Graduate Student, Law school of National Taiwan University Procurement of public construction is the preeminent concern of Taiwan economic regulation. In May 27, 1999, "Government Procurement Act"(GPA)is going to be effective. Before that, " Fair Trade Law" (FTL)has been one of the most significant regulation of government procurement, especially in the disputes of public construction. Therefore, how to harmonize the relationship between GPA and FTL is the main purpose of this article. This article is based on the thinking of why we should treat public purchasing differently from private doing and how we could do for that. One method is internal control, as administrative monitor system; the other one is external control, as market monitor system. For redress to disgruntled offerors, we set up multiplicity of devices to permitting review within the purchasing agency itself. Besides, the 'bid protest' system also provides offerors with contest procurement decision of government agency. All of these, along with promote the efficiency of purchasing and protect the advantages of offerors, maintaining the competition order of market is one of the aims of the legal systems. The opinion of this article, therefore, considers it necessary for the cooperation of FTC and PCC (Public Construction Commission ) to reciprocate deficiency, since GPA can't totally replace of the function of FTL in the field of procurement. This article is simply divided into three parts. Part I is to epitomize and analysis the practices of Fair Trade Commission about procurement. Part II is to analysis the interaction of FTA and GPA. Part III is the conclusion of this article and provides some suggestion.