:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:航空器失事緊急應變處理之風險因素探討--以復興航空GE235事件為例
書刊名:航運季刊
作者:張有恆盧竹瑄
作者(外文):Chang, Yu-hernLu, Chu-hsuan
出版日期:2017
卷期:26:3
頁次:頁101-123
主題關鍵詞:航空器失事之緊急應變決策實驗分析法分析網路程序法相關性分析AcciMapAircraft accidentEmergency responseDecision Making Trial and Evaluation LaboratoryDEMATELAnalytic Network ProcessANP
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
2014年及2015年國內發生兩起重大的空難事件,使得國內飛航安全之議題又受到國人的重視。然當空難發生時,為減少損失,緊急應變處理乃為救援之關鍵因素。另外,在安全管理系統(Safety Management System, SMS)中,「緊急應變計畫之協調」係屬於「安全政策與目標」之項目,因此本研究將詳加探討航空器失事後之緊急應變風險因素。為達系統性之考量,本研究利用AcciMap意外事件分析為架構,並佐以決策實驗室分析法(DEMATEL)與分析網路程序法(ANP)進行研究。最後,本研究發現良好之「聯合演練」、完善之「地方政府之地區災害防救計畫」與「監督機制與跨單位整合」之緊急應變能力,將有助減少應變過程中產生疏失,且為緊急應變處理之優先改善項目,可提升航空器失事之緊急應變處理效率,降低應變過程中之疏失。
According to the records of Aviation Safety Council (ASC) from 2005 to 2014 in Taiwan, the average aviation accidents rate of transportation operation category airplane was 5.18 per million departures. Many organizations may emphasize risk factors analysis of aviation safety rather than emergency response which can be either a neglected or urgency condition. Therefore, there will also be many uncertain risks in the processes and the procedure needed to be improved. The purpose of this study is to identify the risk factors grouped into five levels based on AcciMap theory. Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) methods are used respectively to analyze the causal relationship and the relative importance of these 20 risk factors via expert questionnaire surveys. Moreover, there is a case study of TransAsia GE235 accident to verify the credibility of the risk factors by using correlation analysis. The result suggests that the top three rankings for the risk factors in emergency response are "Joint training", "Disaster Prevention and Response Operation Plan from local government" and "Supervisory mechanism and cross-department integrated," which have a high implementation priority. This paper contributes to emergency response to aircraft accident by developing an AcciMap and the relationship among the risk factors, thereby helping management authorities, airports and airlines improve major operational and managerial weaknesses, reducing the failure possibility related to emergency response to enhance the efficiency as well.
期刊論文
1.Bodin, L.、Gass, S. I.(2003)。On teaching the analytic hierarchy process。Computers and Operations Research,30(10),1487-1497。  new window
2.Cassano-Piche, A. L.、Vicente, K. J.、Jamieson, G. A.(2009)。A test of Rasmussen's risk management framework in the food safety domain: BSE in the UK。Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science,10(4),283-304。  new window
3.Goode, N.、Salmon, P. M.、Lenne, M. G.、Hillard, P.(2014)。Systems thinking applied to safety during manual handling tasks in the transport and storage industry。Accident Analysis & Prevention,68,181-191。  new window
4.Jenkins, D. P.、Salmon, P. M.、Stanton, N. A.、Walker, G. H.(2010)。A systemic approach to accident analysis: a case study of the Stockwell shooting。Ergonomics,53(1),1-17。  new window
5.Johnson, C. W.、de Almeida, I. M.(2008)。An investigation into the loss of the Brazilian space programme's launch vehicle VLS-1 V03。Safety Science,46(1),38-53。  new window
6.Rasmussen, J.(1997)。Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem。Safety Science,27(2),183-213。  new window
7.Salmon, P. M.、Williamson, A.、Lenne, M. G.、Mitsopoulos, E.、Rudin-Brown, C. M.(2010)。Systems-based accident analysis in the led outdoor activity domain: application and evaluation of a risk management framework。Ergonomics,53(8),927-939。  new window
8.Salmon, P. M.、Goode, N.、Archer, F.、Spencer, C.、McArdle, D.、McClure, R. J.(2014)。A systems approach to examining disaster response: using AcciMap to describe the factors influencing bushfire response。Safety Science,70,114-122。  new window
9.Vicente, K. J.、Christoffersen, K.(2006)。The Walkerton E. coli outbreak: a test of Rasmussen's framework for risk management in a dynamic society。Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science,7(2),93-112。  new window
10.Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung、Chiang, Cheng-Hsin、Li, Chung-wei(2007)。Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL。Expert Systems with Applications,32(4),1028-1044。  new window
研究報告
1.Gabus, A.、Fontela, E.(1973)。Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility。Geneva:Battelle Geneva Research Center。  new window
2.交通部(2009)。空難災害防救業務計畫。臺北市:交通部。  延伸查詢new window
3.飛航安全調查委員會(2015)。臺灣2005-2014飛安統計報告。臺北市:飛航安全調查委員會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.International Civil Aviation Organization(2001)。Annex 13--Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation。Montreal:International Civil Aviation Organization。  new window
2.International Civil Aviation Organization(2013)。Safety Management Manual。Montreal:ICAO。  new window
3.內政部消防署(2008)。災害防救法。臺北市:內政部消防署。  延伸查詢new window
4.International Civil Aviation Organization(2013)。Annex 19-Safety Management。Montreal:ICAO。  new window
5.Rasmussen, J.、Svedung, I.(2000)。Proactive Risk Management in a Dynamic Society。Karlstad:Swedish Rescue Services Agency。  new window
其他
1.交通部民用航空局(2004)。機場緊急應變計畫應注意事項,臺北市:交通部民用航空局。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺北市政府工務局(2015)。搶救復興航空墜落基隆河飛機殘骸及墜毀擦撞環東高架橋護欄緊急處理總結報告,臺北市:臺北市政府。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE