:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以專利引證探討全球自行車產業技術知識流動
書刊名:休閒研究
作者:蘇信寧 引用關係康晴雯林佳韻陸綵格李卓恆
作者(外文):Su, Hsin-ningKang, Ching-wenLin, Jia-yunLu, Tsai-geLee, Michael
出版日期:2016
卷期:6:2
頁次:頁44-62
主題關鍵詞:自行車專利知識流動引證分析社會網路BicyclePatentKnowledge flowCitation analysisSocial network
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:7
近年因綠色意識逐漸提高,使自行車產業之發展更趨成熟,且在全球知識 經濟逐漸擴展的過程中,專利扮演產業發展過程中的重要角色。本研究以社會 網絡概念出發,透過社會網絡分析得自行車產業專利之技術流動概況,藉由專 利間相互引證之關係,建構自行車專利引證網絡,了解自行車產業技術演化概 況,進而得知其知識流動情形與預測該發展脈絡。本研究資料來源為美國專利 商標局 (USPTO) 之資料庫,從1976至2010年間之自行車專利共5526筆。透過此些專利,藉由自行車產業專利特徵以分析自行車之專利,有助了解自行車產 業發展情形及企業之創新能力,並可提升自行車產業之運作效能,預測未來專 利技術發展的可能方向,藉由專利技術建立防禦堡壘,提昇企業自我競爭優勢。 本研究對於自行車產業專利技術知識、產業動態以及網絡分析、與專利引證網 絡地圖等具有學術研究價值。藉由結合專利分析與網絡理論,以探討專利知識 流動之影響力,發現專利數量及知識流動頻率,隨時間推演逐漸提升,主要集中在特定領域。對於未來發展方向之可行性,建議了解並發展核心專利,對於 市場發展及專利戰爭中,有極大競爭優勢。
In recent years, the development of bicycle industry has become more and more mature. Patent as a type of intellectual property plays an important role in the development of a knowledge economy. This research utilizes the concept of Social Network Analysis to understand technology flow in the bicycle industry depicted by patented technologies. By constructing and analyzing patents' citation network, the technological structure in the bicycle industry can be obtained and therefore knowledge flow as well as technology development context can be forecasted. This study downloads all bicycle patents from 1976-2010 (a total of 5526 patents) from USPTO database and analyzes characteristic attributes of every patent to understand featuring patent characteristics as a function of time, as well as to understand the development of the bicycle industry and its innovation capability. The obtained results are able to help improve the development strategy of the bicycle Industry and advance patent strategy for the development of a more advanced green environment in a sustainable economy. Furthermore, by combing theories and analyses from patented technologies, industrial trends, patent citation network analyses…etc. The impact of knowledge flow is realized and discussed. It is found that it is important to develop patents in the core technology fields within the bicycle industry as it provides the competitive edge necessary for market expansions as well as in patent litigation lawsuits.
期刊論文
1.Chien, H. C.、Tseng, C. H.(2004)。An automatic transmission for bicycles: a simulation。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,33(2),123-132。  new window
2.Chang, C. C. A.、Chen, W. L.(2009)。A Case Study of Travel Motivation, Expectation and Satisfaction of Ho-fon Bikeway Visitors。Asian Journal of Management and Humanity Sciences,4(1),28-49。  new window
3.Borgatti, S. P.、Everett, M. G.(2006)。A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality。Social Networks,28(4),466-484。  new window
4.Borgatti, S. P.(2005)。Centrality and network flow。Social networks,27(1),55-71。  new window
5.McPherson, Miller、Smith-Lovin, Lynn、Cook, James M.(2001)。Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks。Annual Review of Sociology,27(1),415-444。  new window
6.Dosi, G.(1982)。Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change。Research Policy,11(3),147-162。  new window
7.張維娟(19980500)。臺灣自行車工業之現況與展望。中國商銀月刊,17(5),24-38。  延伸查詢new window
8.張維娟(19980600)。臺灣自行車工業之現況與展望。中國商銀月刊,17(6),44-61。  延伸查詢new window
9.戴貞德、江維晉(20110900)。品質機能展開於創新設計之研究--以公路自行車為例。商業現代化學刊,6(2),133-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Allison, J. R.、Lemley, M. A.、Moore, K. A.、Trunkey, R. D.(2003)。Valuable patents。Georgetown Law Journal,92(3),435-479。  new window
11.Burke, P. F.、Reitzig, M.(2007)。Measuring patent assessment quality-analyzing the degree and kind of (in) consistency in patent offices'decision making。Research Policy,36(9),1404-1430。  new window
12.Cook, J. P.(2007)。On understanding the increase in us patent litigation。American Law and Economics Review,9(1),48-71。  new window
