:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論戰國四公子養士態度與門客回報
書刊名:臺中師院學報
作者:魏聰祺 引用關係
作者(外文):Wei, Tsung-chi
出版日期:1997
卷期:11
頁次:頁269-289
主題關鍵詞:戰國養士齊國孟嘗君趙國平原君魏國信陵君楚國春申君
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:123
     齊國孟嘗君、趙國平原君、魏國信陵君及楚國春申君,此四人稱為戰國四公子, 他們有一共同特色,即是好客喜士,而且門下食客皆至三千。「養兵千日,用在一朝」,這 是養士的目的,而為了使門士賓客願意歸附,且犧牲回報,則有賴主人以國士待之,因此由 養士態度與門客回報兩方面來比較,即可判斷出戰國四公子之優劣。本文依上述兩方面加以 評論,認為四人優劣順序為信陵君、平原君、孟嘗君、春申君。
     MENG-CHANG CHUN in Chi, PING-YUAN CHUN in Chao, HSIN-LING CHUN in Wei, and CHUN-SHEN CHUN in Chu, are called THE FOUR GENTLEMEN IN WARRING STATES. One of their common characteristics was that they all were hospitable and fond of scholars. Besides, there were hangers-on for them all each up to three thousand in their residences. "Maintain an army for a thousand days to use it in the moment of truth." This is the purpose of raising the scholars. Whether these scholar guests, liked to follow them and even repay them as being a sacrifice or not, depended on how their masters treated them as an offical scholar. Therefore, comparison between the two ways, the attitude of raising scholars and the dependent-advisors' repayment can conclude the good or the bad for the four gentlement. The comment is hereby made in the two aspects mentioned above and concludes that the good or the bad for the four gentlement in order which are Hsin-ling chun, Ping-yuan chum, Meng-changchun, and Chun-shen chun.
圖書
1.司馬遷、裴駰、司馬貞、張守節、瀧川龜太郎(1972)。史記會注考證。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱自清。讀法指導大概。史記菁華錄。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.范文芳。把握主題。司馬遷的創作意識與寫作技巧。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.史記評林。  延伸查詢new window
2.(西漢)司馬遷。史記。  延伸查詢new window
3.(唐)司馬貞。索隱。  延伸查詢new window
4.戰國策。  延伸查詢new window
5.(清)劉熙載。藝概,北京。  延伸查詢new window
6.(宋)裴駰。集解。  延伸查詢new window
7.禮記。  延伸查詢new window
8.國語。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE