同儕審查的起源、研究現況與展望__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	同儕審查的起源、研究現況與展望
書刊名：	圖書資訊學刊
作者：	黃慕萱／嚴竹蓮
作者(外文)：	Huang, Mu-hsuan／Yen, Chu-lien
出版日期：	2016
卷期：	14:1
頁次：	頁41-85
主題關鍵詞：	同儕審查；書目計量；Peer review；Bibliometrics
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:0 點閱:19

同儕審查是學術界進行科學探索時所採用的一項自律機制，幾乎已制度化地納入學術組織的運作之中，並普遍獲得學界人士的支持。基本上同儕審查的正當性是基於學術社群成員之間的信賴與誠信，在各項學術活動中以不同的作業模式分配有限資源，包括學術文獻出版、研究計畫獎助、大學教職聘用與升遷，以及學術成就獎勵等。但是同儕審查的運作方式迄今未臻完善，除了出現效用、效率，以及信度等問題外，許多研究亦已證實存在多種評審者偏見，因此有愈來愈多的學者主張對同儕審查進行持續性地檢驗與監督，以提升評審作業的品質與公平性。本文透過文獻分析論述同儕審查在學術領域的應用與研究，首先說明同儕審查的定義、分類與優缺點，並以學術期刊稿件、獎助計畫，以及大學教職聘用／升遷之同儕審查為例，探討同儕審查的起源、發展與研究現況，最後分析同儕審查的國際合作及其與書目計量的關係。

以文找文

Peer review is a self-regulation mechanism for scientific inquiry. Institutionalized and incorporated into the structure and operation of science, it has received considerable support in the academic setting. The legitimacy of peer review is based on trust and integrity. In various ways, it allocates scarce resources such as journal space, research funding, faculty recruitment, recognition, and rewards for academic achievements. But there are growing indications that peer review has yet to fulfill its potential functions, leading to negative assessments as to whether it is effective, efficient, or reliable. Many studies have found links between potential sources of bias and judgments in peer review and expressed reservations over the fairness of the process. It is, therefore, important that the peer review process should be subjected to serious scrutiny and regular evaluation that would lead to better quality and greater fairness. This study presents a systematic review of the empirical literature on peer review of journal manuscripts, grant applications, and faculty appointments and promotions. Historical and contextual information is provided as a basis for interpreting this review. Finally, the authors discuss international recommendations for good practice in peer review and the potential and problems of peer review and bibliometrics.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	van Raan, A. F. J.(1996)。Advanced Bibliometric Methods as Quantitative Core of Peer Review Based Evaluation and Foresight Exercises。Scientometrics，36(3)，397-420。
2.	Wouters, P.(1997)。Citation Cycles and Peer Review Cycles。Scientometrics，38(1)，39-55。
3.	Peters, D. P.、Ceci, S. J.(1982)。Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again。Behavioral and Brain Sciences，5(2)，187-195。
4.	Abdoul, H.、Perrey, C.、Amiel, P.、Tubach, F.、Gottot, S.、Durand-Zaleski, I.、Alberti, C.(2012)。Peer review of grant applications: Criteria used and qualitative study of reviewer practices。PLoS ONE，7(9)，e46054。
5.	Abdoul, H.、Perrey, C.、Tubach, F.、Amiel, P.、Durand-Zaleski, I.、Alberti, C.(2012)。Non-financial conflicts of interest in academic grant evaluation: A qualitative study of multiple stakeholders in France。PLoS ONE，7(4)，e35247。
6.	Abramo, G.、D'Angelo, C. A.(2011)。Evaluating research: From informed peer review to bibliometrics。Scientometrics，87(3)，499-514。
7.	Altman, L. K.(1996)。The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review。The Lancet，347(9012)，1382-1386。
8.	Baxt, W. G.、Waeckerle, J. F.、Berlin, J. A.、Callaham, M. L.(1998)。Who reviews the reviewers? Feasibility of using a fictitious manuscript to evaluate peer reviewer performance。Annals of Emergency Medicine，32(3)，310-317。
9.	Bell, S.、Shaw, B.、Boaz, A.(2011)。Real-world approaches to assessing the impact of environmental research on policy。Research Evaluation，20(3)，227-237。
10.	Bertocchi, G.、Gambardella, A.、Jappelli, T.、Nappi, C. A.、Peracchi, F.(2015)。Bibliometric evaluation vs. informed peer review: Evidence from Italy。Research Policy，44(2)，451-466。
11.	Bertout, C.、Schneider, P.(2004)。Editorship and peer-review at A&A。Astronomy and Astrophysics，420(3)，E1。
12.	Bhattacharya, A.(2012)。Science funding: Duel to the death。Nature，488(7409)，20-22。
13.	Biagioli, M.(2002)。From book censorship to academic peer review。Emergences: Journal for the Study of Media & Composite Cultures，12(1)，11-45。
14.	Bloch, C.、Graversen, E. K.、Pedersen, H. S.(2014)。Competitive research grants and their impact on career performance。Minerva，52(1)，77-96。
15.	Bornmann, L.(2010)。Does the journal peer review select the "best" from the work submitted? The state of empirical research。IETE Technical Review，27(2)，93-96。
16.	Bornmann, L.(2011)。Scientific peer review。Annual Review of Information Science and Technology，45(1)，197-245。
17.	Bornmann, L.(2012)。Measuring the societal impact of research。EMBO Reports，13(8)，673-676。
18.	Bornmann, L.(2013)。Evaluations by peer review in science。Springer Science Reviews，2013(1)，1-4。
19.	Bornmann, L.(2013)。What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，64(2)，217-233。
20.	Bornmann, L.、Daniel, H.-D.(2005)。Criteria used by a peer review committee for selection of research fellows: A Boolean probit analysis。International Journal of Selection and Assessment，13(4)，296-303。
21.	Bornmann, L.、Daniel, H.-D.(2008)。The effectiveness of the peer review process: Inter-referee agreement and predictive validity of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie。Angewandte Chemie International Edition，47(38)，7173-7178。
22.	Bornmann, L.、Daniel, H.-D.(2010)。Reliability of reviewers' ratings when using public peer review: A case study。Learned Publishing，23(2)，124-131。
23.	Bornmann, L.、Leydesdorff, L.、van den Besselaar, P.(2010)。A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications。Journal of Informetrics，4(3)，211-220。
24.	Bornmann, L.、Marx, W.(2014)。How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations。Scientometrics，98(1)，487-509。
25.	Bornmann, L.、Marx, W.、Schier, H.、Thor, A.、Daniel, H.-D.(2010)。From black box to white box at open access journals: Predictive validity of manuscript reviewing and editorial decisions at Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics。Research Evaluation，19(2)，105-118。
26.	Bornmann, L.、Mutz, R.、Daniel, H.-D.(2008)。Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review。Journal of Informetrics，2(3)，217-228。
27.	Bornmann, L.、Nast, I.、Daniel, H.-D.(2008)。Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication。Scientometrics，77(3)，415-432。
28.	Bozeman, B.、Boardman, C.(2009)。Broad impacts and narrow perspectives: Passing the buck on science and social impacts。Social Epistemology，23(3/4)，183-198。
29.	Brooks, J. H.(1988)。Confidentiality of tenure review and discovery of peer review materials。Brigham Young University Law Review，1988(4)，706-752。
30.	Brown, R. S.、Kurland, J. E.(1990)。Academic tenure and academic freedom。Law and Contemporary Problems，53(3)，325-355。
31.	Burnham, J. C.(1990)。The evolution of editorial peer review。Journal of the American Medical Association，263(10)，1323-1329。
32.	Burnham, J. C.、Sauer, J. E.、Gibbs, R. D.(1987)。Peer-reviewed grants in U.S. trade association research。Science, Technology, & Human Values，12(2)，42-51。
33.	Cabezas-Clavijo, Á.、Robinson-García, N.、Escabias, M.、Jiménez-Contreras, E.(2013)。Reviewers' ratings and bibliometric indicators: Hand in hand when assessing over research proposals?。PLoS ONE，8(6)，e68258。
34.	Cameron, M.(2010)。Faculty tenure in academe: The evolution, benefits and implications of an important tradition。Journal of Student Affairs at New York University，4，1-11。
35.	Chubin, D. E.(1994)。Grants peer review in theory and practice。Evaluation Review，18(1)，20-30。
36.	Cicchetti, D. V.(1991)。The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation。Behavioral and Brain Sciences，14(1)，119-135。
37.	Cicchetti, D. V.(1997)。Referees, editors, and publication practices: Improving the reliability and usefulness of the peer review system。Science and Engineering Ethics，3(1)，51-62。
38.	Cole, S.、Cole, J. R.、Simon, G. A.(1981)。Chance and consensus in peer review。Science，214(4523)，881-886。
39.	Collins, F. S.、Tabak, L. A.(2014)。Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility。Nature，505(7485)，612-613。
40.	Cozzens, S. E.(1999)。Are new accountability rules bad for science?。Issues in Science and Technology，15(4)。
41.	Daniel, H.-D.(2005)。Publications as a measure of scientific advancement and of scientists' productivity。Learned Publishing，18，143-148。
42.	De Vries, D. R.、Marschall, E. A.、Stein, R. A.(2009)。Exploring the peer review process: What is it, does it work, and can it be improved?。Fisheries，34(6)，270-279。
43.	Donovan, C.(2011)。State of the art in assessing research impact: Introduction to a special issue。Research Evaluation，20(3)，175-179。
44.	Eckberg, D. L.(1991)。When nonreliability of reviews indicates solid science。Behavioral and Brain Sciences，14(1)，145-146。
45.	Fairweather, J.(2005)。Beyond the rhetoric: Trends in the relative value of teaching and research in faculty salaries。The Journal of Higher Education，76(4)，401-422。
46.	Fang, H.(2011)。Peer review and over-competitive research funding fostering mainstream opinion to monopoly。Scientometrics，87，293-301。
47.	Ford, E.(2013)。Defining and characterizing open peer review: A review of the literature。Journal of Scholarly Publishing，44(4)，311-326。
48.	Frodeman, R.、Briggle, A.(2012)。The dedisciplining of peer review。Minerva，50(1)，3-19。
49.	Garfield, E.、Welljamsdorof, A.(1992)。Citation data--Their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making。Current Contents，49，5-13。
50.	Geisler, E.(2001)。The mires of research evaluation。The Scientist，15(10)，39。
51.	Gibson, M.、Spong, C. Y.、Simonsen, S. E.、Martin, S.、Scott, J. R.(2008)。Author perception of peer review。Obstetrics & Gynecology，112(3)，646-652。
52.	Gillett, R.(1993)。Prescriptions for medical research II--Is medical research well served by peer review?。British Medical Journal，306(6893)，1672-1675。
53.	Giraudeau, B.、Leyrat, C.、Le Gouge, A.、Léger, J.、Caille, A.(2011)。Peer review of grant applications: A simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews。PLoS ONE，6(11)，e27557。
54.	Godlee, F.、Gale, C. R.、Martyn, C. N.(1998)。Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: A randomized controlled trial。Journal of the American Medical Association，280(3)，237-240。
55.	Goldman, R. L.(1994)。The reliability of peer assessments: A meta-analysis。Evaluation & the Health Professions，17，3-21。
56.	Greenbank, P.(2006)。The academic's role: The need for re-evaluation?。Teaching in Higher Education，11(1)，107-112。
57.	Gross-Schaefer, A.、Gala, S.、Jaccard, J.、Vetter, L.(2015)。Being honest about tenure in the United States: The need for tenure system reform within institutions of higher education。International Journal of Social Science Studies，3(4)，25-36。
58.	Henly, S. J.、Dougherty, M. C.(2009)。Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research。Nurs Outlook，57，18-26。
59.	Hicks, D. M.、Katz, J. S.(1996)。Where is science going?。Science, Technology & Human Values，21(4)，379-406。
60.	Hodgson, C.(1997)。How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems。Journal of Clinical Epidemiology，50(11)，1189-1195。
61.	Hojat, M.、Gonnella, J. B.、Caelleigh, A.(2003)。Impartial judgment by the “gatekeepers" of science: Fallibility and accountability in the peer review process。Advances in Health Sciences Education，8(1)，75-96。
62.	Holbrook, J. B.(2010)。The use of societal impacts considerations in grant proposal peer review: A comparison of five models。Technology & Innovation，12(3)，213-224。
63.	Holbrook, J. B.(2013)。What is interdisciplinary communication? Reflections on the very idea of disciplinary integration。Synthese，190(11)，1865-1879。
64.	Holbrook, J. B.、Frodeman, R.(2011)。Peer review and the ex ante assessment of societal impacts。Research Evaluation，20(3)，239-246。
65.	Holbrook, J. B.、Hrotic, S.(2013)。Blue skies, impacts, and peer review。Roars Transactions, a Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation，1(1)。
66.	Hornbostel, S.、Böhmer, S.、Klingsporn, B.、Neufeld, J.、Von Ins, M.(2009)。Funding of young scientist and scientific excellence。Scientometrics，79(1)，171-190。
67.	Horrobin, D. F.(1996)。Peer review of grant applications: A harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research。The Lancet，348，1293-1295。
68.	Huutoniemi, K.、Klein, J. T.、Bruun, H.、Hukkinen, J.(2010)。Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators。Research Policy，39(1)，79-88。
69.	Jayasinghe, U. W.、Marsh, H. W.、Bond, N.(2006)。A new reader trial approach to peer review in funding research grants: An Australian experiment。Scientometrics，69(3)，591-606。
70.	Jefferson, T.、Rudin, M.、Brodney-Folse, S.、Davidoff, F.(2007)。Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies。Cochrane Database of Methodology Reviews，18(2)，MR000016。
71.	Justice, A. C.、Cho, M. K.、Winker, M. A.、Berlin, J. A.、Rennie, D.、PEER Investigators(1998)。Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial。Journal of the American Medical Association，280(3)，240-242。
72.	Kamenetzky, J. R.(2012)。Opportunities for impact: Statistical analysis of the National Science Foundation ‘s broader impacts criterion。Science and Public Policy，40(1)，72-84。
73.	Kostoff, R. N.(1995)。Federal research impact assessment: Axioms, approaches, applications。Scientometrics，34(2)，163-206。
74.	Kronick, D. A.(1990)。Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism。Journal of the American Medical Association，263(10)，1321-1322。
75.	Laloë, F.、Mosseri, R.(2009)。Bibliometric evaluation of individual researchers: Not even right...not even wrong!。Europhysics News，40(5)，26-29。
76.	Langfeldt, L.(2001)。The decisionmaking constraints and processes of grant peer review, and their effects on the review outcome。Social Studies of Science，31(6)，820-841。
77.	Langfeldt, L.(2006)。The policy challenges of peer review: Managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments。Research Evaluation，15(1)，31-41。
78.	Langfeldt, Liv、Kyvik, Svein(2011)。Researchers as evaluators: Tasks, tensions and politics。Higher Education，62(2)，199-212。
79.	Ledin, A.、Bornmann, L.、Gannon, F.、Wallon, G.(2007)。A persistent problem。EMBO Reports，8(11)，982-987。
80.	Lee, C. J.、Sugimoto, C. R.、Zhang, G.、Cronin, B.(2013)。Bias in peer review。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，64(1)，2-17。
81.	Levy, J.(1984)。Peer review: The continual need for reassessment。Cancer Investigation，2(4)，311-320。
82.	Luukkonen, T.(2012)。Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices。Research Evaluation，21，48-60。
83.	Manske, P. T.(1997)。A review of peer review。Journal of Hand Surgery，22A(5)，767-771。
84.	Marsh, H. W.、Jayasinghe, U. W.、Bond, N. W.(2008)。Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability。American Psychologist，63(3)，160-168。
