臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：The Psychological Perspective of Visual Penetration in Measuring Scenic Beauty Quality
書刊名：戶外遊憩研究
作者：李英弘／Hammitt,William
作者(外文)：Li, Ying-hung
出版日期：1999
卷期：12:1
頁次：頁1-17
主題關鍵詞：環境偏好矩陣；結構方程式模式；視覺可及性；訊息涵容性；Environmental preference matrix；Structural equation modeling；SEM；Visual accessibility；Information capability
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:30
　　　　　在景觀評估心理學模式的應用中，Kaplan & Kaplan的環境偏好矩陣一直是被研 究者所採用以了解景觀偏好之心理層面反應。有鑑於視覺穿透性在生心理模式測量上一直 是一很重要的因子，本研究嘗試從心理層面來探討視覺穿透性，以及和Kaplan & Kaplan 的環境偏好矩陣之間的關係。三組不同背景的受測者觀看一系列森林景觀幼燈片以評估景 觀美質、一致性、易讀性、複雜性、神秘性、及視覺穿透性。在逐步（stepwise）多元回 歸分析得知，一致性和神秘性對景觀美質有顯著的影響。另一方面，經由結構方程式模式 分析，導出與Kaplan & Kaplan模式相異的結果。以易讀性、複雜性、及視覺穿透性構成 視覺可及性（visual accessibility）層面。而一致性及神秘性則構成訊息涵容性（ information capability）層面。
　　　　　In the field of scenic beauty measurement, Kaplan & Kaplan's environmental preference matrix has been wildly used in psychological model. Based on practical research results, visual penetration is confirmed as a valid factor to influence scenic beauty from psychophysical perspective. Also, literature review shows that visual penetration could be explained from psychological point of view. Given this line of argument, the purpose of this study is to measure visual penetration from psychological perspective, and to analyze the relationship with Kaplan & Kaplan's model. The multiple regression results show that coherence and mystery have significant influence on scenic beauty evaluation. Using Structural Equation Modeling ( SEM), two dimensions are generated which differ from Kaplan & Kaplan's model. Legibility, complexity, and visual penetration are gathered together as visual accessibility dimension, while coherence and mystery are grouped as information capability dimension.
期刊論文
1.Hull, R. B.、Buhyoff, G. J.(1986)。The Scenic Beauty Temporal Distribution Method: An Attempt to Make Scenic Beauty Assessments Compatible with Forest Planning Efforts。Forest Science，32(2)，271-286。  new window
2.Brush, R. O.(1976)。Space within the woods: Managing forests for visual enjoyment。Journal of Forestry，74，744-747。  new window
3.Brown, T. C.、Daniel, T. C.、King, D. A.(1988)。Recreation participation and the validity of photo-based preference judgements。Journal of Leisure Research，21，40-60。  new window
4.Gimblett, H. R.、Itami, R, M.、Fitzgibbon, J. E.(1985)。Mystery in an information processing model of landscape preference。Landscape Journal，4(2)，87-95。  new window
5.Ruddell, E. J.、Gramann, J. H.、Rudis, V. A.、Westphal, J. M.(1989)。The psychological utility of visual penetration in near-view forest scenic-beauty models。Environment and Behavior，21，393-412。  new window
6.Schroeder, H. W.(1984)。Environmental perception rating scales: A case for simple methods of analysis。Environment and Behavior，1984(5)，573-598。  new window
7.Schroeder, H. W.、Daniel, T. C.(1980)。Predicting the scenic quality of forest road corridors。Environment and Behavior，1980(12)，349-366。  new window
8.Rudis, V. A.、Gramann, J. H.、Ruddell, E. J.、Westphal, J. M.(1988)。Forest inventory and management-based visual preference models of southern pine stands。Forest Science，34，846-863。  new window
9.Anderson, James C.、Gerbing, David W.(1988)。Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach。Psychological Bulletin，103(3)，411-423。  new window
會議論文
1.Rudis, V. A.、Gramann, J. H.、Herrick, T. A.(1994)。Esthetics evaluation。symposium on ecosystem management research in the Ouachita Mountains: Pretreatment conditions and preliminary findings。New Orleans, LA：USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station。  new window
2.Hoffman, R. E.、Palmer, J. F.(1995)。Validity of using photographs to simulate visible qualities of forest recreation environments。1994 northeastern recreation research symposium。Randor, PA：Northeastern Forest Experiment Station。83-89。  new window
學位論文
1.Hetherington, J. D.(1992)。Toward an Integrative Theory of Environmental Aesthetics(博士論文)。The University of Arizona。  new window
2.Mohd-Shariff, M. K. B.(1994)。A cross-cultural comparison of visual landscape preferences for the natural environment(博士論文)。Colorado State University。  new window
圖書
1.Herzog, T.(1996)。Research methods and data analysis in the social sciences。New York：Addison Wesley Longman Publisher。  new window
2.Kaplan, S.、Kaplan, R.(1982)。Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World。New York, NY：Praeger。  new window
3.Arnheim, Rudolf(1969)。Visual Thinking。Berkeley：Los Angeles：California, CA：University of California Press。  new window
4.Byrne, B. M.(1994)。Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, application, and programming。Thousand Oaks, CA：SAGE publications。  new window
5.Daniel, T. C.、Boster, R. S.(1976)。Measuring landscape aesthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method。Ft. Collins, CO：U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station。  new window
6.Cordell, H.、James, G.(1972)。Visitor's preferences for certain physical characteristics of developed campsites。Asheville, NC：USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station。  new window
7.Kaplan, Rachel、Kaplan, Stephen(1989)。The experience of nature: A psychological perspective。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Daniel, T. C.、Vining, J.(1983)。Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality。Behavior and the Natural Environment。New York：Plenum Press。  new window
2.Hoyle, R. H.、Panter, A. T.(1995)。Writing about structural equation models。Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications。Thousand Oaks, California：Sage Publications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1016（臺灣：978，外國：38） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2541260 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68346949
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上