:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:影響反傾銷稅課徵因素之研究
書刊名:長榮學報
作者:李隆生 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Lung-sheng
出版日期:1998
卷期:2:2
頁次:頁11-21
主題關鍵詞:反傾銷Antidumping
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:12
     從1980年以來,反傾銷制度已逐漸為各國所普遍採用,以對抗國際間之不公平貿易行為;另一方面,進口國政府亦常利用反傾銷法規範的「灰色地帶」以保護國內產業。 本研究利用文獻回顧法探討政治與經濟因素在反傾銷裁定的決策上所扮演的角色,主要結論如下:經濟因素外,影響傾銷認定的重要政治因素歸納有二:利益團體的遊說及輸出國對其貨品遭反傾銷裁定報復的可能。 最後,對於反傾銷制度的健全運作,作者提出了一些建議。
     Because nations can apply antidumping duty not only to offest international unfair trade practice, but also to circumvent the regulations of GATT and WTO in order to protect domestic industry. Antidumping scheme has gradually gained its popularity since 1980. Literature review and an economic model are used to explore important political and economic determinants on the ruling of antidumping duty. Besides economic factors, interest groups and trade retaliation are two primary political elements that affect decision-making of levying antidumping duty. The author proposes some suggestions that should be helpful to improve the soundness of antidumping scheme.
期刊論文
1.林宜男(19970500)。補貼與平衡稅法規主要理論、實施策略之探討(以歐體為例)。貿易調查專刊,2,105-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.劉大年(19960500)。WTO進口防衛制度與我國進口防衛制度之研究。貿易調查專刊,1,99-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Murray, T.、Rousslang, D. J.(1989)。A Method for Estimating Injury Caused by Unfair Trade Practices。International Review of Law and Economics,9(2),149-164。  new window
4.吳家聲(19960300)。反傾銷制度之發展沿革。財稅研究,28(2),22-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.吳再益、賴英崑(19970500)。美國實施反傾銷暨平衡稅措施經濟效益分析之探討。貿易調查專刊,2,83-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.余朝權、邱永和(19960500)。產業損害認定與進口救濟措施採行之模型與圖示分析。貿易調查專刊,1,45-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.江念慈(19960500)。反傾銷制度之損害認定中實質損害要件之探討。貿易調查專刊,1,157-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.黃智輝(19960900)。我國平衡稅及反傾銷稅進口救濟制度。今日經濟,349,25-31。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃智輝(19950300)。我國反傾銷案件之產業損害調查救濟制度。今日經濟,331,14-20。  延伸查詢new window
10.林永樂(19970600)。反傾銷行政檢討制度之認識與因應。進口救濟論叢,10,1-33。  延伸查詢new window
11.蔡宏明(19950600)。烏拉圭回合反傾銷協定對我國反傾銷制度的影響。進口救濟論叢,6,129-165。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃馥萍(19960500)。課徵反傾銷稅之救濟。貿易調查專刊,1,175-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Devault, J. M.(1993)。Economics and the International Trade Commission。Southern Economic Journal,1993(Oct.),463-478。  new window
14.Anderson, K. B.(1993)。Agency Discretion or Statutory Direction: Decision Making at the U.S. International Trade Commission。The Journal of Law and Economics,36(2),915-936。  new window
15.Andere, Eduardo(19931200)。墨西哥反傾銷制度--理論架構、政策及實務。進口救濟論叢,3,381-414。  延伸查詢new window
16.鄺承華(19930100)。我國反傾銷政策之探討。進口救濟論叢,1,1-41。  延伸查詢new window
17.蔡宏明(19970600)。反傾銷措施的市場競爭效果。進口救濟論叢,10,35-49。  延伸查詢new window
18.Finger, J. M.、Hall, H. K.、Nelson, D. R.(1982)。The Political Economy of Administered Protection。American Economic Review,72,452-466。  new window
19.Takacs, W. E.(1981)。Pressures for Protectionism: An Empirical Analysis。Economic Inquiry,19(4),687-693。  new window
20.Herander, M. G.、Schwartz, J. B.(1984)。An Empirical Test of the Impact of the Threat of US Trade Policy: The Case of Antidumping Duties。Southern Economics Journal,51,59-79。  new window
21.黃智輝(19970500)。貿易自由化、產業結構調整與進口救濟制度。貿易調查專刊,2,13-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Hansen, W. L.(1990)。The International Trade Commission and the Politics of Protectionism。American Political Science Review,84,21-46。  new window
23.Moore, M.(1992)。Rules or Politics?: An Empirical Analysis of ITC Antidumping Decisions。Economic Inquiry,1992(Jul.),449-466。  new window
會議論文
1.李隆生(1998)。我國反傾銷制度中影響傾銷和產業損害因果關係成立因素的探討。貿易救濟制度與爭端解決案例研討會。中興大學農業經濟系。1-28。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳再益(1997)。美國實施反傾銷稅暨平衡稅措施經濟效益分析之研究。經濟部貿易調查委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.經濟部貿易調查委員會(1998)。反傾銷制度及實務。  延伸查詢new window
3.U.S. International Trade Commission(1995)。The Economic Effects of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders and Suspension Agreements。International Trade Committee。  new window
圖書論文
1.WTO(1995)。Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994。The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE