:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:新的規劃政治經濟學:市民社會之崛起
書刊名:城市與設計學報
作者:Friedmann,John黃肇新 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Chao-hsing
出版日期:1998
卷期:4
頁次:頁1-20
主題關鍵詞:規劃理論政治經濟學規劃教育市民社會公民權家戶社區組織參與Planning theoryPolitical economyPlanning educationCivil societyHouseholdCommunity organizationParticipation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(2) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:69
     本文從全球的政治社會及經濟發展經驗,討論市民社會在當代的意義、規劃師的可能角色及規劃專業教育的新方向。 作者將市民社會定義為:社會形構中的四個行動及有意義的社會實踐範疇之一(另外三個範疇分別是國家,資本及政治)。本文認為組織市民社會及其他形式的社會組織與集體行動的核心是家戶,家戶不只是消費單位,也是生產和再生產單位。家戶要得到發展,市民權的發展是重要關鍵。文中作者強調,傳統馬克思主義的語彙裡,忽略了市民社會的發展目的是“為其自身”這一層意義。 市民社會將成為新政治經濟的主題,也將做為建構我們的城市與區域的集體行動者。規劃者的挑戰是重新界定自己及其專業,使之與浮現中的市民社會相一致,以尋找美好的生活。
     This paper describes, base on contemporary global political social economic development, the meaning of civil society, roles of planners and new directions for planning education. Friedmann defines civil society, as one of four partially autonomous and overlapping spheres of action and valued social practices. Central to the organization of civil society and the basis of all other forms of social organization and collective action is the household. The key to the development of households is the development of civil rihgts. Firedmann argued that traditional Marxist terminology doesn't capture the moment of civil society being for itself. The author emphasis that the hallmark of the new political economy is the reemergence of civil society as a collective actor in the construction of our cities and regions. The challenge for planners is, in search of good life, to redefine themselves and their profession in ways that will make their work congruent with it.
期刊論文
1.Pettie, Lisa(1968)。Reflections on Advocacy Planning。Journal of American Institute of Planning,31(4),331。  new window
圖書
1.Walzer, M.(1983)。Spheres of Justice。Spheres of Justice。New York。  new window
2.Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich、Knox, T. M.(1967)。Philosophy of Right。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Castells, Manuel(1983)。The City and grass Roots。The City and grass Roots。Berkeley and Los Angels。  new window
4.Keane, John(1988)。Civil Society and the State: New European Perspectives。Verso。  new window
5.Sassen, Saskia(1991)。The Global City, NY, London, Tokyo。Princeton University Press。  new window
6.Tocqueville, Alexis de、Lawrence, George(1969)。Democracy in America。NY:Ancor Books。  new window
7.Cohen, Jean L.、Arato, Andrew(1992)。Civil Society and Political Theory。MIT Press。  new window
8.Friedmann, John(1992)。Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development。Blackwell。  new window
9.Bager, Peter L.(1977)。To Empower People: The Role of Mediating Sturctures in Public Policy。To Empower People: The Role of Mediating Sturctures in Public Policy。Washington, DC。  new window
10.Bluestone, Barry、Harrison, Bennett(1980)。Capital and Communities: The Causes and Consequences of Private Disinvestment。Washington, DC:The Progressive Alliance。  new window
11.Carroll, Thomas F.(1992)。Intermediary NGO'S: The Supporting Links in Grassroots Development。Intermediary NGO'S: The Supporting Links in Grassroots Development。West Hartford。  new window
12.Friedmann, John(1988)。Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action。Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action。Princeton, NJ。  new window
13.Korten, David C.(1990)。Getting to the 21st Century: Voluntary Action and the Golbal Agenda。Getting to the 21st Century: Voluntary Action and the Golbal Agenda。West Hartford, CT。  new window
14.Piven, Frances Fox、Cloward, Richard A.(1977)。Poor People's Movement: Why The Succeed. How They Fail。Poor People's Movement: Why The Succeed. How They Fail。New York。  new window
15.Storper, Michael、Walker, Richard(1989)。The Capitalist Imoerative。The Capitalist Imoerative。Oxford。  new window
圖書論文
1.Keane, John(1988)。Despotism and Democracy: The Origins and Development of the Distiction between Civil Society and the State 1750-1850。Civil Society and the State。Verso。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top