:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:康德與超驗方法 (上)
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:蕭宏恩 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsiao, Hung-en
出版日期:1998
卷期:25:7=290
頁次:頁636-651+687
主題關鍵詞:方法先天的先驗的超驗的先驗哲學超驗方法存有絕對的肯定MethodA prioriTranscendentalThe Transcendental philosophyThe transcendental methodBeingAbsoluteAffirmation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:17
     Science,科學或學術,其本質即為「方法」與「系統」;「方法」指的是「形式」的一面,「系統」則指的是「內容」的一面。而科學之為一系統知識,即在於藉由正確的方法而使得科學成為一有條不紊、具備普遍、必然之特性的整體,並有其發展之可能。康德的先驗哲學,即是在知識的批判上,確立科學之所以可能的條件。然而,康德先驗哲學的起點──顯象(appearance)─並無錯誤,只是,顯象要成為「客觀的」,即必須關聯於「絕對」而被限定,即為;客觀顯象。康德卻隔斷了這層關聯,只是藉著一種空洞的概念-理性的理念-來確保判斷的系統完整性。新士林哲學的超驗方法,即是針對康德先驗哲學方法的此一缺憾而做的進一步發展。
     Science is essentially a “method” and a “system”; the “method” refers to “form” and the “system” refers to “content.” Science, by way of correct method, makes itself an orderly whole, with the qualities of generality, necessity, and developmental possibility, which makes science systematic knowledge. Kant's transcendental philosophy lies on the basis of the critique of knowledge, it attempts to establish the conditions in which science is possible. Nothing is wrong with the starting point of Kant's transcendental philosophy-appearance-; it is only that appearance must be in connection with the “absolute” and limited in order to be “objective”, that is to say “objective appearance”. Kant separated this connection through a hollow concept of the “rational idea” in order to ensure the integration of a judgmental system. The Neo-Scholastic transcendental method aims at the deficiencies of Kant's transcendental method in an attempt to further develop it.
圖書
1.Gilson, Étienne、沈清松(1987)。中世紀哲學精神。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
2.伯納德‧德夫考、傅佩榮(1989)。西方哲學(1900-1950)。臺北:業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.McCool, Gerald A.(1992)。From Unity to Pluralism: The Internal Evolution of Thomism。New York:Fordham University Press。  new window
4.Zybura, John S.(1927)。Present-Day Thinkers and the New Scholasticism--An International Symposium。St. Louis:London:B. Herder Book Co.。  new window
5.Brezik, Victor B.(1981)。One Hundred Years of Thomism: Aeterni Patris and Afterwards: A Symposium。Houston:Center for Thomistic Studies, University of St. Thomas。  new window
6.Muck, Otto、Seidensticker, William D.(1968)。The Transcendental Method。New York:Herder and Herder。  new window
7.Gilson, Étienne、Shook, L. K.(1956)。Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas。New York:Random House。  new window
8.孫振青(1984)。康德的批判哲學。台北:黎明出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Brugger, Walter、項退結(1976)。西洋哲學辭典。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
10.Baumgartner, Hans Michael、李明輝(1988)。康德《純粹理性批判》導讀。台北:聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.Zybura, John S.、Cavanaugh, John J., C.S.C.(1927)。Thinkers and the New Scholasticism--an International Symposium。London, W. C.。  new window
12.袁廷棟(1985)。哲學心理學。臺北:輔仁大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.沈清松(1991)。物理之後:形上學的發展。牛頓。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE