臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：公共行政研究之本質、標準、議題與知識成長:方法論的觀點
書刊名：中國行政評論
作者：江明修 引用關係／陳玉山／王雯玲
作者(外文)：Chiang, Min-hisu／Chen, Yu-san／Wang, Wen-ling
出版日期：1996
卷期：5:2
頁次：頁89-120
主題關鍵詞：公共行政學；研究方法論；社會實體；品質標準；核心議題；知識成長；The study of public administration；Research methodology；Social reality；Quality criterion；Core issue；Knowledge growth
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:46
本文首先回顧公共行政學方法論爭辯的歷程與其主要論述，介紹各種不同的立論與主張，其次，分析在公共行政學方法論上，實證論與後實證論兩種典範爭辯的四項焦點議題，即科學本質、品質標準、核心議題與知識成長，希望從中獲得更寬廣的方法論視野，並進以開啟公共行政學知識的心窗，以及對公共行政理論的建構及成長有所助益。
This paper reviewed the major literatures of methodological debate in the study of public administration. It also showed the basic values and assumptions of different methodological stances. In addition, this paper discussed four foci: socia1 constructive reality and science, quality criterion, core issue and knowledge growth. It is expected that this effort can help us not only obtain a broader methodological vision, but also create a better approach to the understanding of knowledge growth in the study of public administration.
期刊論文
1.White, Jay D.(1986)。Dissertations and publications in public administration。Public Administration Review，46(3)，227-234。  new window
2.Adams, G. B.(1992)。Enthralled with Modernity: The Historical Context of Knowledge and Theory Development in Public Administration。Public Administration Review，52(4)，363-373。  new window
3.Denhardt, R. B.(1981)。Toward a critical theory of public organization。Public Administration Review，41(6)，628-635。  new window
4.Hummel, R. P.(1991)。Stories managers tell: why they are as valid as science。Public Administration Review，51(1)，31-41。  new window
5.White, J. D.(1986)。On the Growth of Knowledge in Public Administration。Public Administration Review，46(1)，15-24。  new window
6.Houston, D. J.、Delevan, S. M.(1990)。Public Administration Research: An Assessment of Journal Publication。Public Administration Review，50(6)，649-651。  new window
7.Kelly, M.、Maynard-Moody, S.(1993)。Policy Analysis in the Post-Positivist Era: Engaging Stakeholders in Evaluating the Economic Development Districts Program。Public Administration Review，53(2)，135-142。  new window
8.Stallings, R. A.、Ferris, J. M.(1988)。Public Administration Research: Work in PAR, 1940-1984。Public Administration Review，48(1)，580-587。  new window
9.Newcomer,K. E.、沈清松(19930600)。質的方法對量的方法:論辯或交談。國立政治大學研究通訊，1，19-32。  延伸查詢new window
10.Adams, G. B.、White, J. D.(1994)。Dissertation Research in Public Administration and Cognate Field: An Assessment of Methods and Quality。Public Administration Review，54(6)，565-576。  new window
11.Bailey, M. T.(1992)。Do Physicists Use Case Studies? Thoughts on Public Administration Research。Public Administration Review，52(1)，47-54。  new window
12.Box, R. C.(1992)。An Examination of Debate Over Research in Public Administration。Public Administration Review，52(1)，62-69。  new window
13.Catron, B. L.、Harmon, M. M.(1981)。Action Theory in Practice: Toward Theory Without Conspiracy。Public Administration Review，41(5)，535-541。  new window
14.Cleary, R. E.(1992)。Revisiting the Doctoral Dissertation in Public Administration: An Examination of the Dissertations of 1990。Public Administration Review，52(1)，55-61。  new window
15.Cleveland, Harlan(1988)。Theses of a New Reformation: The Social Fallout of Science 300 Years After Newton。Public Administration Review，46(3)，681-686。  new window
16.Denhardt, R. B.、Denhardt, K. G.(1979)。Public Administration and the Critique of Domination。Administration and Society，11(6)，107-120。  new window
17.McCurdy, Howard E.、Cleary, Robert E.(1984)。Why Can't We Resolve the Research Issue in Public Administration?。Public Administration Review，44(1)，49-55。  new window
18.McCurdy, H. E.、Cleary, R. E.(1984)。A Call for 'Appropriate Methods'。Public Administration Review，44(6)，553-554。  new window
19.Stallings, R. A.(1986)。Doctoral Programs in Public Administration: An Outsider's Perspective。Public Administration Review，46(2)，235-240。  new window
20.Thayer, F. C.(1984)。Understanding Research。Public Administration Review，44(6)，553。  new window
21.Perry, James L.、Kraemer, Kenneth L.(1986)。Research Methodology in the "Public Administration Review," 1975-1984。Public Administration Review，46(3)，215-226。  new window
22.江明修(19920300)。社會科學多重典範的爭辯：試論質與量研究方法的整合。國立政治大學學報，64，315-344。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rorty, Richard(1991)。Objectivity, relativism, and truth。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Bernstein, Richard J.(1976)。The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory。New York：Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.。  new window
3.Morgan, G.(1983)。Beyond method: strategies for social research。Beverly Hills, CA：Sage。  new window
4.Kuhn, Thomas(1972)。The Structure of Scientific Revolution。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.Popper, Karl R.(1968)。The Logic of Scientific Discovery。New York：Basic Books。  new window
6.Glaser, Barney G.、Strauss, Anselm L.(1967)。Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research。Chicago, IL：Aldine。  new window
7.Caiden, Gerald E.(1982)。Public Administration。Pacific Palisades, California：Palisades Publishers。  new window
8.Waldo, Dwight(1955)。The Study of Public Administration。New York：Doubleday。  new window
9.Geertz, Clifford(1973)。The Interpretation of Cultures。Basic Books。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kirkhart, L.(1971)。Public Administration and Selected Development in Social Science。Toward a New Public Administration。NY：Chandler Publishing。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：856（臺灣：843，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2071125 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67881935
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上