本研究之目的主要在探討網球場地之功能測試比較，以提供教練選手對運動表面 功能的了解及對往後建造網球場館場地表面之建議。應用作者自製攜帶式摩擦力測試儀及攜 帶式避震反彈功能測試儀進行網球運動場地表面之功能測試及探討。以五種（混泥土、紅土 、PU、富力克及人工草地）不同的場地（共 11 個球場）為主，發現人工草地材質的摩擦力 及避震能力都較其他材質高，而在反彈能力上則是 PU 材質最高。不過在測試的過程中發現 若是墊上運動鞋後，其結果會有差異，因此影響運動場地表面的因素不只是表面材質，亦要 考慮運動鞋之功能。

　　　　　The purposes of this study are comparing the function between the different tennis surfaces, and providing the understandings and suggestions for coaches, athletes and managers. A new-designed equipment were used to exam the cushioning, energy return and friction abilities for sport surfaces. The results showed the friction and cushioning abilities of the artificial grass was the highest in the five different tennis surfaces (concrete, red sand, PU, Jefco and artificial grass), and the PU had better energy return ability in all material, but if we put the sport shoes on the surfaces, the results would be different. The factors of sport surface was not only the surface materials, but also the function of sport shoes.