資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.135.202.88)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
重訪德與福的關係:正向心理學的新詮釋及其對品德教育的啟示
書刊名:
當代教育研究季刊
作者:
陳伊琳
作者(外文):
Chen, Yi-lin
出版日期:
2018
卷期:
26:4
頁次:
頁47-82
主題關鍵詞:
品德教育
;
正向心理學
;
招牌優勢
;
品格個殊化
;
德福一體
;
Character education
;
Positive psychology
;
Signature strength
;
The individualisation of character
;
The unity of virtue and happiness
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
3
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:0
點閱:6
研究目的:「德福一體」這個古老的爭議性學說在當前新興的正向心理學中似有復甦跡象,因正向心理學家宣稱要證明正向特質-品格優勢與德行,在促成真實的幸福中扮演不可或缺的關鍵角色。本文主張關心品德教育的人應當深入探討正向心理學關於德福關係的論證,因這將可回應「為何要有德」與「為何德行值得追求」等問題,此些根本問題鮮為當代品德教育論述所處理。據此,本文旨在分析正向心理學的德行觀與幸福觀,繼而檢視其對於德福關係的說明,最終提出由正向心理學視角重訪德福一體說對於當代品德教育的重要啟示。研究設計/方法/取徑:本研究屬於教育哲學性質,採用方法主要為概念分析、論證分析與涵義詮釋。針對正向心理學論「德福關係」所牽涉的數個關鍵概念-包含品格優勢、德行、幸福等進行概念分析,著重在探討概念內涵與彼此之間的關係。其次針對正向心理學有關德福一體的論述進行論證分析。最終闡明正向心理學有關德福一體的新詮釋對於當代品德教育的啟示。研究發現或結論:檢視完正向心理學有關德福一體的論證過後,本文指出由於正向心理學與當代品德教育所持的德行觀念有異,正向心理學宣稱要為品德教育方案的設計提供理論架構的承諾並無法實現。儘管如此,它廣義的德行觀驅使我們重新思考究竟好品格是什麼(其具體內涵為何)?以及單純從倫理意義上來設想好品格是否恰當?這狹義的品德教育正是當前所推動的。本文將指出英國伯明罕大學品德與美德銀禧中心所推行的品格教育正往正向心理學擘劃的新方向邁進。此外,正向心理學所提出的招牌優勢概念有助於闡明當代品德教育遺漏的重要課題-品格個殊化。研究原創性/價值:本研究價值在於揭示正向心理學這門新興品格科學的重要論點-培養德行以達成幸福,實與古希臘幸福論所持「德福一體」這個古老哲學學說益趣相同。重訪此重要論題揭櫫哲學智慧與科學知識皆對於德福關係同感興趣。教育政策建議或實務意涵:本研究重要建議與實務意涵主要有二。首先在品德教育教學實務上,正向心理學闡明德行培養與展現對於個人幸福之價值,有助於補足當前品德教育之證成流於工具性論證之不足。本研究指出,可從德行對於個人幸福的意義,來回應學生提出「為何要有德」、「德行為何值得追求」等提問。其次在教育政策上,正向心理學內涵豐富的品格優勢清單驅使我們重新思考「好品格」的意義,以及當前品德教育單純側重於「道德德行」之涵養是否不夠完整與適當的問題。關於此,英國伯明罕大學品德與美德銀禧中心倡導的品格教育可供對照。
以文找文
Purpose: The age-old controversial doctrine the 'unity of virtue and Happiness' (UVH) seems reviving in positive psychology (PP), when PP claims to demonstrate that positive traits, i.e. character strengths and virtues, play a decisive role in promoting authentic happiness. The author argues that people concerned with character education (CE) should inquire into PP's arguments about the relation between virtue and happiness because they can respond to the questions 'why be virtuous' and 'why is virtue worth pursuing'. These fundamental issues are seldom addressed by contemporary CE discourses. Accordingly, this paper is aimed to analyse PP's conceptions of virtue and happiness, to examine PP's elaboration on the relationship between virtue and happiness, and finally, to revisit and draw important implications the doctrine of UVH has for contemporary CE from the perspective of PP. Design/methodology/approach: This study belongs to philosophy of education in nature and the major methods applied are conceptual analysis, argument analysis, and implication interpretation. Certain core concepts involved in the relationship between virtue and happiness developed by PP are analysed by investigating their respective connotations and their relations. Next, an argument analysis is conducted on PP's argument for UVH. Finally, some important implications for contemporary CE are derived from this new interpretation of UVH. Findings: After an examination of PP's argument for UVH, it is found that, given the different conceptions of virtue held by PP and CE, PP's promise to provide a theoretical framework for design of character development programmes cannot be kept. Nonetheless, PP's conception of virtue in a broad sense urges us to reconsider what good character amounts to and whether it is appropriate to conceive of good character in a purely ethical sense, where CE is currently proceeding. The author points out that the CE proposed by The Jubilee Centre for Character & Virtues, University of Birmingham, UK, is developed in the new direction of PP. Besides, the concept of signature strength helps to illustrate a missing piece of the puzzle of contemporary CE, the idea of character individualisation. Originality/value: The distinctive value of this study lies in revealing the fact that cultivating virtue to achieve happiness, the central thesis of the new character science PP, is in actuality in tune with the philosophical doctrine of UVH proposed by ancient eudaimonism. For that matter, it is shown that both philosophical wisdom and scientific knowledge are interested in the intricate relationship between virtue and happiness. Recommendations for Educational Policy / Implications in Practice: Two important implications it has for CE are to be noted. Firstly, with regard to the teaching of CE, PP's elaboration on the value of virtue cultivation and exercise for personal happiness helps to make up for the deficient tendency to instrumental arguments that current support for contemporary CE has. In response to students' queries 'why be virtuous' and 'why is virtue worth pursuing', personal happiness is arguably an answer. Secondly, in terms of educational policy, the much richer list of character strengths made by PP compels us to reconsider what a good character amounts to and specifically whether it is complete and appropriate for contemporary CE to simply centre on inculcation of moral virtues. In this regard, the new version of CE proposed by The Jubilee Centre for Character & Virtues, University of Birmingham, UK is an important point of reference.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Peterson, Christopher、Park, Nansook、Seligman, Martin E. P.(2005)。Orientations to Happiness and Life Satisfaction: The Full Life Versus the Empty Life。Journal of Happiness Studies,6(1),25-41。
2.
Dahlsgaard, Katherine、Peterson, Christopher、Seligman, Martin E. P.(2005)。Shared Virtue: The Convergence of Valued Human Strengths Across Culture and History。Review of General Psychology,9(3),203-213。
3.
Carr, D.(2007)。Moralized psychology or psychologized morality? Ethics and psychology in recent theorizing about moral and character education。Educational Theory,57(4),389-402。
4.
Kristjánsson, Kristján(2002)。In defence of "non-expansive" character education。Journal of Philosophy of Education,36(2),135-156。
5.
Annas, J.(1998)。Virtue and eudaimonism。Social Philosophy and Policy,15(1),37-55。
6.
Prior, W. J.(2001)。Eudaimonism and virtue。The Journal of Value Inquiry,35(3),325-342。
7.
Snow, N. E.(2008)。Virtue and flourishing。Journal of Social Philosophy,39(2),225-245。
8.
Sumner, L. W.(1998)。Is virtue its own reward?。Social Philosophy and Policy,15(1),18-36。
9.
Woolfolk, R. L.、Wasserman, R. H.(2005)。Count no one happy: Eudaimonia and positive psychology。Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology,25(1),81-90。
10.
Park, N.、Peterson, C.(2006)。Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for youth。Journal of Adolescence,29(6),891-909。
11.
蘇永明(2017)。對EQ與正向心理學的商榷。臺灣教育哲學,1(1),117-152。
延伸查詢
12.
Chen, Y.-L.(2013)。A missing piece of contemporary character education puzzle: The individualisation of character。Studies in Philosophy and Education,32(4),345-360。
13.
Finkelberg, M.(2002)。Virtue and circumstances: On the city-state concept of arete。The American Journal of Philology,123(1),35-49。
14.
Kagan, S.(1998)。Rethinking intrinsic value。The Journal of Ethics,2(4),277-297。
15.
Sandler, R.(2005)。What makes a character trait a virtue?。The Journal of Value Inquiry,39(3),383-397。
16.
Seligman, Martin E. P.、Ernst, R. M.、Gillham, J.、Reivich, K.、Linkins, M.(2009)。Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions。Oxford Review of Education,35(3),293-311。
圖書
1.
Trianosky, G.(1993)。Natural affection and responsibility for character: A critique of Kantian views of the virtues。Identity, character, and morality: Essays in moral psychology。London, UK:MIT。
2.
Aristotle、Ross, William David(1998)。The Nicomachean ethics。Oxford University Press。
3.
Flanagan, Owen J.(1991)。Varieties of Moral Personality: Ethics and Psychological Realism。Harvard University Press。
4.
McKinnon, C.(1999)。Character, virtue theories, and the vices。Ontario:Broadview。
5.
Haidt, Jonathan(2006)。The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom。New York:Basic Books。
6.
Ball, Terence(1995)。Reappraising Political Theory: Revisionist Studies in the History of Political Thought。Oxford:Clarendon Press。
7.
Delle Fave, A.、Massimini, F.、Bassi, M.(2011)。Psychological selections and optimal experience across cultures。New York:Springer Science & Business Media B.V.。
8.
Griffin, J.(1990)。Well-being: Its meaning, measurement and moral importance。Oxford, UK:Clarendon Press。
9.
Kristjánsson, K.(2013)。Virtues and vices in positive psychology: A philosophical critique。Cambridge University Press。
10.
Seligman, M. E. P.(2002)。Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realise your potential for lasting fulfilment。New York:Free Press。
11.
White, J.(2011)。Exploring well-being in schools: A guide to making children's lives more fulfilling。London:Routledge。
12.
White, N.(2002)。Individual and conflict in Greek ethics。New York:Oxford University Press。
13.
Goldie, Peter(2004)。On personality。Routledge。
14.
Seligman, M. E. P.、洪蘭(2003)。真實的快樂。遠流。
延伸查詢
15.
Seligman, Martin E. P.(2011)。Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being。Free Press。
16.
Peterson, C.、Seligman, M. E. P.(2004)。Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification。Oxford University Press。
17.
Kupperman, J. J.(1991)。Character。Oxford University Press。
其他
1.
教育部(2014)。教育部品德教育促進方案,臺北市:教育部。,https://ce.naer.edu.tw/policy.php。
延伸查詢
2.
陳伊琳(20141100)。品格長處與德行在促成個體幸福/快樂中的角色:評介M. E. P. Seligman著《Authentic Happiness》。
延伸查詢
3.
Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues(2017)。A framework for character education in schools,https://uobschool.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Framework-for-Character-Education-2017-Jubilee-Centre.pdf。
圖書論文
1.
McLaughlin, T. H.、Halstead, J. M.(1999)。Education in character and virtue。Education in morality。Routledge。
2.
Parry, R.(2009)。Ancient ethical theory。The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy。
3.
Csikszentmihalyi, M.(2000)。The contribution of flow to positive psychology。The science of optimism and hope: Research essays in honor of Martin E. P. Seligman。Templeton Foundation Press。
4.
Diener, E.、Ryan, K.(2011)。National accounts of well-being。Applied positive psychology: Improving everyday life, health, schools, work, and society。New York:Routledge。
5.
Nicgorski, W.、Ellrod, F. E.(1986)。Moral character。Act and agent: Philosophical foundations for moral education and character development。Lanham, MD:University Press of America。
6.
Peterson, C.、Park, N.(2011)。Character strengths and virtues: Their role in wellbeing。Applied positive psychology: Improving everyday life, health, schools, work, and society。New York:Routledge。
7.
Rowe, C.(1993)。Ethics in ancient Greece。A companion to ethics。Oxford, UK:Blackwell Publishing。
8.
Kupperman, J. J.(1999)。Virtue, character, and moral dispositions。Virtue ethics and moral education: Routledge international studies in the philosophy of education。London:Routledge。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
敬畏情緒量表的編製發展與驗證之研究
2.
I. Morris幸福課程的哲學檢視
3.
評介《亞里斯多德式品格教育》(2015)
4.
對EQ與正向心理學的商榷
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
Urmson超義務理念評析及其品德教育蘊義
2.
中世紀城鎮或計畫性花園城市
3.
評介《品格教育在英國的崛起:英雄、魔龍與品格迷思》
4.
I. Morris幸福課程的哲學檢視
5.
「家庭參與及商校協作」:培育學生面對挑戰的希望感
6.
英國品格教育現況評析及其對臺灣品德教育的啟示
7.
評介《亞里斯多德式品格教育》(2015)
8.
Michael Oakeshott論博雅教育及大學教育
9.
Aristotle幸福論觀點下的致福之道與幸福的脆弱性:幸福、運氣與品德教育
10.
歐美國家品德教育發展趨勢與中學概況
11.
品格長處與德行在促成個體幸福/快樂中的角色:評介M. E. P. Seligman著《Authentic Happiness》
12.
The Doctrine of the Unity of the Virtues and Its Implications for Character Education
13.
Can an Individual Be Held Responsible for His/Her Own Personal (Moral) Character: How Moral Luck Challenges the Notion that Individuals Are Responsible for Their Own (Moral) Character
14.
A Critical Examination of the Appropriateness of Characterising Character Education in Terms of the Inculcation of Virtues
15.
G. Harman與J. Doris社會心理學情境論與德行倫理學的品格辯論及其對品格教育的啟示
QR Code