:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:生物醫學資料庫之發展與比較
書刊名:中國圖書館學會會報
作者:謝美玲
作者(外文):Hsieh, Mei-ling
出版日期:1999
卷期:63
頁次:頁1-18
主題關鍵詞:生物醫學資料庫醫學資料庫資料庫比較資料庫發展MedlineEMBASEBIOSISCAS life sciences collectionCurrent contentsPubMedInternet grateful medPreMedlineLoansome docDocLineMedical database
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:27
     隨科技資訊之發展,醫學資料庫與資訊系統發展有極大之改變,如:全球網路化 應用環境、期刊全文電子化、文獻檢索系統與全文遞送服務之結合、跨資料庫間 之資源整合、消費者健康資訊之重視等。這些改變資源之整合,影響了圖書館之 管理與服務,也改變了使用者之使用習慣,本文除介紹上述生物醫學資料庫與資 訊系統近年來之發展與影響,並選錄具代表性之資料庫,如:Medline、EMBASE、 BIOSIS、CSA Life Sciences Collection與 Current Contents Search等生物醫 學及其與相關的資料庫,介紹之並比較其收錄學科、資料型態範圍、索引典使用、 資料庫量、時效性、製作、使用上之差異,及相關之研究文獻,瞭解各資料庫之 被使用與評估情形。希透過這些介紹,以協助圖書資訊、生物醫學相關人員與使 用者,得以有效的運用資料庫資源,進而促進國內生物醫學研究、臨床、教學與 服務之進步發展。
     Due to the fast development of science and technology information in the 1ast few years, there have been significant changes in biochemical databases systems. Improvements can be found in the following areas: usage of Internet, electronic full-text journals, information systems which link to document delivery and interlibrary loan systems, emphasis on consumer health information, the change of scope and coverage of database, and the variance of search engine platforms. These changes influence library management. They also affect the accessibility of information. This paper discusses developments in the areas described above and compares some representative biomedical databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews, CSA Life Sciences Collection and ISI Current Contents. The criteria of comparison are scope and coverage of document type, thesaurus, currency, size of collection, search fields, frequency of updates and the performance evaluation of search functions. We hope this help this can help more users of health science information to use these databases more accurately and efficient. This study hopes to promote research and development in the areas of clinical education and services in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.張慧銖、黃婷鈺(19961200)。統一醫學語言系統簡介。圖書館學刊. 臺大,11,165-204。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.文明(1998)。跨入二十一世紀生物技術的新紀元。科技發展政策報導,SR8705。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉德明、謝美玲、楊麗娟(1998)。醫藥衛生研究資訊網(HINT)之系統與資源整合發展。中華民國圖書館學會會報,61,15-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Ovid Technologies, Inc.(1997)。Ovid Technologies Field Guide: Biosis previews, Biological Abstracts on CD, Biological Abstracts/RRM on CD。OVID Web Gateway User Manual。  new window
5.U. S. Ovid Technologies, Inc.(1997)。Ovid Technologies Field Guide: CSA-Life Sciences Collection。OVID Web Gateway User Manual。  new window
6.Ovid Technologies, Inc.(1997)。Ovid Technologies Field Guide: Current Contents Search。OVID Web Gateway User Manual。  new window
7.Brown, C. M.(1998)。The Benefits of Searching Embase Versus Medline for Pharmaceutical Information。Online and CD-ROM Review,22(1),3-8。  new window
8.Barrillot, M. J.、Sarrut, B.、Doreau, C. G.(1997)。Evaluation of Drug Interaction Citation in Nine On-line Bibliographic Databases。Ann Pharmacother,31,45-49。  new window
9.Woods, David、Trewheellar, Kate(1998)。Medline and Embase Complement each other in Literature Searches。BMJ: British Medical Journal,316(718),1166。  new window
10.Greenhalgh, Trisha(1997)。How to Read a Paper: The Medline Database。British Medical Journal,315(7101),180-183。  new window
11.Smith, B.、Darzins, P.、Quinn, M.、Heller, R. F.(1992)。Modern Methods of Searching the Medical Literature。Medical Journal of Austria,157,603-611。  new window
12.Burnjam, J.、Shearer, B.(1993)。Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Databases for the Nurse Researcher。Medical Reference Services Quarterly,12(3),45-57。  new window
13.Begley, C. M.、Braxier, H.(1996)。Selecting a Database for Literature Searches in Nursing: MEDLINE or CINAHL?。Journal of Advanced Nursing,24(4),868-875。  new window
14.Tringali, M.、Pramotton, L.、Iannucci, P.、Cosentino, F.(1996)。The Utilization of Medline for the Solution of Real Clinical Problems: A Prospective Study in Italy。Recenti Progressi in Medicine,87(12),576-581。  new window
其他
1.U. S. National Library of Medicine(1998)。NLM Announces Plan to Increase Public Access to Health Information on the Internet。  new window
2.Ovid Technologies Co.。Ovid Full Text。  new window
3.Elsevier。Elsevier Science Publisher。  new window
4.UMI。ProQuest Medical Library: Over 100 Top Medical and nursing journals in full image。  new window
5.Adonis, B. V.。Adonis-Electronic Journal Services。  new window
6.Adonis, B. V.(1998)。Adonis Document Delivery Service(DDS)。  new window
7.Stanford University Libraries' High Wire Press(1998)。High Wire Press: A Brief Introduction。  new window
8.Donald, A. B.,Lindberg, M. D.(1999)。NLM Director Testifies on FY 2000 Budget. Director, National Library of Medicine on Fiscal Year 2000 President's Budget Requestr for National Library of Medicine。  new window
9.The Journal of the American Medical Associat(1988)。JAMA Patient Page。  new window
10.U. S. National Cancer Institute(1998)。CancerNet。  new window
11.U. S. National Library of Medicine。The National Library of Medicine's MEDLINE plus。  new window
12.U. S. National Library of Medicine。Medline。  new window
13.U. S. National Library of Medicine(1998)。Fact Sheet MEDLINE。  new window
14.U. S. National Library of Medicine(1998)。Medical Subject Headings。  new window
15.U. S. National Library of Medicine(1998)。NLM's Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Project。  new window
16.U. S. National Library of Medicine(1998)。Journal Selection for Index Medicus/Medline。  new window
17.U. S. National Library of Medicine(1999)。List of Journals Indexed in Index Medicus。  new window
18.U. S. National Library of Medicine(1998)。EMBASE-STN Database Summary Sheet。  new window
19.Elsevier,EMBASE(1998)。EMBASE-The Excerpta Medica Database。  new window
20.EMBASE Subsets FIELDDESCRIPTIONS。  new window
21.BIOSIS(1998)。What is BIOSIS。  new window
22.BISOSIS。How to Search BIOSIS Previews for Medical Information。  new window
23.Current Contents Search。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE