:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論李諤及其〈請正文體書〉的時代意義
書刊名:高雄師大國文學報
作者:陳玉蕾
作者(外文):Chen, Yu-lei
出版日期:2018
卷期:28
頁次:頁103-134
主題關鍵詞:李諤上書正文體文體改革隋代Li ErA Petition to Correct the Literary FormReform of literature styleSui dynasty
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:3
學者咸以為,隋‧李諤的〈上書正文體〉乃提供古文運動前期理論的重要撰作,就作者生平來看,份屬儒者,出身自北朝的李諤在隋文帝朝提出「請正文體」的上書,其背景所關涉的應有西魏時期蘇綽的奏行〈大誥〉、個人儒學思維、文帝的政法理念、以及他個人對文學的認識。在上述背景的激盪下,〈上書正文體〉一文意旨因而呈現出復古、以儒教為依歸,以及文學決定政治等概念,此書的提出,同時也表現出李諤對隋文帝以法領文之嚴厲手段的支持。究其時代意義,則〈上書正文體〉不僅彰顯出隋代初期文學思潮的擺盪,更呈現了李諤意欲以儒學匡正時弊的政治目的;就其影響而言,雖然此書並未扭轉隋代的華麗文風,但此書既蓄養了唐代古文運動的理論動能,更為隋代社會革新留下史料,其價值當不僅止於文學面,它同時也具有社會、歷史的意義
People usually consider "A Petition to Correct the Literary Form", which was written by Li Er in Sui dynasty, is an important work to provide the theory of the early classical literature movement. According to the author's life, he was a scholar of Confucianism, and he was born in Northern dynasties. During the reign of the Emperor Wen of Sui, he wrote "A Petition to Correct the Literary Form". In this work, its backgrounds included Su Chuo's petition "The Great Caution" in Western Wei dynasty, Li Er's own thought of Confucianism, Emperor Wen's political thought, and Li Er's thought of literature. Based on the surge of the backgrounds above, the intensions of "A Petition to Correct the Literary Form" included to promote the classical literature, Confucianism-centered thought, and the concept that literature could seriously influence politics. The submission of this work showed that Li Er supported the Emperor Wen of Sui's policy to promote laws to specify literature's development. When it comes to historical meaning, "A Petition to Correct the Literary Form" had not only showed the surge of thought of literature during early Sui dynasty, but also showed Li Er's political intention to correct Confucianism. When it comes to the influence, this work had not changed the flowery writing styles in Sui dynasty, but it emerges the motivation of the classical literature movement in Tang dynasty. What's more, it also became a historical source about the reform of the society in Sui. It has not only the value of literature, but also social and historical meaning
期刊論文
1.莫山洪(2000)。論隋及初唐反駢觀念的形成。柳州師專學報,15(2),1-5。  延伸查詢new window
2.邢振霞(2008)。隋與初唐文學思想觀的比較。科技信息‧高教講壇,2008(27),212。  延伸查詢new window
3.康震(2010)。關隴集團與隋唐之際的文學觀念。文藝研究,2010(4),86-94。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.林晉士(2009)。論「西魏蘇綽奏行大誥」之性質與影響。第六屆魏晉南北朝文學與思想學術研討會。臺北:里仁書局。375-413。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.賀貽孫(1983)。詩筏。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅宗強(2003)。隋唐五代文學思想史。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳兢、謝保成(2003)。貞觀政要集校。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.顏之推、王利器(1984)。顏氏家訓集解。臺北市:明文書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.魏徵、楊家駱(1980)。隋書。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.李百藥、楊家駱(1980)。北齊書。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.李延壽、楊家駱(1980)。北史。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.李延壽(1987)。南史。上海:古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.令狐德棻、楊家駱(1997)。周書。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.瞿曇悉達(1987)。開元占經。上海:古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.歐陽脩、宋祈、楊家駱(1995)。新唐書。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳經(1985)。尚書詳解。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.湯一介、李中華(2014)。中國儒學史。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.王夫之(1974)。讀通鑒論。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.秦蕙田(1983)。五禮通考。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關期刊論文
 
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE