:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:律師費轉嫁機制於美國專利法第285條之運用--以ICON Health & Fitness v. Octane Fitness為例
書刊名:專利師
作者:蔡宗霖
出版日期:2017
卷期:29
頁次:頁29-60
主題關鍵詞:美國專利法律師費轉嫁專利權人敗訴
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:1
期刊論文
1.馮震宇(20080100)。IP戰爭新模式--投機型授權的發展與問題分析。全國律師,12(1),10-26。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝祖松(20150700)。專利周邊限定主義及中心限定主義之辯與辨--兼論折衷主義。專利師,22,81-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Schwartz, David L.、Seaman, Christopher B.(2013)。Standards of Proof in Civil Litigation: An Experiment from Patent Law。HARV. J. Law & Tec,26,429+433-434。  new window
4.Liang, Mark、Berliner, Brian(2013)。Fee Shifting in Patent Litigation。Virginia Journal of Law & Technology,18,59+67-68。  new window
5.Mayergoyz, Anna(2009)。Lessons from Europe on How to Tame U.S. Patent Trolls。CORNELL INTL L.J.,42,241-266。  new window
6.Burk, Dan L.、Lemley, A.(2009)。Fence Posts or Sign Posts? Rethinking Patent Claim Construction。U. Pa. L. Rev.,157,1743-1745。  new window
7.Meurer, Michael J.(2003)。Controlling Opportunistic and Anti-competitive Intellectual Property Litigation。B.C.L. Rev.,44,509-512。  new window
8.McCarthy, Mitchell "Mick"(20130914)。Defending Against Reckless Patent Enforcement Should Not Be an Ordinary Cost of Doing Business。The Oklahoma Journal,84(23)。  new window
9.Chen, Emily H.(2014)。Making Abusers Pay: Deterring Patent Litigation by Shifting Attorneys' Fees。Berkeley Tech. L.J.,28,351-379。  new window
10.Roth, Daniel(2013)。Patent Litigation Attorneys' Fee: Shifting from Status to Conduct。CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP.,13,257-277。  new window
11.Kieff, F. Scott(2009)。The Case for Preferring Patent-Validity Litigation over Second-Window Review and Gold-Plated Patents: When One Size Doesn't All, How Could Two Do the Trick?。U. Pa. L. Rev.,157,1937-1953。  new window
12.張哲倫、李素華(20150100)。專利民事訴訟申請專利範圍解釋之方法論--理論、主體、客體及標準。月旦法學,236,190-209。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Jones, Darin(2015)。A Shifting Landscape for Shifting Fees: Attorney-Fee Awards in Patent Suits After Octane and Highmark。Washington Law Rev.,90,505-543。  new window
學位論文
1.郭怡萱(2014)。論訴訟費用移轉變革對非專利實施實體之影響(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.江心瑜(2016)。從非專利實施實體行為對美國實務走向影響探討其權利行使之界線(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.戴維真(2015)。美國對專利怪獸之現狀與展望(碩士論文)。國立高雄第一科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.許立穎(2015)。論專利主張實體爭議與美國專利法制改革--以台灣電子業專利訴訟為核心(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡宗霖(2015)。律師費轉嫁機制於美國專利法第285條之研究(碩士論文)。銘傳大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bessen, James、Meurer, Michael J.(2008)。Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk。Princeton University Press。  new window
2.廖和信(2003)。專利就是科技競爭力。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hricik, David(2010)。Patent Ethics。  new window
4.Mueller, Janice M.(2013)。Patent Law。  new window
其他
1.Rader, Randall R.。The State of Patent Litigation,http://patentlyo.com/media/docs/2011 /09/raderstateofpatentlit.pdf。  new window
2.文道格(2014)。專利流氓找碴不再怕 美國專利訴訟現轉機。  延伸查詢new window
3.Telscher, Rudolph A.,Fussner, Kara R.。Effective Strategies for Fee Motions after Octane,http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/manintpr241&div=12&id^&page。  new window
4.Telscher, Rudy,Fussner, Kara。Patent Fee Shifting Stops Not Only Patent Trolls But Industry Bullies Too,http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2015/09/16/patent-fee-shiftingstops-not-only-patent-trolls-but-industry-bullies-too/id=61575/。  new window
5.Telscher, Rudy,Fussner, Kara。Recovering Attorney Fees in Patent Litigation Post-Octane Fitness and Highmark,http://media.straffordpub.com/products/recovering-attomey-fees-inpatent-Iitigation-post-octane-fitness-and-highmark-2014-11-04/presentation.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE