我國憲法訴訟法新制自2022年初施行，截至2023年6月底18個
月內，憲法法庭依新法已作成29號憲法判決及2號實體裁定。相較於
司法院大法官審理案件法施行期間平均每個月作成解釋數量，新制
下憲法法庭每個月判決產出速率略有提升；在此同時，憲法法庭所
面對的聲請案件數量卻明顯增加，年度未結案件數及不受理聲請數
量也大幅增加。整體而言，人民聲請案件不受理數量及比例都較舊
制更高，此一現象，與新法施行前各項準備工作所強調的人民近用
目標，並不相符。憲法法庭在上述審理能量緊繃的背景下，其所產
出的各號憲法判決順應新法「全面司法化」取向，其判決主文回應
聲請人「應受判決事項之聲明」更加多樣化，判決理由也因法定記
載事項明確而篇幅明顯增加。尤其值得注意者，新制下憲法法庭認
定法規或裁判牴觸憲法比例不低，各號判決議題選擇及其主文決定
方向似乎也暗合當前社會關注趨勢。憲法訴訟法正式施行半年，司
法院即提案修正部分條文，立法院並於今（2023）年5月間僅三讀通
過其中6條修正條文；憲法法庭成員替換之後，憲法訴訟法新制勢將
持續磨合調整。

The Constitutional Court Act of Taiwan entered into force in the
beginning of 2022. Up to the end of June 2023, the Constitutional Court
of Taiwan has presented 29 judgements. Compared to the monthly output
of the Court under the replaced Constitutional Interpretation Procedure
Act, there is a moderate increase under the new procedure system. This
moderate increase is a marvelous performance taking into account of its
immensely increasing input of pleadings filed. The rejected as well as
pending pleadings also increase immensely, anyway. That does not
correspond to a widened access to the people as planed within the goals
of the new procedure system. The judgements of the Court change into a
fully judicial style with a diversified tenor and a prolonged and more
deliberative writing of holdings. Last but not least, the Court tends to
choose cases with widespread social concern and decide in favor of
certain direction. With the substitution of members of the Court, further
inconveniences and adjustments of the new procedure system are
expected in the near future.