:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:福隆漁村居民對海域遊憩開發的態度之研究
書刊名:戶外遊憩研究
作者:李來圓劉清榕
作者(外文):Lee, Lai-yuanLiu, Ching-yung
出版日期:1999
卷期:12:2
頁次:頁39-54
主題關鍵詞:遊憩開發的態度海域遊憩福隆Recreation development attitudeOceanic recreationFu-long
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:23
     本研究主要目的有三點:1.探討不同特質漁村居民對海域遊憩開發態度的影響。 2. 分析不同特質漁村居民對海域遊憩開發態度影響的機制。3. 分析不同特質漁村居民在資 源開發、休閒遊憩、環境意識、海域所有權等觀念以及漁港轉型、轉業意願方面的差異。 本研究以臺北縣貢寮鄉福隆漁村之村民為對象,結果顯示福隆漁村人口普遍老化;多為世代 居民;教育程度偏低;漁業為居民的主要職業,漁業是家庭的主要收入者佔三分之一。漁村 居民大多數不想轉業。轉業想擔任工作以觀光行業最多,轉業項目以擔任船舶駕駛最多。 漁村居民絕大多數贊成海域遊憩開發,漁民和非漁民並無顯著的不同。教育程度較高的居民 較不贊成海域遊憩開發。居民部份基本特質直接影響海域遊憩開發的態度,部份受到海洋保 育意識等抑制變項影響。女性居民轉入觀光業意願很高。
     There are three research purposes in this study: 1. to explore the impact of attributes of residents in a fishing village on their attitudes toward oceanic recreation development F 2.to identify the mechanism between residents' attributes and attitudes toward oceanic development; and 3.to analyze the difference in resources development, leisure recreation, environmental awareness, ocean ownership, and harbor transfer among residents with different attributes. The study samples are selected from the residents of Fu-Long fishing village located in Taipei County. The results show that the most residents in this sampled village are more aged and live for generations. They are also lower educated and fishing is their main living style. One-third of residents live on fishing. Most residents don't want to change their jobs. Tourist business and boat driver are the most interested for those who are willing to change their jobs. Most villagers agree with the oceanic recreation development, and there is no difference between fisherman and non-fisherman. Also, the higher villager educated the less agree with the oceanic recreation development. The female villagers are more likely to express to transfer to tourism.
期刊論文
1.Burns, D.(1996)。Attitude towards Tourism Development。Annals of Tourism Research,23,935-938。  new window
2.Lankford, Samuel V.、Howard, Dennis R.(1994)。Developing a Tourism Impact Attitude Scale。Annals of Tourism Research,21(1),121-139。  new window
學位論文
1.郭柏村(1994)。觀音山風景區居民對觀光開發影響認知之研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃翠梅(1996)。九份現地居民對觀光衝擊的知覺與態度(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Shivers, J. S.(1981)。Leisure and Recreation Concepts: A Critical Analysis。Boston:Allyn & Bacon, Inc。  new window
2.Triandis, H. C.(1971)。Attitude and Attitude Change。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.Eiser, J. Richard、Van der Pligt, J.(1988)。Attitude and Decisions。London:The Guernsey Press。  new window
4.Brockman, C. F.、Lawrence, C. M. Jr.、William, R. C. Jr.、Barney, D.(1979)。Recreational Use of Wild Lands。New York:McGraw-Hill Book Company。  new window
5.經建會住都處(1996)。台灣地區戶外遊憩政策之研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.貢寮鄉公所(1997)。親山近水--貢寮鄉。  延伸查詢new window
7.交通部觀光局(1997)。台灣地區近岸海域遊憩活動之現況調査及制度研究。中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.交通部觀光局(1995)。國人國內旅遊狀況調查。政治大學公企中心。  延伸查詢new window
9.交通部觀光局(1991)。臺灣地區觀光遊憩系統開發計畫第二期第一階段研究報吿。僑龍工程顧問公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.內政部營建署(1996)。臺灣地區整體海岸管理計畫。  延伸查詢new window
11.Bammel, Gene、Burrus-Bammel, Lei Lane、涂淑芳(1996)。休閒與人類行為。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.吳聰賢(1978)。態度量表的建立。社會及行為科學研究法。台北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE