:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:對智慧財產法院成立10年專利審判實務之總體觀察及建議
書刊名:專利師
作者:張哲倫
出版日期:2017
卷期:30
頁次:頁1-33
主題關鍵詞:智慧財產法院專利審判專利侵權
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
期刊論文
1.Morre, Kimberly A.(2000)。Judges, Juries, and Patent Cases: An Empirical Peek Inside The Black Box。Michigan Law Review,99,365-409。  new window
2.Demsetz, Harold(1967)。Toward a Theory of Property Rights。The American Economic Review,57(2),374-359。  new window
3.Rader, Randall R.(2011)。The State of Patent Litigation。Federal Circuit Bar Journal,21,331+340-345。  new window
4.Lanjouw, Jean O.、Schankerman, Mark(2004)。Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms Handicapped?。J. L. & ECON.,47,45-59。  new window
5.Eisenberg, Theodore、Farber, Henry S.(1997)。The Litigious Plaintiff Hypothesis: Case Selection and Resolution。RAND J. ECON.,28,S92-S103。  new window
6.Janis, Mark D.(2004)。Reforming Patent Validity Litigation: The "Dubious Preponderance"。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,19(3),923-942。  new window
7.Linn, Hon Richard(2004)。The Future Role of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Now That It Has Turned 21。Am. U. L. Rev.,53(4),731-733。  new window
8.Landes, William M.、Posner, Richard A.(2004)。An Empirical Analysis of the Patent Court。University of Chicago Law Review,71(1),111-128。  new window
9.Allison, John R.、Lemley, Mark A.(1998)。Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents。AIPLA Quarterly Journal,26,185-277。  new window
10.Lunney, Glynn S. Jr.(2004)。Patent Law, the Federal Circuit, and the Supreme Court: A Quiet Revolution。Supreme Court Economic Review,11,1-80。  new window
11.Moore, Kimberly A.(2005)。MARKMAN EIGHT YEARS LATER: IS CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MORE PREDICTABLE?。Lewis & Clark L. Rev.,9,231-240。  new window
12.Newman, Pauline(1993)。The Federal Circuit: Judicial Stability or Judicial Activism?。Am. U. L. Rev.,42,683-687。  new window
13.黃銘傑(20120800)。智財銀行與公平交易法。全國律師,16(8),22-32。  延伸查詢new window
14.Kortum, Samuel、Lerner, Josh(1999)。What Is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?。Research Policy,28(1),1-22。  new window
會議論文
1.謝銘洋、劉孔中、李素華(2009)。智慧財產法院判決統計與分析。智慧財產案件審理總體檢研討會,台灣法學會、台北律師公會、亞洲專利代理人協會台灣總會、臺灣大學法律學院科技、倫理與法律中心 (會議日期: 2009年12月26日)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Nard, Craig Allen(2017)。The Law of Patents。  new window
2.Landes, William M.、Posner, Richard(2003)。The economic structure of intellectual property law。Harvard University press。  new window
其他
1.Min Son, Korea, New Centralized Infringement Courts(20160126)。Managing Intellectual Property,http://www.managingip.com/Article/3521767/Korea-New-centralised-infringement-courts.html。  new window
2.馮剛。中國知識產權專業審判介紹--以北京知識產權法院為例,http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?_biz=MzI30TA3MjQ3Mw==&inid=2650265577&idx=2&sn=< 16622332295a0784d9454d7ac48d57d3&scene=1&srcid=0602oM61QSWlvufTqM13HylK&from=singlemessage&isappinstalled=0#wechat_redirect。  延伸查詢new window
3.The Beijing IP court gave foreign IP plaintiffs a perfect 65-0 win rate in 2015, reports one of its judges,http://www.iam-media.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=8dc59dc8-6405-4b86-b241-27e89afc6089。  new window
4.國內首個NPE標准必要專利訴訟:WiLAN在南京起訴索尼移動,http://www.ciplawyer.hk/article.asp?articleid=20264。  延伸查詢new window
5.加拿大WiLan在華控訴索尼侵犯LTE專利權,http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Read.aspx?PostID=12940。  延伸查詢new window
6.華為維權首案宣判三星侵權成立需賠華為8,000萬元,http://tech.qq.com/aZ20170406/016138.htm。  延伸查詢new window
7.Huawei defeats Samsung in patent battle in China,http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-39515033。  new window
8.China court orders Samsung units to pay 11.6 million to Huawei over patent case,http://www.reuters.com/article/us-samsung-elec-huawei-tech-china-idUSKBN1780BP。  new window
9.Ecstasy and agony for Huawei after 11.6 million China win and landmark FRAND dispute loss in the UK,http://www.iam-media.com/blog/detail.aspx7g44e2f3e0-7287-4540-b3d3-d65b3db631c9。  new window
10.Establishment of the SICC,http://www.sicc.gov.sg/About.aspx?id=21, 。  new window
11.Registration of Foreign Lawyers before the SICC,http://www.sicc.gov.sg/ForeignLawyer.aspx?id=101。  new window
12.2015 International IP Court Conference in Korea,http://patent.scourt.go.kr/dcboard/new/EngDcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=12&gubun=546&cbub_code=&scode_kname=%C6%AF%C7%E3%BF%B5%B9%AE%20IIPCC%20PreviousConference&searchWord=¤tPage=0。  new window
圖書論文
1.沈冠伶(2010)。智慧財產民事訴訟當事人之程序利益保護。智慧財產訴訟制度相關論文彙編。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅秀培、司法院行政訴訟及懲戒廳(2010)。專利舉發與無效抗辯雙軌制課題之初探--以日本法為中心。智慧財產訴訟制度相關論文彙編。  延伸查詢new window
3.Suzuki, Masabumi、Tamura, Yoshiyuki(2012)。The Enforcement of Patent: Japan。The Enforcement OF PATENTS。  new window
4.吳從周(2017)。辯論主義第一命題之界限及法官私知之可利用性。修正辯論主義與偕同主義之時代論爭:民事程序法焦點論壇。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top