期刊論文1. | Foley, Kathryn M.(2009)。Note: Protecting Fictional Characters: Defining the Elusive Trademark-Copyright Divide。CONN. L. REV.,41,921-926。 |
2. | 李治安(20130100)。故事角色的第二人生:論著作權法對故事角色之保護。智慧財產權月刊,169,104-127。 延伸查詢 |
3. | 林利芝(20160100)。永遠的名偵探夏洛克.福爾摩斯--自Leslie S. Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate案探討故事角色著作權保護爭議。智慧財產權月刊,205,65-82。 延伸查詢 |
4. | Bunker, Matthew D.、Calvert, Clay(2016)。Copyright in Inanimate Characters: The Disturbing Proliferation of Microworks and the Negative Effects on Copyright and Free Expression。Communication Law and Policy,21(3),281-300。 |
5. | Nickles, Christine(1999)。The Conflicts Between Intellectual Property Protections When a Character Enters the Public Domain。UCLA Entertainment Law Review,7(1),133-168。 |
6. | Dean, Drew S.(2016)。Hitting Reset: Devising A New Video Game Copyright Regime。University of Pennsylvania Law Review,164,1239-1280。 |
7. | Hart, Terry(2016)。License to Remix。George Mason Law Review,23(4),837-899。 |
8. | Hickey, Kevin J.(2016)。Reframing Similarity Analysis in Copyright。Washington University Law Review,93(3),681-731。 |
9. | Kurtz, Leslie A.(2013)。Fictional Characters and Real People。University of Louisville Law Review,51,435-471。 |
10. | Lunsford, Christopher(2013)。Drawing a Line Between Idea and Expression in Videogame Copyright: The Evolution of Substantial Similarity for Videogame Clones。Intell. Prop. L. Bull.,18,87+96-99。 |
11. | Said, Zahr K.(2013)。Fixing Copyright in Characters: Literary Perspectives on a Legal Problem。Cardozo Law Review,35,769-829。 |
12. | Saval, Joshua(2014)。Copyrights, Trademarks, and Terminations: How Limiting Comic Book Characters in the Film Industry Reflects on Future Intellectual Property Issues for Character Law。FIU L. Rev.,9(2),405-449。 |
13. | Schubert, Heather(2015)。It's Elementary: Why We Need a New Copyright Standard, with Statutory Guidance, for Characters in a Series。Rutgers Journal of Law & Public Policy,12(2),216-251。 |
14. | Skoller, Jenna(2015)。Sherlock Holmes and Newt Scamander: Incorporating Protected Nonlinear Character Delineation into Derivative Works。Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts,38(4),577-600。 |