資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.226.94.80)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
製造科技制約組織結構對管理風格效用的影響
書刊名:
交大管理學報
作者:
李經遠
作者(外文):
Lee, Gin-yuan
出版日期:
1996
卷期:
16:1
頁次:
頁137-159
主題關鍵詞:
製造科技
;
組織結構
;
管理風格
;
績效
;
Organization structure
;
Technology
;
Management style
;
Performance
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:
1
點閱:22
企業使用製造科技自動化程度的高低,其制約組織結構對管理風格效用的影響,在我國目前的環境下實際究竟如何?這是本研究的核心問題。本研究的具體作法是,對臺北縣市地區製造業以隨機抽樣樂特意選擇並用,決定192家至少橫三十二種產業之工廠為樣本,就彼等之製造科技、組織結構、管理風格、與組織績麥進行問卷調查與面訪,並就取得之資料進行相關分析、符制迴歸分析、及F和f檢定,因而取得如下之主要實證結論:就臺灣製造業組織言:1.若使用高度自動化之製造科技,且本身為有機結通,則增加高階管理之興業取向,將正面影響其績效;反之若為機械結構,則增加高階管理興業取向,將負面影響其績效。以上關係在使用之製造科技為低自動化時將不成立。2.若使用高度自動之製造科技,其組織結構與管理風格適配者(即有機結構配興業管理風格,機械結構配保守管理風格),其績效優於不適配者(即有機結構配保守管理風格,機械結構配興業管理風格)。以上關係在使用之製造科技為低自動化時將不成立。
以文找文
How will manufacturing technology condition the influence of organization structure on the utility of a management style under current environment? It is the major problem this research would solve. Our concrete approach to conduct the research is taking 192 plants across at least 32 different industries in Taipei area as sample, and doing survey on it for collecting data of organization structure, size, technology, management style and performance. After conducting correlation analysis, moderated regression analysis, and F and t tests, the major conclusions drawn from those data are as follows: 1.In the organically structured firms, if manufacturing technology is highly automatic, increases in top management’s entrepreneurial orientation will positively influence performance; in mechanistically-structured firms, increases in top management’s entrepreneurial orientation will negatively influence performance. The foregone relation will not be valid if manufacturing technology is not highly automatic, 2.Under highly automatic manufacturing technology, firms in which the organization structure is congruent with the management style (i.e. organic-entrepreneurial or mechanistic-conservative firms) will perform significantly better than firms in which these variables are incongruent (i.e. organic-conservative or mechanistic-entrepreneurial firms). The foregone relation will nto be valid if the manufacturing technology is not highly automatic.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Sharma, Subhash、Durand, Richard M.、Gur-Arie, Oded(1981)。Identification and analysis of moderator variables。Journal of Marketing Research,18(3),291-300。
2.
Schoonhoven, C. B.(1981)。Problems with Contingency Theory: Testing Assumptions Hidden within the Language of Contingency "Theory"。Administrative Science Quarterly,26(3),349-377。
3.
Covin, J. G.、Slevin, D. P.(1988)。The Influence of Organization Structure on the Utility of an Entrepreneurial Top Management Style。Journal of Management Studies,25(3),217-234。
4.
Miller, Danny、Friesen, Peter H.(1983)。Strategy-Making and Environment: The Third Link。Strategic Management Journal,4(3),221-235。
5.
Arnold, H. J.(1982)。Moderator Variables: A Classification of Conceptual, Analytic, and Psychometric Issues。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,29,143-174。
6.
Gupta, A. K.、Gorindarajan, V.(1982)。An Empirical Examination of Linkages between Strategy Managerial Characteristics and Performance。Academy of Management Proceedings,8(1),31-35。
7.
Keller, R. T.(198904)。A Test of the Path-Goal Theory of Leaderships with Need for Clarity as a Moderator in Research and Development Organizations。Journal of Applied Psychology,208-212。
8.
Rosseau, D. H.(1979)。Assessment of Technology in Organizations: Closed versus Open System Approaches。Academy of Management Review,4,531-542。
9.
Nowlin, W. A.(1990)。Restructuring in Manufacturing: Management Work, and Labor Relations。Industrial Management,32(6),5-9。
10.
李經遠(19940600)。科技與組織結構對高階興業管理風格效用之影響。交大管理學報,14(1),37-61。
延伸查詢
11.
Geller, A. M.(1980)。Matching People to Business Strategies。Financial Executive,48,18-21。
12.
Hickson, D. J.、Pugh, D. S.、Phesey, D. C.(1969)。Operational Technology and Organizational Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal。Administrative Science Quarterly,14(3),378-397。
13.
Oldhan, G. R.、Hackman, J. R.(1981)。Relationships between Organizational Structure And Employee Reations :Comparing Alternative Frameworks。Administrative Science Quarterly,66-83。
14.
Pearce, J. A. II、David, F. R.(1983)。A Social Network Approach to Organizational Design and Performance。Academy of Management Review,8,436-444。
15.
Port, Otis(1992)。Moving Past the Assembly Line。Business Week,1992(Nov.),177-180。
16.
Sheridan, John H.(1992)。The CIM Evolution。Industry Week,29-51。
17.
Mills, Peter K.、Moberg, Dennis J.(1982)。Perspectives on the Technology of Service Organizations。Academy of Management Review,7(3),467-478。
18.
Miller, Danny、Friesen, Peter H.(1982)。Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum。Strategic Management Journal,3(1),1-25。
19.
House, Robert J.(1971)。A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness。Administrative Science Quarterly,16(3),321-339。
20.
Dess, Gregory G.、Robinson, Richard B. Jr.(1984)。Measuring Organizational performance in the Absence of Objefctive Measures: The Case of the Privately-held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit。Strategic Management Journal,5(3),265-273。
會議論文
1.
李誠(1979)。台灣地區勞動市場功能的實證研究。台灣人力資源會議。台北:中央研究院經濟研究所。
延伸查詢
研究報告
1.
李經遠(1993)。組織結構對高階管理風格效用之影響 (計畫編號:NSC81-0301-H-009-508)。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Khandwalla, P. N.(1977)。The Design of Organizations。New York, NY:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich。
2.
Pinchot, G.(1985)。Intrapreneuring。New York:Harper & Row。
3.
Perrow, Charles(1970)。Organizational Analysis: A Sociological Approach。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth。
4.
Winn, Paul R.、Johnson, Ross H.(1978)。Business Statistics。New York:Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.。
5.
Drucker, Peter Ferdinand(1985)。Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles。New York:Harper Business。
6.
Fox, Alan(1974)。Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations。London:Farber and Farber。
7.
Thompson, James D.(1967)。Organization In Action。McGraw-Hill Book Co.。
8.
Amber, George S.、Amber, Paul S.(1969)。Anatomy of Automation。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。
9.
Office of Technology Assessment(1984)。Computerized Manufacturing Automation: Employment Education, and the Workplace。U.S. Government Printing Office。
10.
U. S. Government(1983)。The State of Small Business: A Report to the President。Washington, D. C.:U. S. Government Printing Office。
11.
Burns, T.、Stalker, G. M.(1961)。The management of innovation。London:Tavistock。
12.
Burgelman, R. A.、Sayles, L. R.(1986)。Inside Corporate Innovation: Strategy, Structure and Managerial Skills。New York, NY:Free Press。
13.
Fiedler, Fred E.(1967)。A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness。New York:McGraw-Hill。
14.
Woodward, Joan(1965)。Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice。Oxford University Press。
其他
1.
Miller, M. W.(1987)。Starting Over: High-Tech Entrepreneurs Who Have Left Their Old Firms Ponder Next Moves。
圖書論文
1.
Redding, S. G.、Wong, G. Y. Y.(1986)。The Psychology of Chinese Organizational Behavior。The Psychology of the Chinese People。Oxford University Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
Corporate Culture, Organizational Structures, and Management Styles for Taiwanese, American, and Japanese Firms: An Empirical Investigation in Taiwan
2.
服務科技節制組織結構影響興業管理風格績效之作用
3.
規模制約組織結構對管理風格效用的影響
4.
科技與組織結構對高階興業管理風格效用之影響
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code