:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:伸張人權或司法政變--Obergefell v. Hodges案的論辯
書刊名:法令月刊
作者:賴英照 引用關係
出版日期:2017
卷期:68:5
頁次:頁1-22
主題關鍵詞:同性婚姻原意主義成長憲法正當法律程序解釋方法與價值判斷
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:13
期刊論文
1.Widiss, Deborah A.(2014)。Leveling Up After DOMA。Indiana Law Journal,89(1),43-65。  new window
2.Barnett, Randy E.(2013)。The gravitational force of originalism。Fordham Law Review,82(2),411-432。  new window
3.Beye, Amberly N.(2016)。The more, the marryer? The future of polygamous marriage in the wake of Obergefell v. Hodges。Seton Hall Law Review,47(1),197-224。  new window
4.Colby, Thomas B.(2013)。Originalism and the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment。Northwestern University Law Review,107(4),1627-1688。  new window
5.Cole, David(1986)。Agon at Agora: Creative misreadings in the First Amendment tradition。The Yale Law Journal,95(5),857-905。  new window
6.Cox, Barbara J.(2015)。From one town's "alternative families" ordinance to marriage equality nationwide。California Western Law Review,52(1),65-78。  new window
7.Eskridge, William N. Jr.(2015)。The marriage equality cases and constitutional theory。Cato Supreme Court Review,2014/2015,111-138。  new window
8.Feldman, Stephen M.(2015)。(Same) sex, lies, and democracy: Tradition, religion, and substantive due process (with an emphasis on Obergefell v. Hodges)。William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal,24(2),341-368。  new window
9.Gerken, Heather K.(2015)。Windsor's mad genius: The interlocking gears of rights and structure。Boston University Law Review,95(2),587-613。  new window
10.Goldberg, Suzanne B.(2015)。Obergefell at the intersection of civil rights and social movements。California Law Review Circuit,6,157-165。  new window
11.Hermann, Donald H. J.(2016)。Extending the fundamental right of marriage to same-sex couples: The United States Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges。Indiana Law Review,49(2),367-396。  new window
12.Huntington, Clare(2015)。Obergefell's conservatism: Reifying familial fronts。Fordham Law Review,84(1),23-31。  new window
13.Landau, Joseph(2015)。Roberts, Kennedy, and the subtle differences that matter in Obergefell。Fordham Law Review,84(1),33-40。  new window
14.McClain, Linda C.(2016)。Reading DeBoer and Obergefell through the "moral readings versus originalism" debate: From constitutional "empty cupboards" to evolving understandings。Constitutional Commentary,31(3),441-477。  new window
15.Murray, Melissa(2016)。Obergefell v. Hodges and nonmarriage inequality。California Law Review,104(5),1207-1259。  new window
16.Nicolas, Peter(2015)。Obergefell's squandered potential。California Law Review Circuit,6,137-144。  new window
17.Posner, Richard A.(2015)。Eighteen years on: A re-review (reviewing William N. Eskridge, Jr., the case for samesex marriage: From sexual liberty to civilized commitment (1996))。The Yale Law Journal,125(2),533-542。  new window
18.Powell, Catherine(2015)。Up from marriage: Freedom, solitude, and individual autonomy in the shadow of marriage equality。Fordham Law Review,84(1),69-78。  new window
19.Schacter, Jane S.(2016)。Obergefell's audiences。Ohio State Law Journal,77(5),1011-1037。  new window
20.Seidman, Louis Michael(2015)。The triumph of gay marriage and the failure of constitutional law。The Supreme Court Review,2015,115-146。  new window
21.Smith, Peter J.(2004)。Sources of federalism: An empirical analysis of the court's quest for original meaning。University of California Los Angeles Law Review,52(1),217-288。  new window
22.Sobel, Stacey L.(2015)。When Windsor isn't enough: Why the court must clarify equal protection analysis for sexual orientation classifications。Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy,24(3),493-531。  new window
23.Stevens, John Paul(2016)。Two thoughts about Obergefell v. Hodges。Ohio State Law Journal,77(5),913-917。  new window
24.Thayer, James Bradley(1893)。The origin and scope of the American doctrine of constitutional law。Harvard Law Review,7(3),129-156。  new window
25.Tribe, Laurence H.(2004)。Lawrence v. Texas: The "fundamental right" that dare not speak its name。Harvard Law Review,117(6),1893-1955。  new window
26.Tribe, Laurence H.(2015)。Equal dignity: Speaking its name。Harvard Law Review Forum,129(1),16-32。  new window
27.Yoshino, Kenji(2015)。A new birth of freedom?: Obergefell v. Hodges。Harvard Law Review,129(1),147-179。  new window
28.Yoshino, Kenji(2011)。The New Equal Protection。Harvard Law Review,124(3),747-803。  new window
圖書
1.Breyer, Stephen(2010)。Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge's View。Alfred A. Knopf。  new window
2.Cross, Frank B.(2009)。The Theory and Practice of Statutory Interpretation。Stanford University Press。  new window
3.Fleming, James E.(2015)。Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution: For Moral Readings and Against Originalisms。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Vermeule, Adrian(2006)。Judging Under Uncertainty: An Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Strauss, David A.(2010)。The Living Constitution。Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.Cobb, Michael(2015)。The Supreme Court's Lonely Hearts Club,https://nyti.ms/2mb9hW4。  new window
2.(2015)。Justice Ginsburg Addresses Alumni and Summer Institute in Wide-Ranging Conversation with Siegel,https://law.duke.edu/news/justice-ginsburgaddresses-alumni-and-summer-institute-wide-ranging-conversationsiegel/。  new window
3.US Supreme Court(2015)。Oral Arguments--Obergefell v. Hodges,http://interglacial.com/obergefell/transcript.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.Scalia, Antonin(1997)。Common-law courts in a civil-law system: The role of United States federal courts in interpreting the Constitution and laws。A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law。Princeton University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE