:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運動成績優良學生升學輔導資格研議
書刊名:國立臺灣體育學院學報
作者:林文進
作者(外文):Lin, Wen-jin
出版日期:1997
卷期:2
頁次:頁41-59
主題關鍵詞:運動成績優良學生升學輔導
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:27
     本文以「中等以上學校運動成績優良學生升學輔導辦法」之保送資格內容為主題, 參酌中等學校技能(藝)競賽優勝學生保送甄試升學辦法、高中數理及語文資優保送升學辦法 等內容,闡述運動成績優良學生保送資格的現況與問題。 文中提出現有保送資格所衍生的三個爭議: (一)刪減資賦優異特殊才能的鑑定流程,降低鑑定結果的可信度。 (二)運動員對充實學力與提昇運動技能孰重?難以抉擇。 (三)是否使用智力測驗與性向測驗的困擾。 因應運動成績優良學生輔導升學資格的爭議,筆者試擬五個改進現況的策略: (一)研訂運動性向測驗量表。 (二)建立智力測驗檔案資料。 (三)簡化運動成績類別。 (四)增列嚴謹的甄試流程。 (五)刪除學力與年齡限制。 本文除提出運動成績優良學生輔導升學資格衍生的爭議,與改進策略外。對欠周延的輔 導升學資格,將會影響體育人才的培育,及運動成績優良學生的學習效果,提出誠懇的呼籲。 冀盼爾後輔導升學資格的釐訂與鑑定,能依據特殊教育的理論與法令辦理,以避免主觀的判 斷,造成人才的流失。
     This paper is mainly focused on the recommended qualifications of "Guidance Measures in the School Entrance of Gifted Athletes at the Middle-school Level or Above." Also reviewed were "Recommendations and School Entrance Measures for Gifted Art Students at the Middle School" and "Recommendations and School Entrance Measures for Senior-high Students Outstanding in Math or Language." The present conditions and problems in the recommended qualifications for gifted athletes were also illustrated. Three controversies were brought up in terms of recommended qualifications: 1. Lower appraisal credibility caused by leaving out the appraisal process for special talents 2. Athletes' difficult choice between upgrading academic abilities and upgrading sports skills 3. Problems with current intelligence and aptitude tests In working out these controversies, the author recommended five methods for improving the present condition: 1. Draft a sports aptitude test with precise measurements 2. Establish data on intelligence tests 3. Simplify the category of sports grades 4. List a more strict appraisal process 5. Leave out limitations on educational Level and age In addition to the above-mentioned, this article pointed out the influence of improper school entrance measures on the cultivation and learning performance of athletes. The author hoped that in the future, the drafting and appraisal of recommended qualifications for school entrance will be in accordance with special education theories and regulations and which will be conducive for making a fair judgement and reducing the loss of gifted athletes.
期刊論文
1.雷寅雄(19940900)。運動績優生保送制度之我見。國民體育季刊,23(3)=102,193-195。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊明雄(19850600)。我國運動績優學生升學輔導實施狀況調查研究。國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所集刊,12,245-367。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃金柱(19840600)。影響運動績優保送生訓練意願因素之調查分析。師大學報,29,229-288。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林輝雄(19960600)。運動員選材與診斷方法初探。國立體育學院論叢,6(2),193-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.顏慶祥、湯維玲(1994)。教育百科辭典。台北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部體育司編輯委員會(1990)。體育法規選輯。臺北市:教育部體育司。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(1994)。技術及職業教育法規選輯。教育部技術及職業教育司。  延伸查詢new window
4.中華民國特殊教育協會(1993)。資優學生創造力與特殊才能。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部(1992)。國民體育季刊。教育部體育司。  延伸查詢new window
6.毛連塭(1994)。開創資優教育的新紀元。國立臺灣師大特教系所:中華民國特殊教育協會。  延伸查詢new window
7.林紀東、蔡墩銘、鄭玉波、古登美(1994)。新編六法參照法令判解全書。台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.張春興(1992)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.郭生玉(1989)。心理與教育測驗。台北:精華。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top