:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國禁止行賄外國公務員法制之探討
書刊名:刑事政策與犯罪防治研究
作者:黃思翰
作者(外文):Huang, Szu-han
出版日期:2018
卷期:17
頁次:頁3-10
主題關鍵詞:行賄外國公務員海外反貪腐法貪腐防制企業遵法BriberyForeign officialsFCPAEnterprisesCompliance program
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:3
近年有關禁止行賄外國公務員之議題已受到國際社會重視,尤其當美國政府對於連反海外反貪腐法(Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FCPA)之執法地域範圍從歐美擴及於亞洲時,我國企業及科技公司應更加重視企業行賄外國公務員之防制以降低相關法律風險。然而,過去我國肅貪政策係以公部門貪腐防制為重心。雖然我國於2003年將行賄外國公務員行為刑罰化,惟從防制跨國賄賂犯罪與提升企業競爭力之角度而言,現行法存有許多疑義尚待釐清,並使得我國企業無妥適之法律制度可資遵循。本文旨在探討我國禁止行賄外國公務員規範與實務之相關問題,並嘗試從美國法觀點與實證質性研究分析我國防制行賄外國公務員及企業道法應有之制度內涵,以及提出立法政策建議,以兼顧打擊跨國行賄與保障企業利益之目的。
In recent years, anti-bribery of foreign public officials has received high attention by the international community. While the U.S. government expands the enforcement region of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) from Europe and America to Asia, the enterprises and technology industries in Taiwan should pay more attention to the prohibition against bribing foreign officials in order to decrease legal risk. In the past, the main regulate focus of the corruption prohibition laws in Taiwan were mainly on the public sector. Although the bribery of foreign officials became criminalized in Taiwan in 2003, from the perspective of implementing the anti-bribery policy and enhancing the competitiveness edge of the enterprises, the laws currently in force leave many problems to be solved, and the enterprises was left no clear rules to comply. For the first part of this article, it will introduce the issues currently existed in the anti-bribery laws in Taiwan. In the second part, this article will consider and provide legislative sugges-tions that may improve Taiwan's anti-bribery policy from the perspective of U.S. law and on the basis of qualitative research conducted.
期刊論文
1.陳文智(20070600)。試論「吹哨者保護法制」之引進。全國律師,11(6),81-96。  延伸查詢new window
2.林志潔(20150700)。反制跨國行賄與強化企業法令遵循--以美國海外反貪腐法(FCPA)為例。月旦法學,242,5-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳一銘、李智仁(20080400)。公司治理與公益通報保護法制。萬國法律,158,106-122。  延伸查詢new window
4.Koehler, Mike(2007)。The Unique Foreign Corrupt Practice Act Compliance Challenges of Doing Business in China。WIS. INT'L L.J.,25。  new window
5.郭大維(20130115)。沉默未必是金--吹哨者法制之建構與企業不法行為之防範。臺灣法學雜誌,216,46-60。  延伸查詢new window
6.張天一(20141000)。「公益揭露人保護法草案」評析。月旦法學,233,275-281。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡南芳(20091200)。吹哨人法制之研究--以沙氏法案關於吹哨人工作權保障之規定為核心。東吳法研論集,5,95-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.林志潔(2015)。反制跨國企業海外行賄--以美國海外反貪腐法為例。聯合國反貪腐公約專題學術研討會。臺北:法務部廉政署出版。1-12。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳耀祥(2015)。政府採購程序中訂定揭弊者保護規範之研究。聯合國反貪腐公約專題學術研討會。法務部廉政署。119-143。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.林志潔、林良榮、張天一、薛景文、陳俊元(2014)。私部門公益通報者保護法立法研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃銘傑(2005)。組織內部不法資訊揭露法制之研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林鈺雄(2016)。新刑法總則。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.OECD(2014)。OECD Foreign Bribery Report: An Analysis of the Crime of Bribery of Foreign Public Officials。OECD。  new window
3.李華驎、鄭佳綾(2014)。公司的品格:22個案例,了解公司治理和上市櫃公司的財務陷阱。台北:先覺出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.甘添貴、臺灣刑事法學(2005)。刑法總則修正重點之理論與實務。臺北:元照出版。  延伸查詢new window
5.程挽華、楊戊龍(2010)。英國、紐西蘭、澳洲(維多利亞省)揭弊保護立法比較。公益揭弊--職場倫理新趨勢。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(20100504)。一吐冤大頭怨氣!臺灣打贏拉法葉案,http://news.tvbs.com.tw/entry/91296。  延伸查詢new window
2.(20160614)。中國企業正大舉併購歐洲及日本企業之策略評析,http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/post/Read.aspx?PostID=12502。  延伸查詢new window
3.(20170330)。行政院對民國105年進出口貿易量之說明,http://www.ey.gov.tw/state/News_Content3.aspx?n=1DA8EDDD65ECB8D4&s=8A1DCA5A3BFAD09C。  延伸查詢new window
4.政風機構函送貪瀆線索案件來源統計表,http://www.aac.moj.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=36882&CtUnit=10773&BaseDSD=7&mp=289。  延伸查詢new window
5.(20100510)。國際商務仲裁的判決(拉法葉案的真相),http://www.taiwantt.org.tw/tw/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2161&Itemid=5。  new window
6.貪污治罪條例法條沿革,http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lglawc/lawsingle?00323ED8CDBF000000000000000001400000000400FFFFFD00^04551092011300^000E4001001。  延伸查詢new window
7.(20141222)。Alstom Pleads Guilty and Agrees to Pay 2 Million Criminal Penalty to Resolve Foreign Bribery Charges,https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/alstom-pleads-guilty-and-agrees-pay-772-million-criminal-penalty-resolve-foreignbribery。  new window
8.Hardoon, Deborah,Heinrich, Finn(2011)。Bribe Payers Index 2011,http://files.transparency.org/content/download/98/395/2011_BPI_EN.pdf。  new window
9.(20170112)。Related Enforcement Actions,http://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/related-enforcement-actions。  new window
10.(20021210)。Syncor Taiwan, INC. Pleads Guilty to Violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2002/December/02_crm_707.htm。  new window
11.U.S. DEP'T OF JUSTICE CRIMINAL DIV(2016)。THE FRAUD SECTION'S FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT ENFORCEMENT PLAN AND GUIDANCE,https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/838416/download。  new window
12.Transparency Int'l(20160201)。Corruption Perceptions Index 2015,http://www.transparency.org/cpi2015/。  new window
13.U.S. Dep't of Justice Criminal Div.,U.S. Sec. & Exch, Comm'n Enf't Div.(2012)。A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-fraud/legacy/2015/01/16/guide.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃宏森(2010)。政府採購與揭弊保護:以蕭秋德揭弊案為例。公益揭發--職場倫理新趨勢。臺北:巨流出版。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE