| 期刊論文1. | Morre, Kimberly A.(2000)。Judges, Juries, and Patent Cases: An Empirical Peek Inside The Black Box。Michigan Law Review,99,365-409。 | 2. | Demsetz, Harold(1967)。Toward a Theory of Property Rights。The American Economic Review,57(2),374-359。 | 3. | Rader, Randall R.(2011)。The State of Patent Litigation。Federal Circuit Bar Journal,21,331+340-345。 | 4. | Lanjouw, Jean O.、Schankerman, Mark(2004)。Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms Handicapped?。J. L. & ECON.,47,45-59。 | 5. | Eisenberg, Theodore、Farber, Henry S.(1997)。The Litigious Plaintiff Hypothesis: Case Selection and Resolution。RAND J. ECON.,28,S92-S103。 | 6. | Janis, Mark D.(2004)。Reforming Patent Validity Litigation: The "Dubious Preponderance"。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,19(3),923-942。 | 7. | Linn, Hon Richard(2004)。The Future Role of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Now That It Has Turned 21。Am. U. L. Rev.,53(4),731-733。 | 8. | Landes, William M.、Posner, Richard A.(2004)。An Empirical Analysis of the Patent Court。University of Chicago Law Review,71(1),111-128。 | 9. | Allison, John R.、Lemley, Mark A.(1998)。Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents。AIPLA Quarterly Journal,26,185-277。 | 10. | Lunney, Glynn S. Jr.(2004)。Patent Law, the Federal Circuit, and the Supreme Court: A Quiet Revolution。Supreme Court Economic Review,11,1-80。 | 11. | Moore, Kimberly A.(2005)。MARKMAN EIGHT YEARS LATER: IS CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MORE PREDICTABLE?。Lewis & Clark L. Rev.,9,231-240。 | 12. | Newman, Pauline(1993)。The Federal Circuit: Judicial Stability or Judicial Activism?。Am. U. L. Rev.,42,683-687。 | 13. | 黃銘傑(20120800)。智財銀行與公平交易法。全國律師,16(8),22-32。 延伸查詢 | 14. | Kortum, Samuel、Lerner, Josh(1999)。What Is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?。Research Policy,28(1),1-22。 | 會議論文1. | 謝銘洋、劉孔中、李素華(2009)。智慧財產法院判決統計與分析。智慧財產案件審理總體檢研討會,台灣法學會、台北律師公會、亞洲專利代理人協會台灣總會、臺灣大學法律學院科技、倫理與法律中心 (會議日期: 2009年12月26日)。 延伸查詢 | 圖書1. | Nard, Craig Allen(2017)。The Law of Patents。 | 2. | Landes, William M.、Posner, Richard(2003)。The economic structure of intellectual property law。Harvard University press。 | 其他1. | Min Son, Korea, New Centralized Infringement Courts(20160126)。Managing Intellectual Property,http://www.managingip.com/Article/3521767/Korea-New-centralised-infringement-courts.html。 | 2. | 馮剛。中國知識產權專業審判介紹--以北京知識產權法院為例,http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?_biz=MzI30TA3MjQ3Mw==&inid=2650265577&idx=2&sn=< 16622332295a0784d9454d7ac48d57d3&scene=1&srcid=0602oM61QSWlvufTqM13HylK&from=singlemessage&isappinstalled=0#wechat_redirect。 延伸查詢 | 3. | The Beijing IP court gave foreign IP plaintiffs a perfect 65-0 win rate in 2015, reports one of its judges,http://www.iam-media.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=8dc59dc8-6405-4b86-b241-27e89afc6089。 | 4. | 國內首個NPE標准必要專利訴訟:WiLAN在南京起訴索尼移動,http://www.ciplawyer.hk/article.asp?articleid=20264。 延伸查詢 | 5. | 加拿大WiLan在華控訴索尼侵犯LTE專利權,http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Read.aspx?PostID=12940。 延伸查詢 | 6. | 華為維權首案宣判三星侵權成立需賠華為8,000萬元,http://tech.qq.com/aZ20170406/016138.htm。 延伸查詢 | 7. | Huawei defeats Samsung in patent battle in China,http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-39515033。 | 8. | China court orders Samsung units to pay 11.6 million to Huawei over patent case,http://www.reuters.com/article/us-samsung-elec-huawei-tech-china-idUSKBN1780BP。 | 9. | Ecstasy and agony for Huawei after 11.6 million China win and landmark FRAND dispute loss in the UK,http://www.iam-media.com/blog/detail.aspx7g44e2f3e0-7287-4540-b3d3-d65b3db631c9。 | 10. | Establishment of the SICC,http://www.sicc.gov.sg/About.aspx?id=21, 。 | 11. | Registration of Foreign Lawyers before the SICC,http://www.sicc.gov.sg/ForeignLawyer.aspx?id=101。 | 12. | 2015 International IP Court Conference in Korea,http://patent.scourt.go.kr/dcboard/new/EngDcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=12&gubun=546&cbub_code=&scode_kname=%C6%AF%C7%E3%BF%B5%B9%AE%20IIPCC%20PreviousConference&searchWord=¤tPage=0。 | 圖書論文1. | 沈冠伶(2010)。智慧財產民事訴訟當事人之程序利益保護。智慧財產訴訟制度相關論文彙編。 延伸查詢 | 2. | 羅秀培、司法院行政訴訟及懲戒廳(2010)。專利舉發與無效抗辯雙軌制課題之初探--以日本法為中心。智慧財產訴訟制度相關論文彙編。 延伸查詢 | 3. | Suzuki, Masabumi、Tamura, Yoshiyuki(2012)。The Enforcement of Patent: Japan。The Enforcement OF PATENTS。 | 4. | 吳從周(2017)。辯論主義第一命題之界限及法官私知之可利用性。修正辯論主義與偕同主義之時代論爭:民事程序法焦點論壇。 延伸查詢 | |