檢視中學數學實習教師在面對教學問題時所喚起之數學教學概念心像,以及其與教學決策之間的關聯。研究資料收集主要採用問卷調查方式,研究樣本則採方便取樣對2009年1月之臺師大數學實習教師進行普測,共計回收有效問卷62份。資料分析方式主要採取內容分析、歸納分析等方法。研究的主要發現包含:一、臺灣中學數學實習教師在學生參與面向概念心像的自發展現中,主要呈現讓學生專注課堂、讓學生自主學習,以及教學生活化等三種類型。二、對於學生參與的程度與方式,實習教師首重於學生的情感參與,在作法上則多偏向將課程與生活做連結。三、在含教學情境問題方面,半數以上的實習教師在新概念引入教學上展現出學生參與的心像,其中又以情感參與為主;而在學生不專心上課的處理上,大多數的實習教師則與行為參與產生聯繫,其次才是情感參與,此現象也反映出不同的教學情境將喚起實習教師不同的學生參與心像。研究也發現多數展現學生參與心像的實習教師也經常伴隨著其他面向的概念心像,尤其在學生情意面向心像與教學方法面向。
While observing teachers working, we found that they must make numerous decisions in managing the teaching situations that can occur within only a few moments. Based on the concept image for mathematics teaching (CIMT), this study investigated the bases on which secondary school intern teachers of mathematics in Taiwan choose certain strategies when engaging in teaching tasks, and examined the cognitive structure of the responses. This paper addresses student engagement in the mathematics classroom and the type of CIMT that is evoked when mathematics intern teachers engage in tasks related to mathematics instruction. We found that (a) through various teaching concepts, most intern teachers seldom spontaneously evoke the concept images of student engagement; (b) most intern teachers lay particular stress on students’ emotional engagement and their connection between the curriculum and real-life experience; and (c) in practical teaching situations, intern teachers emphasize emotional engagement when introducing a new concept, but emphasize behavioral engagement when students do not concentrate in class. This study also established that most intern teachers who evoke the image of student engagement generally evoke the image of student affection and the image of teaching methods at the same time.
期刊論文
1.Glanville, Jennifer L.、Wildhagen, Tina(2007)。The measurement of school engagement: Assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity。Educational and Psychological Measurement,67(6),1019-1041。  new window
2.Miserandino, M.(1996)。Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children。Journal of Educational Psychology,88(2),203-214。  new window
3.Fredricks, Jennifer A.、Blumenfeld, Phyllis C.、Paris, Alison H.(2004)。School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence。Review of Educational Research,74(1),59-109。  new window
4.Attard, Catherine(2013)。''If I had to pick any subject, it wouldn't be maths'': Foundations for engagement with mathematics during the middle years。Mathematics Education Research Journal,25(4),569-587。  new window
5.Carter, C. P.、Reschly, A. L.、Lovelace, M. D.、Appleton, J. J.、Thompson, D.(2012)。Measuring student engagement among elementary students: Pilot of the student engagement instrument--Elementary version。School Psychology Quarterly,27(2),61-73。  new window
6.Griffin, L.、Dodds, P.、Rovegno, I.(1996)。Pedagogical content knowledge for teachers: Integrate everything you know to help students learn。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,67(9),58-61。  new window
7.Niess, M. L.(2005)。Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge。Teaching and Teacher Education,21(5),509-523。  new window
8.Skinner, E. A.、Belmont, M. J.(1993)。Motivation in classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year。Journal of Educational Psychology,85(4),571-581。  new window
9.Smith, K. A.、Sheppard, S. D.、Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R. T.(2005)。Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices。Journal of Engineering Education,94(1),1-15。  new window
10.Tall, D.、Vinner, S.(1981)。Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity。Educational Studies in Mathematics,12(2),151-169。  new window
11.Parsons, Jim、Taylor, Leah(2011)。Improving student engagement。Current Issues in Education,14(1),1-33。  new window
12.Shulman, L. S.(1987)。Knowledge and teaching: foundation of the new reform。Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-22。  new window
13.Cochran, K. F.、DeRuiter, J. A.、King, R. A.(1993)。Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation。Journal of Teacher Education,44(4),263-272。  new window
14.Meece, Judith L.、Blumenfeld, Phyllis C.、Hoyle, Rock H.(1988)。Students' Goal Orientations and Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Activities。Journal of Educational Psychology,80(4),514-523。  new window
15.Appleton, James J.、Christenson, Sandra L.、Furlong, Michael J.(2008)。Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct。Psychology in the Schools,45(5),369-386。  new window
16.Vinner, S.(1983)。Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function。International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,14(3),293-305。  new window
17.Carini, R. M.、Kuh, G. D.、Klein, S. P.(2006)。Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages。Research in Higher Education,47(1),1-32。  new window
18.Chapman, Elaine(2002)。Alternative Approaches to Assessing Student Engagement Rates。Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation,8(1),(13)1-(13)7。  new window
19.Patrick, B. C.、Skinner, E. A.、Connell, J. P.(1993)。What motivates children's behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,65(4),781-791。  new window
研究報告
1.林福來(1997)。教學思維的發展:整合數學教學知識的教材教法 (計畫編號:NSC 86-2511-S-003-025)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學數學系。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱美虹(1997)。國中科學教師特質與其檢定之研究(I):比較初任科學教師與資深科學教師知識與技能表現 (計畫編號:NSC-84-2513-S-003-004)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林進材(1996)。國民小學教師教學思考之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝佳叡(2011)。中學數學實習教師之數學教學概念心像探究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝佳叡(2001)。國中生配方法學習歷程中之數學思維研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Newmann, F. M.(1992)。Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools。Teachers College Press。  new window
2.Christenson, S. L.、Reschly, A. L.、Wylie, C.(2012)。Handbook of research on student engagement。Springer Science & Business Media。  new window
3.Mosher, R.、McGowan, B.(1985)。Assessing student engagement in secondary schools: alternative conceptions, strategies of assessing, and instruments。Research and Development Center, University of Wisconsin。  new window
4.孔企平(2003)。數學教學過程中的學生參與。上海:華東師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部(2010)。國民中學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
6.Biggs, J. B.(1987)。Student approaches to learning and studying。Hawthorn:Australian Council for Educational Research。  new window
7.Grossman, P. L.(1991)。The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
8.Jackson, P. W.(1968)。Life in classroom。New York, NY:Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
9.National Council of Teacher of Mathematics(1991)。Professional standards for teaching mathematics。Reston, VA:National Council of Teacher of Mathematics。  new window
10.Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀、李奉儒(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Connell, J. P.(1990)。Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life-span。The self in transition: Infancy to childhood。Chicago, Illinois:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Atkinson, J. W.(1965)。Some general implications of conceptual developments in the study of achievement-oriented behavior。Human motivation: A symposium。Lincoln:University of Nebraska Press。  new window
3.Erickson, F.、Shultz, J.(1992)。Students' experience of the curriculum。Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American educational research association。New York, NY:Macmillan Press。  new window
4.Ernest, P.(1989)。The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics。Mathematics teaching: The state of the art。London:Falmer Press。  new window
5.Nystrand, M.、Gamoran, A.(1991)。Student engagement: When recitation becomes conversation。Effective teaching: Current research。Berleley, CA:McCutchan Publishing Corporation。  new window
6.Pintrich, P. R.、Schrauben, B.(1992)。Student motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in academic classroom tasks。Student perceptions in the classroom。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
7.Vinner, S.(1991)。The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics。Advanced mathematical thinking。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE