:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:吸菸預防教育介入研究
書刊名:中華公共衛生雜誌
作者:高雅珠晏涵文
作者(外文):Kao, Ya-chuYen, Han-wen
出版日期:1997
卷期:16:2
頁次:頁160-169
主題關鍵詞:預防吸菸教育教學介入拒絕技術Smoking prevention educationInterventionRefusing skill
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:11
     本研究探討「預防吸菸教育計畫」是否能促使國二學生有正確的菸害知識、不吸 菸的態度、減低吸菸意向及增強拒絕同儕邀約吸菸的自我效能。本研究採「不相等實驗組控 制組設計」, 以華江中學國二自願就學班學生為對象,並以大理國中自願就學班為校外對 照組以處理校內實驗污染的情形。實驗組接受五小時的預防吸菸教學活動,在教學介入前, 所有學生接受前測以作為評量實驗結果的比較基礎,教學結束後一星期內進行後測以了解教 學後的立即效果;間隔十二週再實施後後測以追蹤教學介入的延宕效果。資料以單因子共變 數分析進行考驗,所得結果在菸害認知、不吸菸意向及拒絕同儕壓力的自我效能方面均有持 續而正向的影響。由學生的回饋得知,學生較喜歡以學生為中心的教學方法,學生較喜歡且 認為最有幫助的課程內容是「拒絕技術的演練」、「建立積極的自我對話」及「擁有各種不 同調適心情的方法」。(中華衛誌 1997;16(2):160-169)
     The main purpose of this study was to explore the effect of a smoking prevention program for the second grade junior high school students. The topic of the research was focused on increasing smoking knowledge, promoting no-smoking attitude, reducing smoking intention and enhancing self-efficacy for refusing smoking pressure from peers. A non-equivalent control group design was employed in this study. Two classes of students in Hua-Chiang Junior High School were given with five sessions of smoking prevention curricula as the treatment group. Students of the four classes in Hua-Chiang and Ta-Li Junior High School were served as the control conditions. The effect of intervention was assessed by questionnaires immediately after five sessions of curricula and in the next three months. The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of covariance. Some interesting results are shown as the following: 1.The program can increase students' smoking knowledge and the intervention effect still retains through the next three months. 2.The program has no significant effect in changing students'no-smoking attitude.3.The intervention doesn't affect the no-smoking intention of the treatment group immediately. However, its effectiveness gets higher significance than the control groups in the follow-up period. 4.There is significant effect in improving the self-efficacy of treatment group in refusing peer's pressure. 5.Students participating in the instructional activities of smoking prevention appreciat-ed the student-centered instruction.(Chin J Public Health. (Taipei):1997;16(2):160-169)
期刊論文
1.Glynn, T. J.(1989)。Essential elements of school-based smoking prevention programs。J Sch Health,59,181-188。  new window
2.Meier, K. S.(1991)。Tobacco Truths : The impact of role model on children's attitude toward smoking。Health Educ Q,18,173-182。  new window
3.李景美(1990)。台北市國民中學三年級學生男生吸藤行為之情境因素及相關家庭狀況因素分析研究。學校衛生,17,38-47。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃松元(1991)。台灣地區青少年吸菸行為調察研究。衛生教育論文集刊,5,45-66。  延伸查詢new window
5.Botvin, G. J.、Eng, A.、Williamx, C. L.(1980)。Preventing the onset of cigarette smoking through life skills training。Prev Med,9,135-143。  new window
6.Perry, C.、Killin, J.、Telch, M.、Slinkard, L. A.、Danaher, B. G.(1980)。Modifying smoking behavior of teenagers: a school-based intervention。Am J Public Health,70,722-725。  new window
7.Botvin, G. J.、Dusenbury, L.、Baker, E.、James-Ortix, S.、Dirner, J.(1989)。A skills training approach to smoking prevention among Hispanic youth。J Behav Med,12,279-295。  new window
8.Burk, T. A.、Naughton, M. J.、Becher, S. L.、Arbo-gast, R.、Lauer, R. M.、Krohn, M. D.(1987)。The short­-term effect of competition and reward in an adolescent smoking prevention program。Health Educ Q,14,141-152。  new window
9.Botvin, G. J.、Dusenbury, L.、Baker, E.、James-Ortix, S.、Botvin, E. M.、Kerner, J.(1992)。Smoking prevention among urban minority youth: assessing effect on outcome and mediating variables。Health Psychol,11,290-299。  new window
10.Clarke, J. H.、Macphersonm, B.、Holmes, D. R.、Jones, R.(1986)。Reducing adolescent smoking: A comparison of peer-led, teacher-led, and expert intervention。J Sch Health,56,102-106。  new window
11.Jason, L. A.、Mollica, M.、Ferrone, L.(1982)。Evaluating an early secondary smoking prevention intervention。Prev Med,11,96-102。  new window
12.Flay, B. R.、Ryan, K. B.、Best, J. A.(1985)。Are social-psychological smoking prevention program effective? the Waterloo study。J Behav Med,8,37-57。  new window
13.Hansen, W. B.、Malotte, C. K.、Fielding, J. E.(1988)。Evaluation of a tobacco and alcohol abuse prevention curriculum for adolescent。Health Educ Q,15,93-114。  new window
14.Best, J. A.、Thomson, J.、Santi, S. M.、Smith, E. A.、Brown, D. S.(1988)。Preventing cigarette smoking among school children。Ann Rev Public Health,9,161-201。  new window
15.Hurd, P. D.、Johnson, A.、Pechacek, T.、Best, L. P.、Jacovs, D. R.、Luepder, R. V.(1980)。Prevention of cigarette smoking in seventh grade students。J Behav Med,3,15-28。  new window
學位論文
1.陳錫奇(1985)。從態度與主觀規範的因素探討過國中生之抽菸意向(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃淑貞(1980)。國中生開始抽煙之誘因及其仿效對象之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Coe, R. M.、Crouse, E.、Cohen, J. D.、Fisher, E. B.(1982)。Patterns of change in adolescent smoking-behavior and results of a one year follow-up of a smoking prevention program。J Sch Health。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE