:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:設限依變數計量模型之設定與選擇--臺灣電子電器業R&D模型之應用
書刊名:經濟論文叢刊
作者:林惠玲 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Hui-lin
出版日期:1997
卷期:25:1
頁次:頁73-94
主題關鍵詞:調整的Tobit模型兩部門模型Tobit模型R&D模型Adjusted tobit modelTwo-part modelTobit modelR&D model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:47
     本文考慮設限資料的四種迴歸模型,並探討模型設定的涵義 (條件),模型的估 計方法,模型的比較與選擇方法。 我們採用預測能力的準則如平均平方誤差( MSE )及平 均絕對誤差( MAE ),並考慮 Leung and Yu (1996) 的觀點來選擇模型。並以臺灣電子電 器業 R&D 資料進行實證應用與分析。 本文的主要結論分為二部份,一為計量模型之選擇, 結論為雙元方程式較單元方程式為佳, 而雙元方程式又以調正的 Tobit 模型較佳。 二為 R&D 模型之實證結果, 主要結論指出 R&D 密度受到廠商規模、集中度、外銷比重等因素的 影響,且驗證熊彼得的理論:「寡佔市場的廠商較具 R&D 活動的能力。」
     In this paper we consider four models for censored data and discuss model specification, estimation, comparison, and selection. In particular, we adopt MSE and MAE together with the method of Leung and Yu (1996) to select a proper model. These models are then used to analyze Taiwan R&D data. The main findings of the study are separated into two parts. The first part is about model selection. The empirical results show that the adjusted Tobit model are superior to the other three models. The second part concerns the determinants of R&D intensity. The main conclusions are that R&D activities are affected by firm size, concentration, and exports. Meanwhile, the empirical results confirm Schumpter's hypothesis, "Monopoly firms have high R&D intensity."
期刊論文
1.Cohen, Wesley M.、Levin, R. C.、Mowery, D. C.(1987)。Firm Size and R&D Intensity: A Reexamination。Journal of Industrial Economics,35(4),543-565。  new window
2.Amemiya, T.(1984)。Tobit Models: A Survey。Journal of Econometrics,24(1/2),3-61。  new window
3.Tobin, J.(1958)。Estimation of Relationship For Limited Dependent Variable。Econometrica,26(1),24-36。  new window
4.Manning, Willard G.、Newhouse, Joseph P.、Duan, Naihua、Keeler, Emmett B.、Leibowitz, Arleen、Marquis, M. S.(1987)。Health Insurance and the Demand for Medical Care: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment。American Economic Review,77(3),251-277。  new window
5.Leung, S. F.、Yu, S.(1996)。On the choice between sample selection and two-part models。Journal of Econometrics,72(1/2),197-229。  new window
6.Manning, W. G.、Duan, N.、Rogers, W. H.(1987)。Monte Carlo evidence on the choice between sample selection and two-part models。Journal of Econometrics,35(1),59-82。  new window
7.Heckman, James J.(1976)。The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models。Annals of Economic and Social Measurement,5(4),475-492。  new window
8.Duan, Naihua、Manning, Willard G.、Morris, Carl N.、Newhouse, Joseph P.(1983)。A Comparison of Alternative Models for the Demand for Medical Care。Journal of Business & Economic Statistics,1(2),115-126。  new window
9.Cox, D. R.(1962)。Further Results on Test of Separate Families of Hypothesis。Journal of Royal Statistical Society, ser. B,24(2),406-424。  new window
10.Duan, N.、Manning, Willard G., Jr.、Morris, C. N.、Newhouse, J. P.(1985)。Comments on Selectivity Bias。Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research,6,19-24。  new window
11.Hay, J. W.、Olsen, R. J.(1984)。Let Them Eat Cake: A Note on Comparing Alternative Models of the Demand for Health Care。Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,2,279-282。  new window
12.Hay, J. W.、Leu, R.、Rohrer, P.(1987)。Ordinary Least Squares and Sample-Selection Models of Health-care Demand。Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,5,499-506。  new window
13.MacKinnon, J.、White, H.、Davidson, R.(1983)。Test for model Specification in the Presence of Alternative Hypotheses: Some Further Results。Journal of Econometrics,21,53-70。  new window
14.Duan, N.、Manning, Willard G., Jr.、Morris, C. N.、Newhouse, J. P.(1984)。Choosing between the Sample-Selection Model and the Multi-Part Model。Journal of Business & Economic Statistics,2(3),283-289。  new window
會議論文
1.劉錦添、鄭嘉珮(1991)。台灣地區國資廠商研究發展支出的分析。中國經濟學會1991年年會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cox, D. R.(1961)。Tests of Separate Families of Hypotheses。The Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability。Berkeley:University of California Press。105-123。  new window
研究報告
1.Hsiao, C.、Kim, C.、Taylor, G.(1989)。A Statistical Perspective on Insurance Rate-Making。  new window
圖書
1.Amemiya, Takeshi(1985)。Advanced Econometrics。Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Greene, William H.(1993)。Econometric Analysis。Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
3.Schumpeter, J. A.(1954)。History of Economic Analysis。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Maddala, G. S.(1983)。Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Manning, W. G.、Morris, C. N.、Newhouse, J. P.(1981)。A Two-part Model of the Demand for Medical Care: Preliminary Results from the Health Insurance Experiment。Healths, Economics and Health Economics。Amsterdam:North Holland。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE