本研究的目的在將跑步速度耐力模式，實際應用在實驗室跑步機與田徑場的跑步 運動上，同時進一步探討兩種跑步臨界速度 (critical velocity，簡稱 CV) 與無氧跑步能 力 (anaerobic running capacity，簡稱 ARC) 測驗結果的相關與差異狀況。以經常訓練的 男性跑者 18 名 (年齡 26.50 ± 8.10 歲、 身高 171.44 ± 6.98 公分、 體重 61.08 ± 7.86 公斤、VO �� max 63.92 ± 8.27 ml/min/kg、換氣閾值 49.79 ± 9.20 ml/min /kg) 為對象， 受試者先接受田徑場 800 m、1500 m 與 5000 m 的跑步成績測量，再依跑步距離 與運動成績成正心的的速度耐力模式，計算出受試者的 CV 田徑場與 ARC 田徑場； 然後依 平衡次序的方式，在實驗室跑步機上接受 4.5 至 6.5 m/s 的三個固定速度，讓受試者可以 進行最大持續跑步時間約為 3、5 與 15 分鐘的測驗，再依最大跑步距離與最大持續跑步時 間成正比的速度耐力模式，計算出受試者的 CV 實驗室與 ARC 實驗室。重複量數 t 檢定與 積差相關的分析結果顯示， CV 實驗室 (4.61 ± 0.23m/s) 與 CV 田徑場 (4.54 ± 0.29 m/s ) 沒有顯著差異且顯著相關 (0.90)， 兩種 CV 測驗值與 VO �� max、換氣閾值、V、V 以及 V 的相關 (0.40、0.59、0.63、0.66、 0.89 與 0.49、0.66、0.69、0.74、0.99) 具 有相同的趨勢；ARC 實驗室 (184.08 ± 52.70m) 與 ARC 田徑場 (207.95 ± 40.44 m) 亦 沒有顯著差異， 但是相關僅 0.43( P>.05)，兩種 ARC 測驗值與 VO �� max、換氣閾值、V 、V 以及 V 的相關 (0.00，0.50，0.59， 0.66，.0.34 與 -0.42，-0.48，- 0.25，-0.21 ，-0.40) 則極不一致。 研究結果顯示，實驗室跑步機與田徑場的跑步速度耐力模式測驗， 可以獲得相同的 CV 測驗結果，但是無法獲得一致的ARC。

　　　　　The purposes of this study were to investigate the relationship and difference of two kinds (running on track and treadmill) of running critical velocities (CV) and anaerobic running capacity (ARC) calculated from a running velocity endurance model. Subjects were eighteen male runners (mean age 26.50 ± 8.10 yr, mean height 171.44 ± 6.98 cm, mean weight 61.08 ± 7.86 kg, mean VO �� max 63.92 ± 8.27 ml/min/kg, and mean VT 49.79 ± 9.20 ml/min/kg). At first, the subject completed running tests of 800m, 1500m, and 5000m on truck, and the finished times were assessed for CV and ARC by the velocity endurance model. Three steady velocities between speeds of 4.5 to 6.5 m/s of running in balanced order on the treadmill in the laboratory, and were applied in balance order for the maximum maintainable running time adjusted at about 3, 5 and 15 minutes of duration. The CV and ARC were then calculated from velocity endurance model with the maximum running distance and maximum running time to exhaustion. Repeated t-test and Pearson's product moment correlatiion were applied for the data analysis. There was no significant difference between CV and CV even though significant correlation between these two variables were found. The correlation coefficients of CV (4.61 ± 0.23 m/s) and CV (4.54 ± 0.29) with VO ��, VT, V, V and 5000m were 0.40, 0.59, 0.63, 0.66 and 0.89,and 0.49, 0.66, 0.69, 0.74 and 0.99 respectively. Even if ARC was not significantly different from ARC, no significant correlation (r=0.43, P>.05) was found between these two variables. It is concluded that the running velocity endurance model of the running on the treadmill and the track can obtain the same result of CV, but identical ARC is not achievable.