資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.222.100.212)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Cooperation and Conflict: The Offense-Defense Balance in Cross-Strait Relations
書刊名:
Issues & Studies
作者:
Yuan, I
出版日期:
1997
卷期:
33:2
頁次:
頁1-20
主題關鍵詞:
Cooperative security
;
Cross-strait relations
;
Multilateralism
;
Offensedefense balance
;
Security dilemma
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(
1
) 專書論文(
1
)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:
2
點閱:15
With political relations between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait in transition, the possible consequences of Taiwan's strategies toward mainland China warrant special attention. This article focuses on Taiwan's relations with mainland China under the rubric of cooperative security and their implications for the offense-defense balance of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. Particular attention will be given to efforts to prevent cross-Strait conflict as suggested by the neoliberal school of thought, i.e., cooperative security measures such as the creation of the Council for Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific (CSCAP); and the neorealist approach, i.e., ameliorating the security dilemma by incorporating Taiwan in the Theater Missile Defense (TMD) system as proposed by the U.S. Republican Party (GOP). This article throws new light on these issues and raises questions about the utility of these approaches.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Hildreth, Steven A.、Ellis, Jason D.(1996)。Allied Support for Theater Missile Defense。Orbis,40(1),101-121。
2.
Glaser, Charles L.(1992)。Political Consequences of Military Strategy: Expanding and Refining the Spiral and Deterrence Models。World Politics,44(4),497-538。
3.
Krepon, Michael(199501)。Are Missile Defense MAD?。Foreign Affairs,74(1),19-24。
4.
Jervis, Robert(1982)。Security Regimes。International Organization,36(2),357-378。
5.
Yuan, I.(199606)。Multilateralism and Cooperation under the Security Dilemma: International Relations Theories and U.S.-PRC Relations。Issues & Studies,35(6),1-18。
6.
Forsberg, Randall(199211)。Creating a Cooperative Security System。Boston Review,17(6),1-3。
7.
U.S. State Department(19961108)。Fact Sheet: Major Accomplishments in the Asia-Pacific Region。EPF,504,1-2。
8.
Ball, Desmond(1994)。A New Era in Confidence-Building: The Second Track Process in Asia/Pacific Region。Security Dialogue,25(2),164。
9.
Fisher, Richard D. Jr.(199603)。China's Threats to Taiwan Challenge U.S. Leadership in Asia。Heritage Foundation Asian Studies Center,139,3-9。
10.
Dole, Robert(19960509)。U. S. Must Reassert Its Unique Role in Asia。USIA Wireless File, EPF,305,1-16。
11.
Garrett, Baiming、Glaser, Bonnie(199406)。Multilateral Strategy in the Asia-Pacific Region and Its Impact on Chinese Interests。Contemporary Southeast Asia,16(1),14-34。
12.
Best, Melvin、Bracken, Jerome(1995)。First-Strike Stability in a Multipolar World。Management Science,41(2),298-321。
13.
Cooper, Henry F.(1996)。To Build an Affordable Shield。Orbis,41(1),85-99。
14.
Weldon, Curt(1996)。Why We Must Act at Once。Orbis,41(1),63-69。
15.
Clark, Mark T.(1996)。Arms Control is Not Enough。Orbis,41(1),71-84。
16.
Graver, John W.(198611)。China's Response to the Strategic Defense Initiative。Asian Survey,26(11),1237。
17.
Glaser, Bonnie S.、Garrett, Banning N.(198603)。Chinese Perspectives on the Strategic Defense Initiative。Problems of Communism,35(2),29-41。
18.
Fisher, Richard D. Jr.(19951024)。Building a More Secure Asia Through Missile Defense。Backgrounder,138,1-15。
19.
Powell, Robert(1994)。Anarchy in International Relations Theory: the Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate。International Organization,48(2),313-344。
20.
Evans, Gareth(1994)。Cooperative Security and Intrastate Conflict。Foreign Policy,96,7-15。
21.
Keohane, Robert O.、Martin, Lisa L.(1995)。The Promise of Institutionalist Theory。International Security,20(1),39-51。
22.
Mearsheimer, John J.(1994)。The False Promise of International Institutions。International Security,19(3),5-49。
23.
Yuan, I(19950200)。Cooperation under Anarchy?--Paradoxes of the Intra-Chinese Rapprochement。Issues & Studies,31(2),54-66。
圖書
1.
Amett, Eric(1996)。Nuclear Weapons After the Comprehensive Test Ban。New York。
2.
Valencia, Mark J.(1996)。A Maritime Regime for North-East Asia。Hong Kong:Oxford University Press。
3.
Gompert, David C.(1977)。Nuclear Weapons and World Politics。New York:McGraw-Hill。
4.
Rittberger, Volker(1993)。Regime Theory and International Relations。Clarendon Press。
5.
Brenner, Michael(1995)。Multilateralism and Western Strategy。New York:St. Martin's Press。
6.
(1992)。Guidelines for National Unification。Taipei:Mainland Affairs Council。
7.
Buzan, Barry(1987)。An Introduction to Strategic Studies。New York:St. Martin's Press。
8.
Goldfischer, David(1993)。The Best Defense: Policy Alternatives for U.S. Nuclear Security from the 1950s to the 1990s。Ithaca:Cornell University Press。
9.
Carter, Ashton B.、Perry, William J.、Steinbruner, John D.(1992)。A New Concept of Cooperative Security。Washington, D.C.:Brookings Institutions。
10.
Clawson, Patrick(1996)。Strategic Assessment 1996: Elements of U. S. Power。Washington, D. C.:National Defense University。
11.
Zartman, I. William、Kremenyuk, Victor A.(1995)。Cooperative Security: Reducing Third World Wars。Syracuse, N.Y.:Syracuse University Press。
12.
Paul, T. V.(1994)。Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation by Weaker Power。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
13.
Denoon, David B. H.(1995)。Ballistic Missile Defense in the Post-Cold War Era。Boulder, Colo.:Westview Press。
14.
Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. Jr.(1996)。Security, Strategy, and Missile Defense。McLean, Va.:Brassey's。
15.
Kaplan, Morton A.(1967)。System and Process in International Politics。New York:John Wiley & Sons Inc。
16.
Baldwin, David A.(1993)。Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate。Columbia University Press。
17.
Jervis, Robert(1976)。Perception and Misperception in International Politics。Princeton University Press。
其他
1.
Yuan, I.(19960920)。An U.S.-ROC Joint Evaluation of the TMD System,Taipei。
2.
(19951117)。Chinese Renounce Big Nuclear Power。
3.
(19950218)。China Complained About U.S. TMD Plans。
4.
(19961021)。People's Daily,http://www.snweb.com/gb/people_daily/1996/10/21/fl021.003。
5.
(19960730)。People's Daily,http://www.snweb.com/gb/people_daily/1996/07/30/a0730.001。
6.
(19961106)。People's Daily,http://www.snweb.com/gb/peopIe_daily/1996/11/06/d1106.007。
7.
(19960715)。Peopled Daily,http://www.snweb.com/gb/people_daily/1996/07/15/f0715.009。
圖書論文
1.
Martin, Lisa L.(1993)。The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism。Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form。New York:Columbia University Press。
2.
International Institute for Strategic Studies(1996)。The Slow Progress of Multilateralism in Asia。Strategic Survey 1995-1996。London:Oxford University Press。
3.
Van Evera, Stephen。Offense vs. Defense and the Security Dilemma。Causes of War: The Structure of Power and the Roots of War。Ithaca, N.Y.:Cornell University Press。
4.
Jervis, Robert(1988)。Cooperation under the Security Dilemma。The Use of Force, 3rd edition。Lanham, Md.:University Press of America。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
從國際關係理論探討解決兩岸困境之道
2.
兩岸關係的理論詮釋
3.
多邊主義與安全困境下之合作:國際關係理論與美「中」關係
4.
Cooperation under Anarchy?--Paradoxes of the Intra-Chinese Rapprochement
無相關博士論文
1.
歐盟臺灣中國三邊關係剖析
2.
[中共的涉台決策與兩岸關係發展]結論
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code