Kantian aesthetic discourse seems built exclusively on this exclusion of the personal and the economical to ensure the collective-ness and universality of the judgment made by the aesthetic subject, even though the discourse clearly celebrates the genius, the free expressive self. My thesis focuses on the excluded "interest" in the Kantian aesthetic judgment. For me, there is something behind the insistence of disinterestedness" of the aesthetic judgment. External forces symbolized by the term-interest-seem to be an annoying part of the aesthetic. They have to be exorcised. The purgation of "interest" has to be incessant so much so that what interest symbolizes, i.e. the economical, seems to be the essential part of aesthetic discourse. The thesis of this report is the Kantian aesthetics is an ideological mask that tries to disguises the uneasiness, the anxiety in the conflicts between cultural forces and economic forces. Both forces are two sides of one coin-capitism.