Due to the fast development of science and technology information in the 1ast few years, there have been significant changes in biochemical databases systems. Improvements can be found in the following areas: usage of Internet, electronic full-text journals, information systems which link to document delivery and interlibrary loan systems, emphasis on consumer health information, the change of scope and coverage of database, and the variance of search engine platforms. These changes influence library management. They also affect the accessibility of information. This paper discusses developments in the areas described above and compares some representative biomedical databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, CSA Life Sciences Collection and ISI Current Contents. The criteria of comparison are scope and coverage of document type, thesaurus, currency, size of collection, search fields, frequency of updates and the performance evaluation of search functions. We hope this help this can help more users of health science information to use these databases more accurately and efficient. This study hopes to promote research and development in the areas of clinical education and services in Taiwan.