Talk for men is a way of existence. Through talk we can trace signs of our existence. However men's existence is not merely limited in the realm of talk. Talk serves to make communication amongst people, and appeals to written words and symbols. Whereas the extent of men's existence goes beyond that. In the wider realm of existence, i.e. man and God, man and the universe, man and the self, talk is without words. The records of words and symbols are only a small part of human existence. The open relation between language and existence is like that between method and substance. But existence has the priority, it is the main body of talk. I think that the way of talk should not be limited in conveying concepts, rhetoric. Talk without words should be included, as the talk of experience in the Chinese philosophy, and the communication with God in the West etc. Although concrete concept-conveying and rhetoric are important, yet there are defects in them. The way of talk is unlimited, for the “Tao” is indefinitely open.