:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:示範者結果獲知的相對頻率對觀察者動作學習的影響
書刊名:大專體育學刊
作者:陳新燕卓俊伶 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Shin-yanJwo, Jun-ling
出版日期:1999
卷期:1:1
頁次:頁131-138
主題關鍵詞:觀察學習結果獲知的相對頻率引導假說學習中的示範者Observational learningRelative frequency of KRGuidance hypothesisLearning model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:36
     本研究旨在探討觀察學習中,不同「學習中示範者」結果獲知的相對頻率,對觀 察者學習手臂外移簡單動作的影響。 以大學女生四十名為觀察者隨機分派到四組之一: ぇ 100%KR 組、え 50%KR 組、ぉ 20%KR 組お NOKR 組。 經混合設計二因子變異數分析和杜凱 氏法( HSD )事後比較。結果發現:動作準確性( AE )方面,在十分鐘保留,NOKR 組和 20%KR 組動作的準確性顯著高於 100%KR 組;在 100%KR 組,十分鐘保留的動作準確性顯著 低於一分鐘保留;在 NOKR 組,十分鐘保留的動作準確性顯著高於一分鐘保留。動作變異性 ( VE )和動作偏向( CE )方面,各組示範者結果獲知相對頻率與保留期之間,沒有交互 作用的關係存在;各組之間和保留期之間也沒有顯著的差異。動作偏量(| CE |)方面, 在十分鐘保留, 20%KR 組動作的偏量顯著低於 100%KR 組; NOKR 組動作的偏量顯著低於 50%KR 組和 100%KR 組; 在 100%KR 組,十分鐘保留的動作偏量顯著高於一分鐘保留; 在 NOKR 組,十分鐘保留的動作偏量顯著低於一分鐘保留。 本研究結果經過討論後得到的結論 是:觀察「學習中的示範者」,或是觀察「學習中的示範者」並接收示範者較低的結果獲知 相對頻率,會影響動作準確性和動作偏量的學習。
     The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of learning model's KR relative frequency during observational learning of simple motor task for observer. Forty female university students served as participants and were randomly assigned to one of the following observation group:(a) 100% KR group; (b) 50% KR group; (c) 20% KR group; and (d) NOKR group. Simple arm-outward movements was experimental tasks. Two-way ANOVA last factor repeated and Tukey HSD method were used for statistical analysis. In AE scores, interaction between groups and retentions was found. In ten-minute retention, NOKR group and 20% KR group were better accurate than that in 100%KR group. In 100%KR group, ten-minute retention was less accurate than that in one-minute retention. In NOKR group, ten-minute retention was better accurate than that in one-minute retention. In VE and CE scores, there were not interaction between groups and retentions. Furthermore there were not significant different of both groups and retentions. In | CE | scores, interaction between groups and retentions was found. In ten-minute retention, NOKR group and 20%KR group were less bias than that in 100% KR group, NOKR group was less bias than that in 50%KR group. In 100%KR group, ten-minute retention was higher bias than that in one-minute retention. In NOKR group, ten-minute retention was lower bias than that in one-minute retention. It is concluded that, during observational learning, no KR or lower relative frequency of KR from learning model is a learning variable of simple motor task.
期刊論文
1.Adams, J. A.(1986)。Use of the model's knowledge of results to increase the observer's performance。Journal of Human Movement Studies,12(2),89-98。  new window
2.Hebert, E. P.、Landin, D.(1994)。Effects of a learning model and augmented feedback on tennis skill acquisition。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,65,250-257。  new window
3.McCuilagh, P.、Caird, J. K.(1990)。Correct and learning models and the use of model knowledge of results in the acquisition and retention of a motor skill。Journal of Human Movement Studies,18,107-116。  new window
4.Weir, P. L.、Leavitt, J. L.(1990)。Effect of model's skill level and model's knowledge of results on the performance of a dart throwing task。Human Movement Science,9,369-383。  new window
5.Winstein, C. J.、Schmidt, R. A.(1990)。Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning。Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: learning, memory, and cognition,4,677-691。  new window
6.陳新燕、卓俊伶(19970100)。動作示範中的結果獲知對動作表現和學習的影響。體育學報,22,329-338。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Adams, Jack A.(1971)。A closed-loop theory of motor learning。Journal of Motor Behavior,3(2),111-150。  new window
8.Salmoni, Alan W.、Schmidt, Richard A.、Walter, Charles B.(1984)。Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical Reappraisal。Psychological Bulletin,95(3),355-386。  new window
圖書
1.Fitts, P. M.、Posner, M. I.(1967)。Human performance。Brooks/Cole。  new window
2.Schmidt, R. A.(1988)。Motor control and teaming: A behavioral emphasis。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
3.Schmidt, R. A.(1991)。Motor learning and performance: From principles to practice。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
4.林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory。Prentice-Hall。  new window
圖書論文
1.Newell, K. M.(1981)。Skill learning。Human Skills。New York:Wiley。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top