85.	Marsh, H. W.、Jayasinghe, U. W.、Bond, N. W.(2011)。Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis mode。Journal of Informetrics，5，167-181。
86.	Martin, B. R.(2011)。The research excellence framework and the "impact agenda": Are we creating a Frankenstein monster?。Research Evaluation，20(3)，247-254。
87.	Martin, Ben R.、Irvine, John(1983)。Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy。Research Policy，12(2)，61-90。
88.	McNutt, R. A.、Evans, A. T.、Fletcher, R. H.、Fletcher, S. W.(1990)。The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial。Journal of the American Medical Association，263(10)，1371-1376。
89.	Mervis, J.(2011)。Beyond the data。Science，334(6053)，169-171。
90.	Metzger, W. P.(1990)。The 1940 statement of principles on academic freedom and tenure。Law and Contemporary Problems，53(3)，3。
91.	Miller, D. A.(1978)。Criteria for appointment, promotion, and retention of faculty in graduate social work programs。Journal of Education for Social Work，14(2)，74-81。
92.	Mutz, R.、Bornmann, L.、Daniel, H.-D.(2015)。Testing for fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multi-level multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex-ante and ex-post peer evaluation data from the Austrian Science Fund。Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology，66(11)，2321-2339。
93.	Nickerson, R. S.(2005)。What authors want from journal reviewers and editors。American Psychologist，60，661-662。
94.	Nylenna, M.、Riis, P.、Karlsson, Y.(1994)。Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts: Effects of referee characteristics and publication language。Journal of the American Medical Association，272(2)，149-151。
95.	Kreber, C.(2002)。Controversy and consensus on the scholarship of teaching。Studies in Higher Education，27(2)，151-167。
96.	Olbrecht, M.、Bornmann, L.(2010)。Panel peer review of grant applications: What do we know from research in social psychology on judgment and decisionmaking in groups?。Research Evaluation，19(4)，293-304。
97.	Opthof, T.、Wilde, A. A. M.(2009)。The Hirsch-index: A simple, new tool for the assessment of scientific output of individual scientists: The case of Dutch professors in clinical cardiology。Netherlands Heart Journal，17(4)，145-154。
98.	Oxman, A. D.、Guyatt, G. H.、Singer, J.、Goldsmith, G. H.、Hutchison, B. G.、Milner, R. A.、Streiner, D. L.(1991)。Agreement among reviewers of review articles。Journal of Clinical Epidemiology，44，91-98。
99.	Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology(2002)。Peer review。Postnote，182，1-4。
100.	Perper, T.(1989)。The loss of innovation: Peer review in multi- and interdisciplinary research。Issues in Integrative Studies，7，21-56。
101.	Polanyi, M.(1962)。The republic of science。Minerva，1(1)，54-73。
102.	Pouris, A.(1988)。Peer review in scientifically small countries。R&D Management，18(4)，333-340。
103.	Powell, K.(2010)。Making the cut。Nature，467，383-385。
104.	Pratt, D.(1997)。Reconceptualising the evaluation of teaching in higher education。Higher Education，34，23-33。
105.	Rennie, D.(1986)。Guarding the guardians: A conference on editorial peer review。Journal of the American Medical Association，256(17)，2391-2392。
106.	Rennie, D.(1998)。Freedom and responsibility in medical publication: Setting the balance right。Journal of the American Medical Association，280(3)，300-302。
107.	Rennie, D.(1998)。The present state of medical journals。The Lancet，352，18-22。
108.	Rip, A.(2000)。Higher forms of nonsense。European Review，8(4)，467-485。
109.	Roberts, M. R.(2009)。Realizing societal benefit from academic research: Analysis of the National Science Foundation's broader impacts criterion。Social Epistemology，23(3/4)，199-219。
110.	Roy, R.(1985)。Funding science: The real defects of peer-review and an alternative to it。Science, Technology, & Human Values，52，73-81。
111.	Sandström, U.、Hallsten, M.(2007)。Persistent nepotism in peer-review。Scientometrics，74(2)，175-189。
112.	Sieber, J. E.(2006)。How can we research peer review?。Nature。
113.	Smith, R. W.(2009)。In search of an optimal peer review system。Journal of Participatory Medicine，1，e13。
114.	Smith, R.、Rennie, D.(1995)。And now, evidence based editing。BMJ，311(7009)，826-827。
115.	Snodgrass, R.(2006)。Single- versus doubleblind reviewing: An analysis of the literature。Sigmod Record，35，8-21。
116.	Spier, R.(2002)。The history of the peer-review process。Trends in Biotechnology，20(8)，357-358。
117.	Spier, R.(2002)。Peer review and innovation。Science and Engineering Ethics，8，99-108。
118.	Strieker, L. J.(1991)。Disagreement among journal reviewers: No cause for undue alarm。Behavioral and Brain Sciences，14(1)，163-164。
119.	Travis, G. D. L.、Collins, H. M.(1991)。New light on old boys: Cognitive and institutional particularism in the peer review system。Science, Technology, & Human Values，16(3)，322-341。
120.	Van Arensbergen, P.、van der Weijden, I.、van den Besselaar, P.(2014)。Different views on scholarly talent: What are the talents we are looking for in science?。Research Evaluation，23，273-284。
121.	Van den Besselaar, P.、Leydesdorff, L.(2009)。Past performance, peer review and project selection: A case study in the social and behavioral sciences。Research Evaluation，18(4)，273-288。
122.	Van der Meulen, B.、Rip, A.(2000)。Evaluation of societal quality of public sector research in the Netherlands。Research Evaluation，9(1)，11-25。
123.	Van Rooyen, S.、Black, N.、Godlee, F.(1999)。Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts。Journal of Clinical Epidemiology，52(7)，625-629。
124.	Van Rooyen, S.、Delamothe, T.、Evans, S. J. W.(2010)。Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: Randomised controlled trial。BMJ，341，c5729。
125.	Van Rooyen, S.、Godlee, F.、Evans, S.、Smith, R.、Black, N.(1998)。Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial。Journal of the American Medical Association，280(3)，234-237。
126.	Weinbach, R. W.、Randolph, J. L.(1984)。Ratings: Peer review for tenure and promotion in professional schools。Improving College and University Teaching，32(2)，81-86。
127.	Weiser, I.(2012)。Peer review in the tenure and promotion process。College Composition and Communication，63(4)，645-672。
128.	Wennerås, C.、Wold, A.(1997)。Nepotism and sexism in peer-review。Nature，387(6631)，341-343。
129.	Wessely, S.(1998)。Peer review of grant applications: What do we know?。The Lancet，352(9124)，301-305。
130.	Williamson, A.(2003)。What will happen to peer review?。Learned Publishing，16(1)，15-20。
131.	Yalow, R. S.(1982)。Competency testing for reviewers and editors。Behavioral and Brain Sciences，5(2)，244-245。
132.	Young, Pat(2006)。Out of balance: Lecturers' perceptions of differential status and rewards in relation to teaching and research。Teaching in Higher Education，11(2)，191-202。
133.	Zuckerman, H.、Merton, R. K.(1971)。Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system。Minerva，9(1)，66-100。
134.	van Raan, A. F. J.(2005)。Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods。Scientometrics，62(1)，133-143。
135.	Merton, R. K.(1988)。The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property。ISIS，79(4)，606-623。
136.	Milem, Jeffrey F.、Berger, Joseph B.、Dey, Eric L.(2000)。Faculty time allocation: A study of change over twenty years。The Journal of Higher Education，71(4)，454-475。
137.	Smith, Linda C.(1981)。Citation Analysis。Library Trends，30(1)，83-106。
138.	Bornmann, L.、Daniel, H.-D.(2008)。What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior。The Journal of Documentation，64(1)，45-80。
139.	Horrobin, David F.(1990)。The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation。Journal of the American Medical Association，263(10)，1438-1441。
140.	Garfield, E.、Sher, I. H.(1963)。New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing。American Documentation，14(3)，195-201。
141.	Weingart, P.(2005)。Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?。Scientometrics，62(1)，117-131。
142.	Peters, H. P. F.、Van Raan, A. F. J.(1994)。On determinants of citation scores--A case study in chemical engineering。Journal of the American Society for Information Science，45，39-49。

會議論文
1.	Abbott, A.(200806)。Publication and the future of knowledge。The Association of American University Presses。Montreal：Association of American University Presses。
2.	Braben, D. W.(201110)。How to identify people who might radically change the way we think about an important subject。Danish National Research Foundation Annual Meeting。Copenhagen。
3.	Chubin, D. E.、Hackett, E. J.(200302)。Peer review for the 21st century: Applications to education research。Workshop on the Peer Review of Education Research Grant Applications。Washington, DC。
4.	Frodeman, R.、Holbrook, J.(201203)。The promise and perils of transformative research。Workshop on the Transformative research: Ethical and societal implications。Arlington, VA：National Science Foundation。
5.	Holbrook, J. B.(201310)。Peer review of team science research。Workshop on Institutional and Organizational Supports for Team Science。Washington, DC.。
6.	Lai, B.、Peña, V.(201303)。Big data in evaluating transformative scientific research: Concepts and a case study。Workshop on the Big Data: Measuring the Impact of the Government's Research and Development Investments。Washington, DC。
7.	Scarpa, T.(200905)。Assessing and advancing funding of biomedical research benchmarking: Values and practices of different countries。Sigtuna Project。Sigtuna。
8.	Tatum, C.、Wouters, P.(201311)。ACUMEN Portfolio: Resources for evaluation of individual researchers。EuroCRIS Membership Meeting。Porto, Portugal。

研究報告
1.	(2005)。Quantitative indicators for research assessment--A literature review。Canberra：Australian National University。
2.	(2010)。Peer review: A guide for researchers。

圖書
1.	Lamont, Michéle(2010)。How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
2.	Cole, Steven(1992)。Making Science: Between nature and society。Cambridge, Ma：Harvard University Press。
3.	Cole, Jonathan R.、Cole, Stephen(1973)。Social Stratification in Science。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。
4.	Borgman, Christine L.(2007)。Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the internet。MIT Press。
5.	Andersen, D. L.(2003)。Digital scholarship in the tenure, promotion, and review process。New York, NY：M. E. Sharpe。
6.	Braben, D. W.(2004)。Pioneering research: A risk worth taking。Hoboken, NJ：Wiley。
7.	Brown, T.(2004)。Peer review and the acceptance of new scientific ideas。London, England：Sense about Science。
8.	Chubin, D. E.、Hackett, E. J.(1990)。Peerless science: Peer review and U.S. science policy。New York, NY：State University of New York Press。
9.	Dearing, R.(1997)。Higher education in the learning society。Leeds, England：National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education。
10.	England, J. M.(1982)。A patron for pure science: The National Science Foundation's formative years, 1945-57。Washington, DC：National Science Foundation。
11.	Geisler, E.(2000)。The metrics of science and technology。Westport, CT：Quorum Books。
12.	General Accounting Office(1999)。Federal research: Peer review practices at federal science agencies vary。Washington, DC：United States General Accounting Office。
13.	Gluckman, P.(2012)。Which science to fund: Time to review peer review?。Auckland：Office of the Prime Minister's Science Advisory Committee。
14.	Guthrie, S.、Guérin, B.、Wu, H.、Ismail, S.、Wooding, S.(2013)。Alternatives to peer review in research project funding。Santa Monica, CA：Rand Corporation。
15.	Harley, D.、Acord, S. K.(2011)。Peer review in academic promotion and publishing: Its meaning, locus, and future。Berkeley, CA：Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley。
16.	Harley, D.、Acord, S. K.、Earl-Novell, S.、Lawrence, S.、King, C. J.(2010)。Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines。Berkeley, CA：UC Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education。
17.	Hénard, Fabrice(2010)。Learning our lesson: Review of quality teaching in higher education。Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。
18.	Ismail, S.、Farrands, A.、Wooding, S.(2009)。Evaluating grant peer review in the health sciences。Cambridge, England：RAND Europe。
19.	Kostoff, R. N.(2004)。Research program peer review: Purposes, principles, practices, protocols。Arlington, VA：Office of Naval Research。
20.	Pendlebury, D. A.(2008)。Using bibliometrics in evaluating research。Philadelphia, PA：Thomson Scientific, Research Department。
21.	Popper, K.(1961)。The logic of scientific discovery。London, England：Routledge & Kegan Paul。
22.	Rymer, L.(2011)。Measuring the impact of research: The context for metric development。Canberra：Group of Eight Australia。
23.	Savage, J. D.(1999)。Funding science in America: Congress, universities, and the politics of the academic pork barrel。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。
24.	Weller, A. C.(2002)。Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses。Medford, NJ：American Society for Information Science and Technology。
25.	Whitley, R.、Gläser, J.(2007)。The changing governance of the sciences: The advent of research evaluation systems。Dordrecht：Springer。
26.	Ziman, J.(2000)。Real science: What it is and what it means。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。
27.	de Solla Price, Derek J.(1963)。Little Science, Big Science。Columbia University Press。
28.	Becher, T.、Trowler, P.(2001)。Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines。Open University Press。
29.	Lock, S.(1985)。A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine。London, England：Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust。

其他
1.	(2014)。Guidelines for good evaluation practice with the ACUMEN portfolio，http://research-acumen.eu/wp-content/upload s/D6.14-Good-Evaluat ion-Practices.pdf。
2.	(2010)。Congressional R&D earmarks by agency and program，http://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/migrate/uploads/earmloc.pdf。
3.	(1915)。AAUP's 1915 declaration of principles，http://aaup.org.uiowa.edu/files/aaup.org.uiowa.edu/files/Gen_Dec_Princ.pdf。
4.	(1940)。1940 statement of principles on academic freedom and tenure，http://www.aaup.org/file/1940%20Statement.pdf。
5.	(1966)。Statement on government of colleges and universities，http://www.aaup.org/report/statement-govemment-colleges-and-universities。
6.	Bexley, E.，James, R.，Arkoudis, S.(2011)。The Australian academic profession in transition，http://careers.unimelb.edu.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0003/723315/The_Academic_ Profession_in_Transition_Sept2011 .pdf。
7.	Boden, M.，Ash, E.，Edge, D.，Reece, C.，Skehel, J.，Williams, P.(1990)。Peer review: A report to the advisory board for the research councils from the working group on peer review，http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160217110318/http://mrc. ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index. htm?d=MRC003951。
8.	(2007)。Peer review: The challenges for the humanities and social sciences，http://www.britac.ac.uk/policy/peer-review.cfm。
9.	(2011)。ESF survey analysis report on peer review practices，http://www.esf.org/fileadmin/Public_documents/Publications/pr_guide_survey.pdf。
10.	(2011)。European peer review guide: Integrating policies and practices into coherent procedures，https://www.vr.se/downlo ad/18.2ab49299132224ae10680001647/ European+Peer+Review+Guide.pdf。
11.	(2012)。Statement of principles for scientific merit review，http://www.globalresearchcouncil.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/gs_principles-English.pdf。
12.	Harnad, S.(2000)。The invisible hand of peer review，http://cogprints.org/1646/。
13.	The Higher Education Academy(2009)。Reward and recognition in higher education: Institutional policies and their implementation，https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/rewardandrecognition_2_2.pdf。
14.	Holbrook, J. B.(2012)。Re-assessing the science--society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation's broader impacts merit review criterion (1997-2011)，http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc77119/。
15.	(2013)。Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals，http://www.scienceofsciencepolicy.net/sites/default/files/attachments/CAPR%20midterm.pdf。
16.	Laudel, G.，Glaser, J.(2012)。The ERC's impact on the grantees' research and their careers，http://www.laudel.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/EURECIA-WP4-report-final-Jan2012.pdf。
17.	(2006)。Selected findings from the MLA's 2005 survey of tenure and promotion，http://apps.mla.org/pdf/taskforcereportppt.pdf。
18.	(2013)。Enhancing peer review survey results report，http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov/docs/Enhancing_Peer_ Review_Report_2012 .pdf。
19.	(2011)。National Science Foundation's merit review criteria: Review and revisions，http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2011/meritreviewcriteria.pdf。
20.	(2006)。Overview: Nature's peer review trial，http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05535.html。
21.	(2011)。Issue brief peer review，http://www.oecd.org/ innovation/policyplatform/48136766.pdf。
22.	(2011)。OECD issue brief: Research organization evaluation，http://www.oecd.org/innovation/policyplatform/48136330.pdf。
23.	(2006)。Report of the Research Councils UK efficiency and effectiveness of peer review project，http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/documents/rcukprreport.pdf。
24.	RCUK response to the project report & consultation on the efficiency and effectiveness of peer review，http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/documents/ responsereport.pdf。
25.	(2011)。E-journals: Their use, value and impact，http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/e-joumals-their-use-value-and-impact。
26.	(1995)。Peer review--An assessment of recent developments，https://royalsociety.org/-/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/1995/10260.pdf。
27.	(2010)。Peer review survey 2009: Full report，http://www.senseaboutscience.org/data/files/Peer_Review/Peer_Review_Survey_ Final_3.pdf。
28.	Ware, M.(2013)。Peer review: An introduction and guide，http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/pdf/PRC-PeerReview-Guide-2013.pdf。
29.	Ware, M.，Monkman, M.(2008)。Peer review in scholarly journals: Perspective of the scholarly community--An international study，http:// publishingresearchconsortium.com/ index.php/112-prc-projects/research-reports/peer-review-in-scholarly-journals-research-report/142-peer-review-in-scholarly-jouraals-perspective-of-the-scholarly-community-an-intemational-study。
30.	Waters, D. J.(20090302)。Archives, edition-making, and the future of scholarly communication，https://mellon.org/media/filer_ public/30/9d/309de9al-94fa-40fb-bblf-f087333e8658/djw-archives-edition-making-2009.pdf。
31.	Wilcox, T. W.(1970)。A comprehensive survey of undergraduate programs in English in the United States，http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED044422.pdf。

圖書論文
1.	Harnad, S.(1996)。Implementing Peer Review on the Net: Scientific Quality Control in Scholarly Electronic Journals。Scholarly Publication: The Electronic Frontier。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。
2.	Bornmann, L.(2011)。Peer review and bibliometric: Potentials and problem。University rankings: Theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education。Berlin：Springer。
3.	Boyer, E. L.(1997)。Scholarship--A personal journey。Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。
4.	Callaham, M.(2003)。The evaluation and training of peer reviewers。Peer review in health science。London, England：BMJ Publishing Group。
5.	Cole, J. R.(2000)。The role of journals in the growth of scientific knowledge。The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield。Medford, NJ：Information Today。
6.	Cozzens, S. E.(2001)。Autonomy and accountability for 21st century science。Science, technology, and governance。London, England：Pinter。
7.	Cummings, W. K.、Finkelstein, M. J.(2012)。Historical and comparative perspectives on the faculty role in governance。Scholars in the changing American academy。Dordrecht, Netherlands：Springer。
8.	Demicheli, V.、Di Pietrantonj, C.(2007)。Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications。Cochrane database of systematic reviews。Hoboken, NJ：Wiley。
9.	Fletcher, R. H.、Fletcher, S. W.(2003)。The effectiveness of journal peer review。Peer review in health science。London, England：BMJ Publishing Group。
10.	Frodeman, R.、Holbrook, J.、Mitcham, C.(2012)。Part I: Defining peer review。Peer review, research integrity, and the governance of science: Practice, theory, and current discussions。Beijing：People's Publishing House。
11.	Godlee, F.、Jefferson, T.(2003)。[Peer review in health sciences] Introduction。Peer review in health sciences。London, England：BMJ Publishing Group。
12.	Guston, D. H.(2003)。The expanding role of peer review processes in the United States。Learning from science and technology policy evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe。Cheltenham, England：Edward Elgar。
13.	Hackett, E. J.(1997)。Peer review in science and science policy。East-west dialogue on research evaluation in post-communist Europe。Budapest, Hungary：Central European University Press。
14.	Heitman, E.(2002)。The roots of honor and integrity in science: Historical themes in the practical ethics of research。The ethical dimensions of the biological and health sciences。Cambridge, England：Cambridge University Press。
15.	Merton, R. K.(1942)。The normative structure of science。The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。
16.	Odlyzko, A. M.(1996)。Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals。Scholarly publishing: The electronic frontier。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。
17.	Rennie, D.(2003)。Editorial peer review: Its development and rationale。Peer review in health sciences。London, England：BMJ Publishing Group。
18.	Shadbolt, N.、Brody, T.、Carr, L.、Harnad, S.(2006)。The open research web: A preview of the optimal and the inevitable。Open access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects。Oxford, England：Chandos。
19.	Smith, R.(2003)。The future of peer review。Peer review in health science。London, England：BMJ Publishing Group。
20.	Van Arensbergen, P.、van der Weijden, I.、van den Besselaar, P.(2014)。Academic talent selection in grant review panels。(Re)searching scientific careers。St. Petersburg, Russia：IHST：RAS-Nestor-Historia-SSTNET：ESA。
21.	Wood, F. Q.、Wessely, S.(2003)。Peer review of grant applications: A systematic review。Peer review in health sciences。London, England：BMJ Publishing Group。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	預印本之特性、出版倫理與其在COVID-19肺炎疫情下的知識傳播影響力
2.	教育學門國際期刊評比之研究

1.	同儕審查的評審標準、信度與公平性研究：以台灣出版之社會暨人文科學期刊為例

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	從文獻保證原理的角度探討中國古代圖書分類法
2.	Users' Perceived Difficulties and Corresponding Reformulation Strategies in Google Voice Search
3.	Cognitive Styles, Demographic Attributes, Task Performance, and Affective Experiences: An Empirical Investigation into Astrophysics Data System (ADS) Core Users
4.	Information Challenges, Challenging Information Digital Workplaces
5.	Digital Workplaces and Information Access: Some Research Perspectives from the French Context
6.	Developing a Model of Factors Influencing Professional Workers’ Information Behaviors
7.	Professionals’ Understanding of the Influence of Legal and Regulatory Requirements and International Standards on Workplace Information Behavior
8.	Reframing the Research of Information Work with Information Leadership and Situational Appropriation of Information
9.	The Interplay between Generations and Individual Differences in Information Sharing at the Workplace
10.	Contextual Design Methods for Information Interaction in the Workplace
11.	Interactive Information Retrieval in the Work Context: the Challenge of Evaluation
12.	Analysis of Interactive Search Tasks: Relevance Perception, Influence Factors and Variance of User Experience
13.	A Darker Side of Human Information Behavior in the Workplace: a Call for Research on Workplace Bullying Information Behavior
14.	Workplace Learning and Information Practices of Newly Qualified Nurses in a Hospital
15.	Information Access and Workplace Learning in “Peopleless Offices” by “Officeless People” Proposed Research Platform for Digital Workplace Development

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