:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:STS教學模組開發模式之建立及其實際教學成效評估
書刊名:科學教育學刊
作者:盧玉玲 引用關係連啟瑞 引用關係
作者(外文):Lu, Yu-lingLien, Chi-jui
出版日期:1997
卷期:5:2
頁次:頁219-243
主題關鍵詞:科技與社會國小科學教育法學習成就教學成效Science-societySTSElementary scienceTeaching methodLearning achievementInstitutional effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:31
     本研究旨在建立一種STS教學模組之開發模式,並依模式進行模組開發與實際教學。此外,並設計STS評量工具,發展STS教學模式評量參考,且用以分析及評量模組試驗教學活動成效,以了解STS教學法及模組開發模式是否有效,此可作為未來融入STS教學法於實際教學提供經驗,並作為修正及普遍推廣之參考。本研究共發展三種評量工具,分用以評測學童在對科學態度、創造力、與裀識學習成就等領域之發展情形。研究以透鏡單位模組為主,採前-後測之實驗設計,以學童前測成績為共變數,以後測成績為變數,進行共變數分析;計有二位教師、四十位學童參與本研究。 研究結果發現 1.由國小教師觀點與學童學習成效而言,本研究所建立S(KPL)S模式之STS教學模組開發具可行性。 2.以S(KPL)S模式進行之「透鏡」單元STS教學可發現 (1)有助於提高學生對科學之正面態度; (2)在創造力與科學概念學習成效方面與一般教學方式成效相同。
     The purpose of this study was to create a model for developing STS teaching modules. Based on the model, a practical teaching module is developed. In addition, STS evaluation instruments were designed to evaluate both the development model and the teaching module. Students' learning was examined to see if the development model and the STS teaching method effective. Three kinds of evaluation instruments were developed and used to evaluate the development of students in terms of scientific attitude, creativity, and concept. There were two teachers and forty students who participated in the study. The pre-test scores of students were used as co-variants and the post-test scores were used as the dependent variable in the ANCOVA procedures applied. Several conclusions can be drawn from the results of this study. From the elementary school teachers' viewpoint and students' learning achievement, it appears possible to develop STS teaching modules using the model created in this study. It was also found that the STS approach in the model appeared to enhance students' attitudes toward science. However, in the creativity and concept domains, there were no significant difference between students who experienced the STS approach and those who experienced the conventional approach. Results of the study can be used as a direction for further study on the application and revision of STS teaching methods in practical condition.
期刊論文
1.Simpson, R. D.、Oliver, A. J. S.(1990)。A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students。Science Education,74(1),1-18。  new window
2.McCormack, A. J.、Yager, R. E.(1989)。A new taxonomy of science education。The Science Teacher,56(2),47-48。  new window
3.Kumar, D.(1994)。STS implementation: What does it say?。Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society,14(5/6),284-286。  new window
4.Yager, R. E.、Penick, J. E.(1984)。What students say about science teaching and science teachers。Science Education,68(2),143-152。  new window
5.Yager, R. E.(1995)。Science/Technology/Society and Learning。Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society,15(5/6),225-227。  new window
6.Brant, L. A.(1995)。A Required STS Course at the University of Northern Iowa。Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society,15(5/6),235-240。  new window
7.McComas, W. F.(1988)。Putting STS to the test。Chautauqua Notes,3(8),2-3。  new window
8.Stinner, A.(1995)。Contextual settings, science stories, and large context problems: Toward a more humanistic science education。Science Education,79(5),555-581。  new window
9.Yager, R. E.(1988)。Features which separate least effective from most effective science teachers。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,25(3),165-177。  new window
10.Yager, R. E.(1987)。Assess all five domains of science。The Science Teacher,54(7),33-37。  new window
11.Yager, R. E.(1989)。Development of student creative skills: A quest for successful science education。Creativity Research Journal,2(3),196-203。  new window
12.Yager, R. E.(1989)。The power of a current issue for making school programs more relevant。Social Science Record,26(2),42-43。  new window
13.Yager, R. E.(1989)。Student perceptions of the usefulness of school science experiments。School Science and Mathematics,89(4),313-319。  new window
14.郭重吉(19880600)。從認知觀點探討自然科學的學習。教育學院學報,13,351-379。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.王澄霞、劉奕昇(1994)。開發溫室效應STS單元。第十屆科學教育研討會,37-68。  延伸查詢new window
2.Marker, G. W.(1993)。The diffusion and adoption of STS in the Social studies: some observations。The 73rd Annual Meeting of the National Council for the Social Studies,(會議日期: 1993/11)。Nashville, TN。  new window
3.Dolgos, K. A.(1995)。Integrating the STS Model into the basic education curriculum。Symposium on Science, Technology and Society,(會議日期: 1995/11/02-03)。State College, PA。  new window
4.王澄霞、劉奕昇(1994)。臭氧層破洞STS單元活動:大二學生。第十屆科學教育研討會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Spina, S. U.(1993)。Beyond gender differences: Traditional and alternative cognitive strategies。Annual Meetiing of the American Educational Research Association。Atlanta, GA。  new window
6.Rubba, P. A.、Wiesenmyer, R. L.(1990)。A Study of the qualities teachers recommend in STS issue investigation and action instructional materials。1990 meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching。Atlanta, Ga。  new window
學位論文
1.Myers, L. H.(1988)。Analysis of student outcomes in ninth grade physical science taught with a science-technology-society focus versus one taught with a textbook orientation(博士論文)。The University of Iowa,Iowa City。  new window
2.Iskandar, S. M.(1991)。An evaluation of science-technology-society approach to science teaching(博士論文)。University of Iowa,Iowa City。  new window
3.Lu, Y. L.(1993)。A study of the effectiveness of the science-technology society approach to science teaching in the elementary school(博士論文)。The University of Iowa,Iowa City。  new window
4.Liu, C. T.(1992)。Evaluation the effectiveness of an inservice teacher education program: The Iowa Chautauqua Program(博士論文)。The University of Iowa,Iowa City。  new window
5.Mackinnu, A.(1991)。Comparison of learning outcomes between classes taught with a Science-Technology-Society (STS) Approach and Textbook Orientation(博士論文)。University of Iowa,Iowa City。  new window
圖書
1.Yager, R. E.、Kellerman, L.、Liu, C.、Blunck, S. M.、Veronesi, P. D.(1993)。The Iowa assessment handbook。Iowa City:University of Iowa, Science Education Center。  new window
2.McCormack, W. F.、Yager, R. E.(1989)。The Iowa assessment package for evaluation in five domains of science education。Iowa City, IA:The University of Iowa, Science Education Center。  new window
3.Gagne, F.(1977)。Selecting R&D Products to Meet School Needs。Tallahassee:Washington, DC:National Inst. Of Education (DHEW):Dissemination and Resources Group。  new window
4.Yager, R. E.、Blunck, S. M.、Ajam, M.(1990)。The Iowa assessment package for evaluation in five domains of science education。Iowa City, IA:The University of Iowa, Science Education Center。  new window
5.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Yager, R. E.,Ajeyalemi, D.(1991)。Effects of STS curriculum implementation on student achievement in four domains of science education。  new window
2.Otto, P. B.(1995)。Science Education in the Rural United States. Implications for the Twenty-First Century(ED390649)。  new window
3.Simmons, P. E.,Guy, M. D.(1991)。STS results in more positive student attitudes。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top