13.Ernst, H.、Omland, N.(2011)。The Patent Asset Index - A new approach to benchmark patent portfolios。World Patent Information,33(1),34-41。  new window
14.Grupp, H.、Schmoch, U.(1999)。Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation。Research Policy,28(4),377-396。  new window
15.Jaffe, Adam B.(2000)。The U.S. patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process。Research Policy,29(4/5),531-557。  new window
16.Karvonen, M.、Kässi, T.(2012)。Patent citations as a tool for analysing the early stages of convergence。Technological Forecasting and Social Change,80(6),1094-1107。  new window
17.Opsahl, Tore、Agneessens, Filip、Skvoretz, John(2010)。Node Centrality in Weighted Networks: Generalizing Degree and Shortest Paths。Social Networks,32(3),245-251。  new window
18.Yoon, B.、Park, Y.(2004)。A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for hightechnology trend。The Journal of High Technology Management Research,15(1),37-50。  new window
19.Bonacich, P.(1987)。Power and centrality: A family of measures。American Journal of Sociology,92(5),1170-1182。  new window
20.Chen, Y. S.、Lin, James M. J.、Chang, C. H.、Liu, F.-M.(2009)。Technological innovations and industry clustering in the bicycle industry in Taiwan。Technology in Society,31(3),207-217。  new window
21.Hu, A. G. Z.、Jaffe, A. B.(2003)。Patent citations and international knowledge flow: The cases of Korea and Taiwan。International Journal of Industrial Organization,21(6),849-880。  new window
22.Lai, K.-K.、Wu, S.-J.(2005)。Using the Patent Co-citation Approach to Establish a New Patent Classification System。Information Processing and Management,41(2),313-330。  new window
23.Meyer, Martin(2000)。Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature。Research Policy,29(3),409-434。  new window
24.Narin, F.(1995)。Patents as Indicators for the Evaluation of Industrial Research Output。Scientometrics,34(3),489-496。  new window
25.Reitzig, M.(2004)。Improving patent valuations for management purposes: validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales。Research Policy,33(6/7),939-957。  new window
26.Stuart, T. E.、Podolny, J. M.(1996)。Local Search and the Evolution of Technological Capabilities。Strategic Management Journal,17(S1),21-38。  new window
27.Fung, M. K.、Chow, W. W.(2002)。Measuring The Intensity of Knowledge Flow With Patent Statistics。Economics Letters,74(3),353-358。  new window
28.Krackhardt, David、Hanson, Jeffrey R.(1993)。Informal Networks: The Company Behind the Chart。Harvard Business Review,71(4),104-111。  new window
29.Jaffe, Adam B.、Trajtenberg, Manuel、Henderson, Rebecca(1993)。Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations。Quarterly Journal of Economics,108(3),577-598。  new window
30.Granovetter, Mark S.(1973)。The Strength of Weak Ties。American Journal of Sociology,78(6),1360-1380。  new window
31.Freeman, Linton C.(1978)。Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification。Social Networks,1(3),215-239。  new window
會議論文
1.莊桓綺、林晉寬(2011)。探討捷安特公司之動態研發能力:專利分析法。全球商業經營管理研討會,496-507。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Jaffe, A.、Trajtenberg, M.(1998)。International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations。National Bureau of Economic Research。  new window
2.Cohen, W. M.、Nelson, R. R.、Walsh, J. P.(2000)。Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not)。National Bureau of Economic Research。  new window
3.Griliches, Z.(1991)。Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey。National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.。  new window
圖書
1.Hacklin, F.、Springer Link(2008)。Management of convergence in innovation strategies and capabilities for value creation beyond blurring industry boundaries。  new window
2.Kuhn, T. S.(1962)。The structure of scientific revolutions。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brass, Daniel J.、Burkhardt, Marlene E.(1992)。Centrality and Power in Organizations。Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action。Harvard Business School Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top