:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:2002年雅典公約修正議定書對我國海商法修正旅客運送之啟示
書刊名:航運季刊
作者:于惠蓉 引用關係張志清 引用關係鄭若英
作者(外文):Yu, Hui-lungChang, Chih-chingCheng, Jo-ying
出版日期:2018
卷期:27:2
頁次:頁99-126
主題關鍵詞:旅客運送海商法修正雅典公約郵輪產業Carriage of passengersModification of maritime lawAthens conventionCruise business
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:1
我國海商法對運送之規範,以貨物運送為主軸,對旅客運送規定則相對簡略。海商法第79條:「旅客之運送,除本節規定外,準用本章第一節之規定。」將貨物運送相關規定適用於旅客運送,但二者之性質差異非常大。旅客無須運送人代為裝卸、搬移、堆存、保管,而其人身傷亡及行李毀損滅失、運送義務、免責事由及賠償事項與貨物運送不同,以貨物運送之思維套用於旅客運送實不妥當。近年來海上旅客運送已大幅成長,尤其郵輪產業興起為然。為因應國際旅客運送之發展,1974年雅典公約經三次議定書之修正,尤其2002年議定書大幅修正旅客運送規範。我國海商法似可採雅典公約內容作為未來修正旅客運送規定之依據,與國際接軌,並保障旅客權益。本論文探討雅典公約體系之適用範圍;責任期間;責任制度;責任限額;運送人、履約運送人其受僱人及代理人之責任;強制保險及直接訴訟;訴訟時效;管轄法院;任意約定的禁止等議題,以及客票之性質、契約之解除;船舶適航能力及遲到之責任。期能深入瞭解雅典公約體系之內容及適用上應考量之因素,以提供未來修正海商法採用雅典公約時之參考。
For those rules relating to carriage by sea, Taiwan's Maritime Law mainly focuses on carriage of goods. The provisions governing carriage of passengers are less significant and even rough in their contexts. Article 79 of Taiwan's Maritime Law provides: "Unless otherwise provided in this Section, the provisions of Section I of this Chapter apply mutatis mutandis to the carriage of passengers." However, there exists significant difference between the carriage of goods and the carriage of passengers. At least, there are no needs to load, discharge, handle, stow, care for and keep those passengers on board. It would be unjustifiable to allow those rules relating to carriage of goods to apply mutatis mutandis to the carriage of passengers. In fact, the business of carriage of passengers has developed prosperously in recent years, especially cruise journey. The Athens Convention 1974 and its Protocol of 2002 have provided complete regulations to cope with the development of international carriage of passengers. Taiwan's Maritime Law is inevitably to adopt those rules provided by the Athens Convention in its future modification. It is therefore necessary to explore the contexts of the Athens Convention in order to understand the applicability of its rules and regulations. This article analyzes the Athens Convention provisions concerning the scope of application, period of carriage, carriers, liability system, liability limitation, the liabilities of the carriers, performing carrier and their employees and agents, compulsory insurance and direct claim against the insurer or financial security provider, limit of liability, competent jurisdiction, invalidity of contractual provisions, nature of passenger ticket, rescission of the contract, seaworthiness, and liability relating to delay in transit. It aims to provide reference for the future modification of Taiwan's Maritime Law.
期刊論文
1.黃正宗(20120400)。我國海上旅客運送責任之探討。東海大學法學研究,36,227-270。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林俊宏、巫志龍(2011)。雅典公約架構下中國大陸與臺灣海上旅客運送法規之比較。貿易政策論叢,16,227-280。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lewins, K.(2004)。The cruise ship industry--liabilities to passengers for breach of s52 and s74 Trade Practices Act 1974。MLAANZ Journal,18,30-54。  new window
4.Epstein, J. S.(2013)。Athens convention, part 2: 2002 protocol becomes effective in April 2014。Louisiana Advocates,28(7),21-27。  new window
5.Soyer, B.(2002)。Sundry considerations on the draft protocol to the Athens convention relating to the carriage of passengers and their luggage at sea 1974。Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce,33(4),1-22。  new window
6.尤重道(2011)。定型化契約之概念與法律效果暨實務見解分析。消費者保護研究,17,153-198。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Leloudas, G.、Soyer, B.(2017)。Carriage of passengers by sea--Athens regime, liabilities and the future。The 13th Annual International Colloquium, Maritime Liabilities in a Regional and Global Context。IISTL, Swansea University。  new window
學位論文
1.Chovanec, V.(2013)。Cruise Ship Passengers and Their Rights(碩士論文)。Lund University。  new window
圖書
1.容繼業(1996)。旅行業理論與實務。臺北市:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.司玉琢(2003)。海商法。北京:法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.施智謀(1999)。海商法。台北:施智謀。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉宗榮(2007)。新海商法。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉宗榮(2016)。海商法。臺北市:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.王文宇(2014)。契約解釋與任意規定--比較法與案例研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃裕凱(2008)。國際海商暨海事法基本文件(中英文對照)第二冊運送與貿易。黃裕凱。  延伸查詢new window
8.傅國民、葉紅軍(2002)。2002年海上旅客及其行李運輸雅典公約介紹。中華人民共和國交通部。  延伸查詢new window
9.Singh, M. N.(1983)。International Maritime Law Conventions。London:Stevens & Sons。  new window
10.Kalosh, A.(2014)。2002 Athens Convention Enters into Force, Substantially Raising Liability Limits。Seatrade UBM (UK) Ltd.。  new window
11.王澤鑑(2012)。民法概要。臺北:王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
12.柯澤東(2000)。海商法修訂新論。元照。  延伸查詢new window
13.張新平(2010)。海商法。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
14.梁宇賢(1999)。海商法精義。梁宇賢。  延伸查詢new window
15.Hill, Christopher、Kulkarni, Yash(2003)。Maritime Law。NY:Informa Law from Routledge。  new window
其他
1.中華民國法務部(2018)。民事訴訟的舉證責任,https://www.moj.gov.tw/cp-296-62794-d0_ebf-001.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development, Australian Government(2017)。Carriage of Passengers and Their Luggage by Sea,Canberra。,https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/maritime/business/liability/files/athens_convention_discussion_paper.pdf。  new window
3.魏苑玲(20170312)。臺灣超越新加坡、日本躍居亞洲郵輪旅客量No.2,https://www.ttnmedia.com/?p=8433。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE