乳癌及大腸癌篩檢不平等評估--反轉公平假說之檢視__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	乳癌及大腸癌篩檢不平等評估--反轉公平假說之檢視
書刊名：	臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者：	李佳綺／李妙純
作者(外文)：	Lee, Bonnie Chiachi／Lee, Miaw-chwen
出版日期：	2018
卷期：	37:1
頁次：	頁50-62
主題關鍵詞：	癌症篩檢；Erreygers校正集中指數；相對不平等指數；反轉公平假說；Cancer screening；Erreygers corrected concentration index；Relative inequality index；Inverse equity hypothesis
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:1 點閱:2

目標：本研究探討乳癌及大腸癌篩檢利用之收入不平等，以及不平等與篩檢率之關係。方法：本研究資料取自2001、2005、2009、2013年國民健康訪問調查，估計45或50歲至69歲乳癌及大腸癌篩檢之與均等家戶收入關連之Erreygers集中指數（ECI）、相對不平等指數（RII）及影響不平等因素解析。結果：乳房攝影及糞便潛血篩檢率自2001年之9.2%及10.1%分別上升至2013年之46.1%及41.3%；並呈現收入愈高篩檢率愈高的現象。2001年最高收入群體之乳房攝影使用率比最低收入群體多達近一倍（RII=0.984），但到2013年下降為多5.7%（RII=0.057）。最高收入群體之糞便潛血檢查率比最低收入群體多40-60%（RII=0.377~0.634）。除了2013年乳房攝影外，兩項篩檢之使用亦都集中於高收入群體（乳房攝影ECI=0.060~0.150；糞便潛血檢查ECI=0.036~0.104）。免費政策實施前（2001、2005及2009年）收入都是影響篩檢不平等的重要因素，但免費政策實施後（2013年）教育程度為最重要因素。結論：與「反轉公平假說」一致，當篩檢率上升時，不同收入群體篩檢率差異愈小。提升篩檢率可縮減篩檢之社會不平等，有助於緩和健康不平等。

以文找文

Objectives: This study analyzed income-related inequalities in breast and colorectal cancer screening in Taiwan and the relationship between inequality and screening rate. Methods: We used data from the 2001, 2005, 2009, and 2013 National Health Interview Surveys. The Erreygers concentration indices (ECI) and relative inequality indices (RII) were calculated and ECIs were decomposed. Results: In 2001, 9.2% of participants reported undergoing mammography and 10.1% reported having a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within the previous year. Those screening rates within the previous two years increased by 46.1% and 41.3% respectively in 2013 and showed income gradients. In 2001, mammography use by the highest-income group was nearly double that of the lowest-income group (RII=0.984), while that difference in 2013 fell by 5.7% (RII=0.057). Compared with the lowest-income group, the highest income group received 40- 60% more screening for FOBT (RII=0.377 to 0.634). Except for mammography in 2013, both mammography and FOBT were concentrated in the higher income group (ECI=0.06-0.15 for mammography; ECI=0.036-0.104 for FOBT). Before the national cancer screening programs in 2001, 2005 and 2009, income was the most important contributor to inequalities in the screening rate, while education accounted for the greatest contribution in 2013. Conclusions: Consistent with the ＂inverse equity hypothesis,＂ income-related inequalities in cancer screening decreased with higher screening rates. Therefore, an increased screening rate facilitates the reduction in inequality in cancer screening and addresses health inequalities.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Lee, M. C.、Jones, A. M.(2007)。Understanding differences in income-related health inequality between geographic regions in Taiwan using the SF-36。Health Policy，83，186-195。
2.	Link, Bruce G.、Phelan, Jo C.(1995)。Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Disease。Health and Social Behavior，Extra Issue，80-94。
3.	Chen, T. H.、Yen, A. M.、Fann, J. C.(2017)。Clarifying the debate on population-based screening for breast cancer with mammography: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials on mammography with Bayesian meta-analysis and causal model。Medicine，96，e5684。
4.	Kalager, M.、Zelen, M.、Langmark, F.、Adami, H. O.(2010)。Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway。New Engl J Med，363，1203-1210。
5.	Chiu, H. M.、Chen, S. L.、Yen, A. M.、Chiu, S. Y.、Fann, J. C.、Lee, Y. C.(2015)。Effectiveness of fecal immunochemical testing in reducing colorectal cancer mortality from the One Million Taiwanese Screening Program。Cancer，121，3221-3229。
6.	Johns, L. E.、Coleman, D. A.、Swerdlow, A. J.、Moss, S. M.(2017)。Effect of population breast screening on breast cancer mortality up to 2005 in England and Wales: an individual-level cohort study。Br J Cancer，116，246-252。
7.	Halpern, M. T.、Ward, E. M.、Pavluck, A. L.、Schrag, N. M.、Bian, J.、Chen, A. Y.(2008)。Association of insurance status and ethnicity with cancer stage at diagnosis for 12 cancer sites: a retrospective analysis。Lancet Oncol，9，222-231。
8.	Kim, S.、Hwang, J.(2016)。Assessment of trends in socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening services in Korea, 1998-2012。Int J Equity Health，15，30。
9.	Deandrea, S.、Molina-Barceló, A.、Uluturk, A.(2016)。Presence, characteristics and equity of access to breast cancer screening programmes in 27 European countries in 2010 and 2014. Results from an international survey。Prev Med，91，250-263。
10.	賴金英、賴金梅、陳秋媛、辜美安(20120400)。臺灣中老年女性未接受乳房攝影篩檢之因子。護理雜誌，59(2)，61-71。延伸查詢
11.	Menvielle, G.、Richard, J. B.、Ringa, V.、Dray-Spira, R.、Beck, F.(2014)。To what extent is women's economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010。Cancer Causes Control，25，977-983。
12.	Buron, A.、Auge, J. M.、Sala, M.(2017)。Association between socioeconomic deprivation and colorectal cancer screening outcomes: low uptake rates among the most and least deprived people。PLoS One，12，e0179864。
13.	Kim, S.、Kwon, S.、Subramanian, S. V.(2015)。Has the National Cancer Screening Program reduced income inequalities in screening attendance in South Korea?。Cancer Causes Control，26，1617-1625。
14.	Palencia, L.、Espelt, A.、Rodriguez-Sanz, M.(2010)。Socioeconomic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program。Int J Epidemiol，39，757-765。
15.	Ward, P. R.、Javanparast, S.、Ah Matt, M.(2011)。Equity of colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of National Bowel Cancer Screening Program data for South Australia。Aust N Z J Public Health，35，61-65。
16.	Peipins, L. A.、Soman, A.、Berkowitz, Z.、White, M. C.(2012)。The lack of paid sick leave as a barrier to cancer screening and medical care-seeking: results from the National Health Interview Survey。BMC Public Health，12，520。
17.	von Wagner, C.、Good, A.、Whitaker, K. L.、Wardle, J.(2011)。Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: a conceptual framework。Epidemiol Rev，33，135-147。
18.	Damiani, G.、Basso, D.、Acampora, A.(2015)。The impact of level of education on adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis。Prev Med，81，281-289。
19.	Vallet, F.、Guillaume, E.、Dejardin, O.(2016)。Influence of a screening navigation program on social inequalities in health beliefs about colorectal cancer screening。J Health Psychol，21，1700-1710。
20.	Wardle, J.、McCaffery, K.、Nadel, M.、Atkin, W.(2004)。Socioeconomic differences in cancer screening participation: comparing cognitive and psychosocial explanations。Soc Sci Med，59，249-261。
21.	Peretti-Watel, P.、Fressard, L.、Bocquier, A.、Verger, P.(2016)。Perceptions of cancer risk factors and socioeconomic status. A French study。Prev Med Rep，3，171-176。
22.	Orbell S.、Szczepura, A.、Weller, D.、Gumber, A.、Hagger, M. S.(2017)。South Asian ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and psychological mediators of faecal occult blood colorectal screening participation: a prospective test of a process model。Health Psychol，36，1161-1172。
23.	Victora, C. G.、Vaughan, J. D.、Barros, F. C.、Silva, A. C.、Tomasi, E.(2000)。Explaining trends in inequality: evidence from Brazil child health studies。Lancet，356，1093-1098。
24.	Lee, J. T.、Huang, Z.、Basu, S.、Millett, C.(2015)。The inverse equity hypothesis: does it apply to coverage of cancer screening in middle-income countries?。J Epidemiol Community Health，69，149-155。
25.	Aurélio, Peres M.、Simara, Fernandes L.、Glazer, Peres K.(2004)。Inequality of water fluoridation in Southern Brazil -- the inverse equity hypothesis revisited。Soc Sci Med，58，1181-1189。
26.	Hargreaves, J. R.、Davey, C.、White, R. G.(2013)。Does the 'inverse equity hypothesis' explain how both poverty and wealth can be associated with HIV prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa?。J Epidemiol Community Health，67，526-529。
27.	Devaux, M.(2015)。Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries。Eur J Health Econ，16，21-33。
28.	Lowrie, R.、Mcconnachie, A.、Williamson, A. E.(2017)。Incentivised chronic disease management and the inverse equity hypothesis: findings from a longitudinal analysis of Scottish primary care practice-level data。BMC Med，15，77。
29.	Ridde, V.、Agier, I.、Jahn, A.(2015)。The impact of user fee removal policies on household out-of-pocket spending: evidence against the inverse equity hypothesis from a population based study in Burkina Faso。Eur J Health Econ，16，55-64。
30.	Yang, S.、Platt, R. W.、Dahhou, M.、Kramer, M. S.(2014)。Do population-based interventions widen or narrow socioeconomic inequalities? The case of breastfeeding promotion。Int J Epidemiol，43，1284-1292。
31.	Chiou, S. T.、Wu, C. Y.、Hurng, B. S.、Lu, T. H.(2014)。Changes in the magnitude of social inequality in the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Taiwan, a country implementing a population-based organized screening program。Int J Equity Health，13，4。
32.	Erreygers, G.(2009)。Correcting the concentration index。J Health Econ，28，504-515。
33.	Erreygers, G.、Van Ourti, T.(2011)。Measuring socioeconomic inequality in health, health care and health financing by means of rank-dependent indices: a recipe for good practice。Journal of Health Economics，30，685-694。
34.	Moreno-Betancur, M.、Latouche, A.、Menvielle, G.、Kunst, A. E.、Rey, G.(2015)。Relative index of inequality and slope index of inequality: a structured regression framework for estimation。Epidemiology，26，518-527。
35.	O'Donnell O.、O'Neill S.、Van Ourti, T.、Walsh, B.(2016)。conindex: estimation of concentration indices。Stata J，16，112-138。
36.	Costa-Font, J.、Hernández-Quevedo, C.、Jiménez-Rubio, D.(2014)。Income inequalities in unhealthy life styles in England and Spain。Econ Hum Biol，13，66-75。
37.	Bíró, A.(2013)。Discount rates and the education gradient in mammography in the UK。Health Econ，22，1021-1036。
38.	Chou, C. K.、Chen, S. L.、Yen, A. M.(2016)。Outreach and inreach organized service screening programs for colorectal cancer。PLoS One，11。
39.	Solmi, F.、Von Wagner, C.、Kobayashi, L. C.、Raine, R.、Wardle, J.、Morris, S.(2015)。Decomposing socio-economic inequality in colorectal cancer screening uptake in England。Soc Sci Med，134，76-86。
40.	Walsh, B.、Silles, M.、O'Neill, C.(2012)。The role of private medical insurance in socio-economic inequalities in cancer screening uptake in Ireland。Health Econ，21，1250-1256。
41.	Carrieri, V.、Wuebker, A.(2013)。Assessing inequalities in preventive care use in Europe。Health Policy，113，247-257。
42.	Hahm M. I.、Park, E. C.、Choi, K. S.、Lee, H. Y.、Park, J. H.、Park, S. I.(2011)。Inequalities in adoption of cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective: identification of late adopters。Cancer Epidemiol，35，90-96。
43.	Cullerton, K.、Gallegos, D.、Ashley, E.(2016)。Cancer screening education: can it change knowledge and attitudes among culturally and linguistically diverse communities in Queensland, Australia?。Health Promot J Austr，27，140-147。
44.	Liss, D. T.、Baker, D. W.(2014)。Understanding current racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening in the United States。Am J Prev Med，46，228-236。
45.	Guillaume, E.、Launay, L.、Dejardin, O.(2017)。Could mobile mammography reduce social and geographic inequalities in breast cancer screening participation?。Prev Med，100，84-88。
46.	Ward, E.、Halpern, M.、Schrag, N.(2008)。Association of insurance with cancer care utilization and outcomes。CA Cancer J Clin，58，9-31。
47.	Martin, J.、Halm, E. A.、Tiro, J. A.(2017)。Reasons for lack of diagnostic colonoscopy after positive result on fecal immunochemical test in a safety-net health system。American Journal of Medicine，130(1)，(93)e1-(93)e7。
48.	Puliti, D.、Miccinesi, G.、Manneschi, G.(2012)。Does an organised screening programme reduce the inequalities in breast cancer survival?。Ann Oncol，23，319-323。
49.	Pacelli, B.、Carretta, E.、Spadea, T.(2014)。Does breast cancer screening level health inequalities out? A populationbased study in an Italian region。Eur J Public Health，24，280-285。
50.	Newey, Whitney K.、West, Kenneth D.(1994)。Automatic Lag Selection in Covariance Matrix Estimation。Review of Economic Studies，61(4)，631-653。

圖書
1.	衛生福利部國民健康署(2016)。2016國民健康署年報。臺北市：衛生福利部國民健康署。延伸查詢
2.	衛生福利部國民健康署(2010)。2010-2015國民健康署年報。台北：衛生福利部國民健康署。延伸查詢
3.	O'Donnell, O. A.、Wagstaff, A.(2008)。Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data: A Guide to Techniques and Their Implementation。Washington, DC：The World Bank。

其他
1.	衛生福利部國民健康署(2014)。中華民國103年度(103年1月1日至103年12月31日)菸害防制及衛生保健基金附屬單位決算分決算(非營業部分)，https://www.hpa.gov.tw/File/Attach/7112/File_7184.pdf。延伸查詢
2.	台北市衛生局。「台北市健康促進績優團體成果發表」，另類健康「互聯網+」攜手拚健康，http://tcgwww.taipei.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=243768039&ctNode=80553&mp=10904M。延伸查詢
3.	Health Promotion Board, Singapore。Healthy workplace ecosystem，https://www.hpb.gov.sg/workplace/healthy-workplace-ecosystem.2017/04/21。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	乳癌、大腸直腸癌篩檢策略成本效果分析：文獻系統回顧
2.	臺灣中老年女性未接受乳房攝影篩檢之因子

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