:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中區環境教育區域中心運作之成效探討研究
書刊名:臺中教育大學學報. 數理科技類
作者:林明瑞江佩芸
作者(外文):Lin, Min-rayJiang, Pei-yun
出版日期:2018
卷期:32:2
頁次:頁1-27
主題關鍵詞:成效評估專業領導增能學習環境教育區域中心邏輯模式Effectiveness evaluationProfessional leadershipSkill building learningEnvironmental education regional centerLogic model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
為增進我國環境教育的能量,提升各區環境教育社群學習成效及環境教育推動能量,行政院環保署於民國103年起分別在我國北、中、南、東四區域成立「環境教育區域中心」,期望透過各區域中心建構專業領導團隊,結合當地的夥伴資源,共同推動環境教育區域中心計畫五大工作項目。為瞭解環境教育區域中心之運作機制及推動成效,本研究應用方案邏輯模式之「投入」、「產出」和「成效」等三個基本要素,並透過參與者問卷調查、訪談、參與式觀察、文件分析等方式,針對中區環境教育區域中心(以下簡稱中區環教中心)執行此計畫之現況及成效進行評估。研究結果顯示,中區環教中心執行計畫五大目標中:一、專業領導:產出「全國性環境教育卓越發展指引」共四套,舉辦實務增能課程及分享交流工作坊,參與者滿意度極佳;二、增能學習:舉辦環境教育增能工作坊能有效提升參與者之環境素養(82.3~100.0%);三、科技支援:以「環境議題解決及行動力」為主軸,編製完成各個適合機關、中小學及個適合社區採用的環境教育課程教案,大致均能有效提升參與者之環境教育素養;四、研究評估:建置適合區域中心使用之「成效評估評量系統」,經由評估、回饋與調整運作機制之過程,有效提升本中心計畫之執行成效;五、夥伴推廣:在103年度結合在地環教場域舉辦之地方增能工作坊,成效及滿意度皆明顯提升為92.8及91.9%,且有效提升參與者之環境素養(81.1~97.9%)。再者,計畫五大目標「總執行成效」為良好(4.6分)。各目標之成效由高至低依序則為「專業領導」(4.8)>「夥伴推廣」(4.7)>「研究評估」(4.5)=「增能學習」(4.5)>「科技支援」(4.3),即執行成效最佳為「專業領導」,最低為「科技支援」。
In order to enhance learning efficiency and promote community of environmental education in various parts of Taiwan, the Environmental Protection Administration set up four 'Environmental Education Regional Centers (EERC)' in northern, central, southern and eastern Taiwan in 2014 , hoping to integrate partners' resources in relation to five aspects of EERC programs. In order to understand the effectiveness of the Central Environmental Education Regional Center, this study evaluated three basic factors, including Input, Output and Outcomes of the Logic Model, and conducted a participant questionnaire investigation, interviews, participant observation and document analysis. The results show that the outcomes of the five goals of the Implementation Plan of the Central Environmental Education Regional Center, 1. Professional Leadership: the four output sets of the 'National Environmental Education Excellence Development Guidelines', holding practical skills building courses and experiences-sharing and exchange workshops, and excellent participant satisfaction. 2. Skills Building Learning: the environmental education literacy of participants can be promoted by the skills building workshops in environmental education (82.3 ~ 100.0%). 3. Science and Technology Support: taking 'solving and acting on environmental issues' as the main axis, to compile four sets of teaching plans suitable for government agencies, primary and secondary schools, and implementing six sets of teaching plans suitable for the community, and to generally enhance participants' environmental education literacy. 4. Research and Evaluation: An assessment system for the effectiveness of the Regional Center was built and used to evaluate, provide feedback, and adjust the operation mechanism of the Regional Center for Environmental Education; this system can promote the effectiveness of Regional Center. 5. Partnership Dissemination: In the year 2015 , due to the local environmental education capability building workshop, which was held in the local environmental education field, the effectiveness and participant satisfaction were significantly improved to 92.8 and 91.9 %, respectively, and the environmental education literacy of the participants was effectively promoted ( 81.1 ~ 97.9%). Furthermore, the overall implementation effectiveness of the five plan main goals was good (score 4.6). The effectiveness of the five aspects from highest to lowest was as follows: Professional Leadership (score 4.8) > Partnership Dissemination (score 4.7) > Research and Evaluation (score 4.5) = Building Capability Learning (score 4.5) > Science and Technology Support (score 4.3). Professional Leadership had the best effectiveness, and the worst was Science and Technology Support.
期刊論文
1.Helitzer, D.、Hollis, C.、Hernandez, B. U.、Sanders, M.、Roybal, S.、Deusen, I. V.(2010)。Evaluation for community-based programs: The integration of logic models and factor analysis。Evaluation and Program Planning,33,223-233。  new window
會議論文
1.石偉勳、柯慧雯、梁明煌(2012)。在地小農參與在地食材計畫的反思。2012環境教育學術暨實務交流研討會。臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.環保署(2014)。臺灣環境教育區域中心計畫跨域與增能國際研討會會議手冊。臺灣環境教育區域中心計畫跨域與增能國際研討會。臺北市:環保署。  延伸查詢new window
3.Chou, J.、Pan, S. L.(2012)。Application Logic Model to develop, implement, and evaluate interpretive program in Taiwan's nature center。The 7th annual National Association for Interpretation International Conference。Kailua-Kona, Hawaii。  new window
研究報告
1.林明瑞(2015)。中區環境教育區域中心設置專案工作計畫期中報告 (計畫編號:EPA-104-EA04-03-D021)。臺北:環保署。  延伸查詢new window
2.林明瑞(2014)。中區環境教育區域中心設置專案工作計畫期末報告 (計畫編號:EPA-103-EA04-03-A148)。臺北:環保署。  延伸查詢new window
3.許民陽、徐榮崇(2014)。環境教育增能規畫之先期規畫專案工作計畫期末專案工作報告 (計畫編號:EPA-102-EA04-03-A290)。臺北:環保署。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳麗玉(2015)。適合各級學校採行之「環境議題解決及行動力教學活動課程」規劃、教學之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張惠玲(2016)。「因應氣候變遷」教案發展及社區民眾學習成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂効修(2012)。台灣兩棲類調查志工數位培訓課程建置與成效評估(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊淑慧(2016)。適合機關採行之「環境議題解決及行動力教學活動課程」規劃、教學之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.周儒(2011)。實踐環境教育--環境學習中心。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾淑惠(2004)。教育評估模式。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.W. K. Kellgg Foudation、趙佳音、中華社會福利聯合勸募協會(2011)。邏輯模式發展指南--利用邏輯模式整合計畫評估與行動。臺北:巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡啟源(2015)。方案規劃與評鑑。臺北:雙葉書廊。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭怡世(2015)。成效導向的方案規劃與評估。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
6.環保署(2014)。環境教育增能計畫之先期規劃專案工作計畫期末專案工作報告。臺北市:環保署。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.徐榮崇(2014)。臺灣環境教育區域中心設置規劃,http://www.tesd.org.tw/enp/topic_reports.php?ec=8&iid=19。  延伸查詢new window
2.UW-Extension(2004)。Program action-logic model. The Program Development and Evaluation,http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html。  new window
3.Thomson, G.,Hoffman, J.,Staniforth, S.(2005)。Measuring the success of environmental education programs,https://www.google.com.tw/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=logic+model+evaluation+examples+environmental+education。  new window
圖書論文
1.Weiss, C. H.(1997)。Theory-based evaluation: Past, present and future。Progress and future directions in evaluation: Perspectives on theory, practice and methods。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關期刊論文
 
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE