資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.225.98.177)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
理性預算的運用與限制
書刊名:
中國行政評論
作者:
余致力
/
陳立剛
作者(外文):
Yu, Chilik
/
Chen, Li-khan
出版日期:
1997
卷期:
6:4
頁次:
頁69-86
主題關鍵詞:
Public budgeting
;
Rational budgeting
;
Budget reform
;
Decision-making model
;
政府預算
;
理性預算
;
預算改革
;
決策模型
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
5
) 博士論文(0) 專書(
2
) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
4
共同引用:0
點閱:36
本文旨在介紹理性預算在美國的建制過程與運用成效。理性預算決策理論是預算 學界十分重要的一個規範性理論,主張政府在預算決策過程中,應該透過按部就班的思維計 算,考慮各施政計畫之效能與效率,以作出理性的抉擇,對有限資源做最有效的配置。此一 規範性理論主導了美國近五十年來的預算改革。然而,諸多實證研究發現,這些改革成效不 盡理想,理性預算的運用十分有限,這樣的實證結果,對Lindbloom、Wildavsky,Allison, Weiss,Anton,Scharkansky等學者及其追隨者而言,並不意外。本文最後便引介這些學者 所建構的決策模型或預算理論,如漸進決策模型、組織程序模型、官僚政治模型、I-I-I決 策模型、及角色理論,俾有助吾人洞察真實世界中的決策與預算行為,瞭解理性預算在制度 面與行為面的一些限制,為日後提供預算興革建言,提供一些思考的方向與立論的依據。
以文找文
The purpose of this paper is to introduce the institutionalization and utilization of rational budgeting in the U.S. The requirement that resource allocation decisions be supported by program effectiveness and efficiency through deliberative and sequential calculation is probably the most important normative theory in the field of public budgeting. This normative theory has driven various budgetary reforms during the past five decades. Empirical assessment of these reforms, however, has generally been negative. To a number of scholars, such as Lindbloom, Wildavsky, Allison, Weiss, Anton, Scharkansky and their followers, the limited utilization of rational budgeting is not surprising. They have proposed various decision-making models and budgeting theories, such as incrementalism, the organizational process model, the bureaucratic politics model, the I-I-I model, and role theory, to compete with rational budgeting theory in describing and explaining what happens in reality. The last part of this paper elaborates these models and theories to provide us with some directions of deliberation and foundations of argument in the future while making budgetary reform proposals in Taiwan.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Abney, G.、Lauth, T. P.(1993)。Determinants of State Agency Budget Success。Public Budgeting and Financial Management,5(1),37-65。
2.
Anton, T. J.(1967)。Roles and Symbols in the Determination of State-Expenditures。Midwest Journal of Political Science,11(1),27-43。
3.
Botner, S. B.(1985)。The Use of Budget/Management Tools by State Governments。Public Administration Review,45(5),616-620。
4.
Carter, K.(1994)。Performance Budgets: Here By Popular Demand。State Legislatures,20(12),22-25。
5.
Connely, M.、Tompkins, G. L.(1989)。Does Performance Matter? A Study of State Budgeting。Policy Studies Review,8(2),288-299。
6.
Cook, T. J.(1986)。Symposium: Performance Measurement in Public Agencies。Policy Studies Review,6(1),61-170。
7.
Gosling, J. J.(1987)。The State Budget Office and Policy Making。Public Budgeting and Finance,7(1),51-65。
8.
Harkin, J. M.(1982)。Effectiveness Budgeting: The Limits of Budget Reform。Policy Studies Review,2(3),112-126。
9.
Harper, E. L.、Kramer, F. A.、Rouse, A. M.(1969)。Implementation and Use of PPB in Sixteen Federal Agencies。Public Administration Review,29(6),623-632。
10.
Lauth, T. P.(1985)。Performance Evaluation in the Georgia Budgetary Process。Public Budgeting and Finance,5(1),67-82。
11.
Lauth, T. P.(1978)。Zero-Base Budgeting in Georgia State Government: Myth and Reality。Public Administration Review,38(5),420-430。
12.
Lee, R. D. Jr.(1991)。Developing in State Budgeting: Trends of Two Decades。Public Administration Review,51(3),254-262。
13.
Lee, R. D. Jr.(1991)。Educational Characteristics of Budget Office Personnel and State Budgetary Processes。Public Budgeting and Finance,11(3),69-79。
14.
Lindblom, C. E.(1979)。Still Muddling, Not Yet Through。Public Administration Review,39(6),517-526。
15.
Mosher, F. C.(1964)。Limitations and Problems of PPBS in the States。Public Administration Review,29(2),395-405。
16.
Rose, R.(1977)。Implementation and Evaporation: The Record of MBO。Public Administration Review,37(1),64-71。
17.
Rubin, I. S.(1990)。Budget Theory and Budget Practice: How Good the Fit?。Public Administration Review,50(2),179-189。
18.
Schick, A.(1988)。Micro-Budgetary Adaptations to Fiscal Stress in Industrialized Democracies。Public Administration Review,48(1),523-533。
19.
