:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:A Study of Issue Preclusion of the U.S. Patent System Based on Foreign Patent Arbitration
書刊名:銘傳大學法學論叢
作者:謝祖松 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh, Tsu-sung
出版日期:2015
卷期:24
頁次:頁1-30
主題關鍵詞:排除效既判力爭點效專利仲裁Issue preclusionRes judicataPatentArbitrationOmpetenz-kompetenz
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:7
期刊論文
1.Bradley, J. P.、Kubasta, K. J.(2002)。Issue Preclusion as Applied to Claim Interpretation。Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal,10,323-348。  new window
2.McGarrigle, P. L.(1998)。The Role of Foreign Judgments in Patent Litigation: A Perspective and Strategic Overview。Journal of Law and Technology,39,107-142。  new window
3.Muraff, J. P.(1993)。Issue Preclusion--Recognizing Foreign Judgments in United States Patent Infringement Suits: A New Approach。The John Marshall Law Review,26(3),627-713。  new window
4.Gordon, Randy D.(2006)。Only one kick at the cat: a contextual rubric for evaluating res judicata and collateral estoppel in international commercial arbitration。Fla. J. Int'l L.,18,549。  new window
5.Biren, Melissa Hope(1981)。Res Judicata/Collateral Estoppel Effect of a Court Determination in Subsequent Arbitration。Alb. L. Rev.,45,1029。  new window
6.Carmichael, Paul D.(1983)。The Arbitration of Patent Disputes。Arb. J.,38,1。  new window
7.謝祖松(20160300)。Preclusion Based on Foreign Patent Judgment and Prosecution History: A Comparative Study to U.S. Patent System。National Taiwan University Law Review,11(1),81-127。new window  new window
8.Hulbert, Richard W.(1989)。Arbitral Procedures and the Preclusive Effect of Awards in International Commercial Arbitration。Int'l Tax & Bus. Law,7,156。  new window
9.Motomura, Hiroshi(1988)。Arbitration and Collateral Estoppel: Using Preclusion to Shape Procedural Choices。Tul. L. Rev.,63,29。  new window
10.Martin, Julia A.(1997)。Arbitrating in the Alps Rather Than Litigating in Los Angeles: The Advantages of International Intellectual Property-Specific Alternative Dispute Resolution。Stan. L. Rev.,49(4),917-970。  new window
11.Shell, G. Richard(1988)。Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel Effects of Commercial Arbitration。UCLA L. Rev.,35,623。  new window
12.Sudol, Sabrina M.(2004)。NOTE: The U.N. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and Issue Preclusion: A Traditional Collateral Estoppel Determination。U. Pitt. L. Rev.,65,931。  new window
13.Wong, Jarrod(2005)。Court or ArbitratorWho Decides Whether Res Judicata Bars Subsequent Arbitration Under The Federal Arbitration Act?。Santa Clara L. Rev.,46,49。  new window
14.Zeynalova, Yuliya(2013)。The Law on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Is It Broken and How Do We Fix It?。Berkeley J. Int'l L.,31,150。  new window
學位論文
1.Li, Tzu Yin(2008)。A Study of the Arbitrability to Patent-Related Cases at 89, 99(碩士論文)。National Cheng ChiUniversity。  new window
圖書
1.Moore, James William、Lucas, Jo Desha(1993)。Moore's Federal Practice。  new window
2.Yeazell, Stephen C.(1992)。Civil Procedure。  new window
圖書論文
1.Asensio, P. A. De M.(2010)。Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Intellectual Property Litigation: The CLIP. Principles。Intellectual Property in the Global Area-Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, and the Recognition of Judgments in Europe, Japan and the US。Tubingen, Germany:Mohr Siebeck。  new window
2.Hsie, Ming Yang(1998)。A Discussion of the Arbitrability to Disputes of Intellectual Property Right。Collected Articles of Commercial Arbitration。The Republic of China Commercial Arbitration Association。  new window
3.Tsa, Kun-Cai(1998)。The Application of U.S. Patent Arbitration-Also Discussing the Arbitrability of R.O.C.。Collected Articles of Commercial Arbitration。The Republic of China Commercial Arbitration Association。  new window
4.Tsa, Ming Chen(1998)。A Discussion of the Scope of Arbitrability to Disputes of Intellectual Property Right of Information in R.O.C.。Collected Articles of Commercial Arbitration。The Republic of China Commercial Arbitration Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top