Schick, A.(1986)。Macro-Budgetary Adaptations to Fiscal Stress in Industrialized Democracies。Public Administration Review,46(2),124-134。
20.
Schick, A.(1973)。A Death in the Bureaucracy: The Demise of Federal PPB。Public Administration Review,33(2),146-156。
21.
Schick, A.(1966)。The Road to PPB: The Stages of Budget Reform。Public Administration Review,26(6),234-258。
22.
Sharkansky, I.(1968)。Agency Requests, Gubernatorial Support and Budget Success in State Legislatures。The American Political Science Review,62(4),1220-1231。
23.
Skok, J. E.(1980)。Budgetary Politics and Decision-Making: Development of an Alternative Hypothesis for State Government。Administration and Society,11(4),445-460。
24.
Stevens, J. M.、Lee, R. D. Jr.(1981)。Patterns of Policy Analysis for State Governments: A Contingency and Demand Perspective。Public Administration Review,41(6),636-644。
25.
Thompson, J. A.(1987)。Agency Requests, Gubernatorial Support, and Budget Success in State Legislatures Revisited。The Journal of Politics,49(3),756-779。
26.
Wildavsky, A.(1978)。A Budget for All Seasons? Why the Traditional Budget Lasts。Public Administration Review,38(6),501-509。
27.
Willoughby, K. G.(1993)。Decision Making Orientations of State Government Budget Analysts: Rationalists or Incrementalists?。Public Budgeting and Financial Management,5(1),67-114。
28.
Lindblom, Charles Edward(1959)。The Science of "Muddling Through"。Public Administration Review,19(2),79-88。
會議論文
1.
Grafton, C.、Permaloff, A.(1994)。Analysis in State Budget Formulation。1994 Annual Meeting on the Southern American Political Science Association。Atlanta, Georgia。
學位論文
1.
Willoughby, K. G.(1991)。The Decision-Making Orientations of State Government Budget Analysts: Rational or Intuitive Thinkers?(博士論文)。University of Georgia。
2.
Yu, C.(1996)。The Use of Program Evaluation in Public Budgeting: Evidence from the 1993 Georgia Budget Reform(博士論文)。University of Greorgia。
圖書
1.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations(1985)。The Question of State Government Capability。Washington, D.C.:Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations。
2.
Allison, G. T.(1971)。Esscnce of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis。Boston, MA:Little, Brown and Company。
3.
CBO(1993)。Using Performance Measures in the Federal Budget Process。Washington, D.C.:Congressional Budget Office。
4.
Dryzek, J.(1990)。Discursive Democracy。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
5.
GAO(1993)。Performance Budgeting: State Experiences and Implications for the Federal Government。Washington, D.C.:General Accounting Office。
6.
Kettl, D. F.(1992)。Deficit Politics: Public Budgeting in Institutional and Historical Context。New York, NY:MacMillian Publishing Company。
7.
Lindblom, C. E.(1977)。Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems。New York, NY:Basic Books, Inc.。
8.
Schick, A.(1990)。The Capacity to Budget。Washington D.C.:The Urban Institute。
9.
Schick, A.(1979)。Zero Base '80: The Status of Zero-Base Budgeting in the States。Washington, D.C.:The Urban Institute。
10.
Schick, A.(1971)。Budget Innovation in the States。Washington, D.C.:The Brookings Institution。
11.
Wildavsky, A.(1986)。Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes。New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Books。
12.
Wildavsky, Aaron(1984)。The Politics of the Budgetary Process。Boston, MA:Little, Brown and Company。
圖書論文
1.
Clynch, E. J.(1994)。Changes in Mississippi Budgeting During the Last Decade: A Push Toward Program Budgeting。Case Studies in Public Budgeting and Financial Management。Dubuque. IA:Kendell/Hunt Publishing Company。
2.
Lee, R. D. Jr.(1993)。The Use of Program Information and Analysis in State Budgeting: Trends of Two Decades。Handbook of Comparative Public Budgeting and Financial Management。New York, NY:Marcel Dekker。
3.
Mathiasen, D.(1993)。The Separation of Powers and Political Choice: Budgeting, Auditing, and Evaluation in the United States。Budgeting, Auditing, and Evaluation: Functions and Integration in Seven Governments。New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Publishers。
4.
Weiss, C. H.(1983)。Ideology, Interests, and Information: The Basis of Policy Positions。Ethics, the Social Sciences, and Policy Analysis。New York, NY:Plenum Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
財政壓力下地方政府的預算決策與調適行為之研究
2.
公共策略管理之適當模式--哈佛企業政策、策略聯盟、競爭力分析...還是其他?
3.
政府再造下的預算改革--以九○年代美國各州政府為例
4.
公共策略規劃暨績效預算--從美、澳的執行經驗建立適當之評估架構
5.
因應「公共預算新紀元」之危機
無相關博士論文
1.
公共組織策略規劃之研究 : 理論、執行與評估
2.
政府預算的總體與個體研究
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code